Literature DB >> 23719264

Evaluation of midkine as a diagnostic serum biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Wen-Wei Zhu1, Jia-Jian Guo, Lei Guo, Hu-Liang Jia, Ming Zhu, Ju-Bo Zhang, Christopher A Loffredo, Marshonna Forgues, Hua Huang, Xu-Jian Xing, Ning Ren, Qiong-Zhu Dong, Hai-Jun Zhou, Zheng-Gang Ren, Nai-Qing Zhao, Xin Wei Wang, Zhao-You Tang, Lun-Xiu Qin, Qing-Hai Ye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of serum midkine (MDK) as a diagnostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly for those with negative alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and at an early stage. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: MDK expression in tumors was assessed by immunohistochemistry from 105 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas or liver cirrhosis. Serum MDK levels were detected by ELISA in 933 participants including hepatocellular carcinomas and hospital controls from different medical centers. Sensitivities and specificities of serum MDK in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma according to AFP level and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage were analyzed.
RESULTS: MDK levels were significantly elevated in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues as well as serum samples. The sensitivity of serum MDK for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis was much higher than that of AFP (86.9% vs. 51.9%) with similar specificities (83.9% vs. 86.3%). Notably, serum MDK had an outstanding performance in distinguishing AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinomas from different controls: In those AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinomas, the sensitivity could reach as high as 89.2%. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis also showed that serum MDK had a better performance compared with AFP in distinguishing early-stage hepatocellular carcinomas as well as small hepatocellular carcinomas. Even in very early-stage hepatocellular carcinomas, MDK showed an obviously higher sensitivity compared with AFP (80% vs. 40%). Furthermore, serum MDK level was significantly decreased in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas after curative resection and re-elevated when tumor relapse occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum MDK is significantly elevated in most hepatocellular carcinomas, including those with negative AFP and at an early stage, which may serve as a novel diagnostic marker in early diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of hepatocellular carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719264      PMCID: PMC6314491          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  41 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Increased midkine expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M Kato; T Shinozawa; S Kato; A Awaya; T Terada
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma increases the chance of treatment: Hong Kong experience.

Authors:  M F Yuen; C C Cheng; I J Lauder; S K Lam; C G Ooi; C L Lai
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function: implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Serum tumor markers: past, state of the art, and future.

Authors:  C M Thomas; C G Sweep
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  AFP-L3: a new generation of tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  D Li; T Mallory; S Satomura
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Clinical significance of lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of serum alpha-fetoprotein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuhei Yoshida; Kazutaka Kurokohchi; Keiji Arima; Tsutomu Masaki; Naoki Hosomi; Toshiharu Funaki; Masayuki Murota; Yuko Kita; Seishiro Watanabe; Shigeki Kuriyama
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Treatment strategy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of long-term results after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy and surgical resection.

Authors:  J Yamamoto; S Okada; K Shimada; T Okusaka; S Yamasaki; H Ueno; T Kosuge
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Preoperative serum midkine concentration is a prognostic marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Yoshihiro Nabeya; Masatoshi Tagawa; Shin-ichi Okazumi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Kenji Kadomatsu; Takashi Muramatsu; Shinya Ikematsu; Sadatoshi Sakuma; Takenori Ochiai
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 10.  Midkine and pleiotrophin: two related proteins involved in development, survival, inflammation and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Takashi Muramatsu
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.387

View more
  59 in total

1.  Serglycin (SRGN) overexpression predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Lu He; Xinke Zhou; Chen Qu; Yunqiang Tang; Qiong Zhang; Jian Hong
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Should AFP (or any biomarkers) be used for HCC surveillance?

Authors:  Hager F Ahmed Mohammed; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Curr Hepatol Rep       Date:  2017-04-28

3.  The clinical and prognostic significance of midkine in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Fuguang Li; Peijun Tian; Jun Zhang; Changyuan Kou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 4.  Biomarker development for hepatocellular carcinoma early detection: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Shreya Sengupta; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 5.  Controversies regarding and perspectives on clinical utility of biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Song; Ju-Feng Xia; Yoshinori Inagaki; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Wei Tang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Role of biomarkers in the prediction and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Khattab; Magdy Fouad; Elham Ahmed
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-18

7.  Model-free scoring system for risk prediction with application to hepatocellular carcinoma study.

Authors:  Weining Shen; Jing Ning; Ying Yuan; Anna S Lok; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  GOLM1 Modulates EGFR/RTK Cell-Surface Recycling to Drive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis.

Authors:  Qing-Hai Ye; Wen-Wei Zhu; Ju-Bo Zhang; Yi Qin; Ming Lu; Guo-Ling Lin; Lei Guo; Bo Zhang; Zhen-Hai Lin; Stephanie Roessler; Marshonna Forgues; Hu-Liang Jia; Lu Lu; Xiao-Fei Zhang; Bao-Feng Lian; Lu Xie; Qiong-Zhu Dong; Zhao-You Tang; Xin Wei Wang; Lun-Xiu Qin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Measuring midkine: the utility of midkine as a biomarker in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  D R Jones
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Targeted proteomics for biomarker discovery and validation of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C infected patients.

Authors:  Gul M Mustafa; Denner Larry; John R Petersen; Cornelis J Elferink
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.