| Literature DB >> 23716051 |
Monolekha Bhattacharya1, Marta Toth, Clyde A Smith, Sergei B Vakulenko.
Abstract
The aminoglycoside 2"-phosphotransferases APH(2")-IIa and APH(2")-IVa can utilize ATP and GTP as cosubstrates, since both enzymes possess overlapping but discrete structural templates for ATP and GTP binding. APH(2″)-IIIa uses GTP exclusively, because its ATP-binding template is blocked by a bulky tyrosine "gatekeeper" residue. Replacement of the "gatekeeper" residues M85 and F95 in APH(2")-IIa and APH(2")-IVa, respectively, by tyrosine does not significantly change the antibiotic susceptibility profiles produced by the enzymes. In APH(2")-IIa, M85Y substitution results in an ~10-fold decrease in the K(m) value of GTP and an ~320-fold increase in the K(m) value of ATP. In APH(2")-IVa, F95Y substitution results in a modest decrease in the K(m) values of both GTP and ATP. Structural analysis indicates that in the APH(2")-IIa M85Y mutant, tyrosine blocks access of ATP to the correct position in the binding site, while the larger nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-binding pocket of the APH(2")-IVa F95Y mutant allows the tyrosine to move away, thus giving access to the ATP-binding template.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23716051 PMCID: PMC3719757 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00381-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191