Literature DB >> 23712123

Detectability of bovine TB using the tuberculin skin test does not vary significantly according to pathogen genotype within Northern Ireland.

David M Wright1, Adrian R Allen, Thomas R Mallon, Stanley W J McDowell, Stephen C Bishop, Elizabeth J Glass, Mairead L Bermingham, John A Woolliams, Robin A Skuce.   

Abstract

Strains of many infectious diseases differ in parameters that influence epidemic spread, for example virulence, transmissibility, detectability and host specificity. Knowledge of inter-strain variation can be exploited to improve management and decrease disease incidence. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is increasingly prevalent among farmed cattle in the UK, exerting a heavy economic burden on the farming industry and government. We aimed to determine whether strains of Mycobacterium bovis (the causative agent of bTB) identified and classified using genetic markers (spoligotyping and multi-locus VNTR analysis) varied in response to the tuberculin skin test; this being the primary method of bTB detection used in the UK. Inter-strain variation in detectability of M. bovis could have important implications for disease control. The skin test is based on a differential delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to intradermal injections of purified protein derivative (PPD) from M. bovis (PPD-B) and Mycobacterium avium (PPD-A). We searched for an association between skin test response (PPD-B skin rise minus PPD-A skin rise) and M. bovis genotype at the disclosing test in culture-confirmed cases using a field dataset consisting of 21,000 isolates belonging to 63 genotypes of M. bovis from cattle in Northern Ireland. We found no substantial variation among genotypes (estimated responses clustered tightly around the mean) controlling for animal sex, breed and test effects. We also estimated the ratio of skin test detected to undetected cases (i.e. cases only detected at abattoir). The skin test detection ratio varied among abattoirs with some detecting a greater proportion of cases than others but this variation was unrelated to the community composition of genotypes within each abattoir catchment. These two lines of evidence indicate that M. bovis genotypes in Northern Ireland have similar detectability using the skin test. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine tuberculosis; Cattle; Detectability; Mycobacterium bovis; Tuberculin test

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712123     DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Genet Evol        ISSN: 1567-1348            Impact factor:   3.342


  9 in total

1.  The impact of the number of tuberculin skin test reactors and infection confirmation on the risk of future bovine tuberculosis incidents; a Northern Ireland perspective.

Authors:  M J H O'Hagan; J A Stegeman; L P Doyle; L A Stringer; E A Courcier; F D Menzies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.434

2.  Relative abundance of Mycobacterium bovis molecular types in cattle: a simulation study of potential epidemiological drivers.

Authors:  Hannah Trewby; David M Wright; Robin A Skuce; Carl McCormick; Thomas R Mallon; Eleanor L Presho; Rowland R Kao; Daniel T Haydon; Roman Biek
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Variation in the Early Host-Pathogen Interaction of Bovine Macrophages with Divergent Mycobacterium bovis Strains in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kirsty Jensen; Iain J Gallagher; Nicholas Johnston; Michael Welsh; Robin Skuce; John L Williams; Elizabeth J Glass
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Bovine Tuberculosis in Britain and Ireland - A Perfect Storm? the Confluence of Potential Ecological and Epidemiological Impediments to Controlling a Chronic Infectious Disease.

Authors:  A R Allen; R A Skuce; A W Byrne
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-05

5.  Spoligotype-specific risk of finding lesions in tissues from cattle infected by Mycobacterium bovis.

Authors:  Alberto Gomez-Buendia; Beatriz Romero; Javier Bezos; Francisco Lozano; Lucía de Juan; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Performance of immunohistochemistry versus real-time PCR method for detecting mycobacterial infections of cattle ‎ screened by comparative tuberculin test.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ashouri; Hossein Nourani
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 0.950

Review 7.  A review of risk factors for bovine tuberculosis infection in cattle in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Broughan; J Judge; E Ely; R J Delahay; G Wilson; R S Clifton-Hadley; A V Goodchild; H Bishop; J E Parry; S H Downs
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  Field-isolated genotypes of Mycobacterium bovis vary in virulence and influence case pathology but do not affect outbreak size.

Authors:  David M Wright; Adrian R Allen; Thomas R Mallon; Stanley W J McDowell; Stephen C Bishop; Elizabeth J Glass; Mairead L Bermingham; John A Woolliams; Robin A Skuce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of bacterial whole-genome sequencing to investigate local persistence and spread in bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Hannah Trewby; David Wright; Eleanor L Breadon; Samantha J Lycett; Tom R Mallon; Carl McCormick; Paul Johnson; Richard J Orton; Adrian R Allen; Julie Galbraith; Pawel Herzyk; Robin A Skuce; Roman Biek; Rowland R Kao
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.396

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.