Alberto Gomez-Buendia1, Beatriz Romero1, Javier Bezos1,2, Francisco Lozano1, Lucía de Juan1,2, Julio Alvarez3,4. 1. VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 2. Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 3. VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. jalvarez@visavet.ucm.es. 4. Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. jalvarez@visavet.ucm.es.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the pathogenic effect of members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in susceptible hosts is well known, differences in clinical signs and pathological findings observed in infected animals have been reported, likely due to a combination of host and pathogen-related factors. Here, we investigated whether Mycobacterium bovis strains belonging to different spoligotypes were associated with a higher risk of occurrence of visible/more severe lesions in target organs (lungs and/or lymph nodes) from infected animals. A large collection of 8889 samples belonging to cattle were classified depending on the presence/absence of tuberculosis-like lesions and its degree of severity. All samples were subjected to culture irrespective of the presence of lesions, and isolates retrieved were identified and subjected to spoligotyping. The association between the presence/severity of the lesions and the isolation of strains from a given spoligotype was assessed using non-parametric tests and Bayesian mixed multivariable logistic regression models that accounted for origin (region and herd) effects. RESULTS: Results suggested a difference in severity in lesioned samples depending on the strain's spoligotype. An association between specific spoligotypes and presence of lesions was observed, with a higher risk of finding lesions in animals infected with strains with spoligotypes SB0120, SB0295 and SB1142 compared with SB0121, and in those coming from certain regions in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that strains belonging to certain spoligotypes may be associated with a higher probability in the occurrence of gross/macroscopic lesions in infected cattle, although these observational findings should be confirmed in further studies that allow accounting for the effect of other possible confounders not considered here, and ultimately through experimental studies.
BACKGROUND: Although the pathogenic effect of members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in susceptible hosts is well known, differences in clinical signs and pathological findings observed in infected animals have been reported, likely due to a combination of host and pathogen-related factors. Here, we investigated whether Mycobacterium bovis strains belonging to different spoligotypes were associated with a higher risk of occurrence of visible/more severe lesions in target organs (lungs and/or lymph nodes) from infected animals. A large collection of 8889 samples belonging to cattle were classified depending on the presence/absence of tuberculosis-like lesions and its degree of severity. All samples were subjected to culture irrespective of the presence of lesions, and isolates retrieved were identified and subjected to spoligotyping. The association between the presence/severity of the lesions and the isolation of strains from a given spoligotype was assessed using non-parametric tests and Bayesian mixed multivariable logistic regression models that accounted for origin (region and herd) effects. RESULTS: Results suggested a difference in severity in lesioned samples depending on the strain's spoligotype. An association between specific spoligotypes and presence of lesions was observed, with a higher risk of finding lesions in animals infected with strains with spoligotypes SB0120, SB0295 and SB1142 compared with SB0121, and in those coming from certain regions in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that strains belonging to certain spoligotypes may be associated with a higher probability in the occurrence of gross/macroscopic lesions in infectedcattle, although these observational findings should be confirmed in further studies that allow accounting for the effect of other possible confounders not considered here, and ultimately through experimental studies.
Authors: A Aranaz; E Liébana; A Mateos; L Dominguez; D Vidal; M Domingo; O Gonzolez; E F Rodriguez-Ferri; A E Bunschoten; J D Van Embden; D Cousins Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: J Kamerbeek; L Schouls; A Kolk; M van Agterveld; D van Soolingen; S Kuijper; A Bunschoten; H Molhuizen; R Shaw; M Goyal; J van Embden Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: H Martin Vordermeier; Mark A Chambers; Paul J Cockle; Adam O Whelan; Jennifer Simmons; R Glyn Hewinson Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Javier Bezos; Julio Alvarez; Lucía de Juan; Beatriz Romero; Sabrina Rodríguez; Isabel G Fernández-de-Mera; R Glyn Hewinson; Martin Vordermeier; Ana Mateos; Lucas Domínguez; Alicia Aranaz Journal: Prev Vet Med Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: D Aguilar León; M J Zumárraga; R Jiménez Oropeza; A K Gioffré; A Bernardelli; H Orozco Estévez; A A Cataldi; R Hernández Pando Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Alicia Aranaz; Lucía De Juan; Natalia Montero; Celia Sánchez; Margarita Galka; Consuelo Delso; Julio Alvarez; Beatriz Romero; Javier Bezos; Ana I Vela; Victor Briones; Ana Mateos; Lucas Domínguez Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Joaquín Vicente; Ursula Höfle; Joseba M Garrido; Isabel G Fernández-de-Mera; Pelayo Acevedo; Ramón Juste; Marta Barral; Christian Gortazar Journal: Vet Res Date: 2007-04-11 Impact factor: 3.683