Literature DB >> 23711732

From gut to kidney: transporting and metabolizing calcineurin-inhibitors in solid organ transplantation.

Noël Knops1, Elena Levtchenko, Bert van den Heuvel, Dirk Kuypers.   

Abstract

Since their introduction circa 35 years ago, calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) have become the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, CNI's possess a narrow therapeutic index with potential severe consequences of drug under- or overexposure. This demands a meticulous policy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) to optimize outcome. In clinical practice optimal dosing is difficult to achieve due to important inter- and intraindividual variation in CNI pharmacokinetics. A complex and often interdependent set of factors appears relevant in determining drug exposure. These include recipient characteristics such as age, race, body composition, organ function, and food intake, but also graft-related characteristics such as: size, donor-age, and time after transplantation can be important. Fundamental (in vitro) and clinical studies have pointed out the intrinsic relation between the aforementioned variables and the functional capacity of enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism, primarily located in intestine, liver and kidney. Commonly occurring polymorphisms in genes responsible for CNI metabolism (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, PXR, POR, ABCB1 (P-gp) and possibly UGT) are able to explain an important part of interindividual variability. In particular, a highly prevalent SNP in CYP3A5 has proven to be an important determinant of CNI dose requirements and drug-dose-interactions. In addition, a discrepancy in genotype between graft and receptor has to be taken into account. Furthermore, common phenomena in solid organ transplantation such as inflammation, ischemia- reperfusion injury, graft function, co-medication, altered food intake and intestinal motility can have a differential effect on the expression enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism. Notwithstanding the built-up knowledge, predicting individual CNI pharmacokinetics and dose requirements on the basis of current clinical and experimental data remains a challenge.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23711732     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  26 in total

Review 1.  Drug-drug interactions with oral anti-HCV agents and idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in the liver transplant setting.

Authors:  Sarah Tischer; Robert J Fontana
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetic considerations for optimizing tacrolimus dosing in liver and kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Alessio Provenzani; Andrew Santeusanio; Erin Mathis; Monica Notarbartolo; Manuela Labbozzetta; Paola Poma; Ambra Provenzani; Carlo Polidori; Giovanni Vizzini; Piera Polidori; Natale D'Alessandro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The impact of tacrolimus exposure on extrarenal adverse effects in adult renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Olivia Campagne; Donald E Mager; Daniel Brazeau; Rocco C Venuto; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Immunosuppressive potency of mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors in solid-organ transplantation.

Authors:  Alberto Baroja-Mazo; Beatriz Revilla-Nuin; Pablo Ramírez; José A Pons
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

5.  Tacrolimus trough-level variability predicts long-term allograft survival following kidney transplantation.

Authors:  John A O'Regan; Mark Canney; Dervla M Connaughton; Patrick O'Kelly; Yvonne Williams; Geraldine Collier; Declan G deFreitas; Conall M O'Seaghdha; Peter J Conlon
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Relationship of CYP3A5 genotype and ABCB1 diplotype to tacrolimus disposition in Brazilian kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Diego Alberto C Cusinato; Riccardo Lacchini; Elen A Romao; Miguel Moysés-Neto; Eduardo B Coelho
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetics and Multiple CYP3A5 Genotypes in Black and White Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Olivia Campagne; Donald E Mager; Daniel Brazeau; Rocco C Venuto; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 8.  Unlocking the Potential of Purinergic Signaling in Transplantation.

Authors:  R Zeiser; S C Robson; T Vaikunthanathan; M Dworak; G Burnstock
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Transplant Recipients: What Did We Learn About Sources of Interindividual Variabilities?

Authors:  Olivia Campagne; Donald E Mager; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 10.  Clinical aspects of tacrolimus use in paediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Prytuła; Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.