AIMS: Tacrolimus (TAC) is one of the most successful immunosuppressive drugs in transplantation. Its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenetics (PG) have been extensively studied, with many studies showing the influence of CYP3A5 on TAC metabolism and bioavailability. However, data concerning the functional significance of ABCB1 polymorphisms are uncertain due to inconsistent results. We evaluated the association between ABCB1 diplotypes, CYP3A5 polymorphisms and TAC disposition in a cohort of Brazilian transplant recipients. METHODS: Individuals were genotyped for the CYP3A5*3 allele and ABCB1 polymorphisms (2677G>A/T, 1236C>T, 3435C/T) using a TaqMan® PCR technique. Diplotypes were analyzed for correlation with the TAC dose-normalized ratio (Co : dose). RESULTS: We genotyped 108 Brazilian kidney recipients for CYP3A5 (11% CYP3A5*1/*1; 31% CYP3A5*1/*3 and 58% CYP3A5*3/*3) and ABCB1 haplotypes (42% CGC/CGC; 41% GCG/TTT and 17% TTT/TTT). Homozygous subjects for the CYP3A5*3 allele or carriers of the ABCB1 TTT/TTT diplotype showed a higher Co : dose ratio compared with wild type subjects [median (interquartile range) 130.2 (97.5-175.4) vs. 71.3 (45.6-109.0), P < 0.0001 and 151.8 (112.1-205.6) vs. 109.6 (58.1-132.9), P = 0.01, respectively]. When stratified for the CYP3A5*3 group, ABCB1 TTT/TTT individuals showed a higher Co : dose ratio compared with non-TTT/TTT individuals [167.8 (130.4-218.0) vs. 119.4 (100.2-166.3), P = 0.04]. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the effects of CYP3A5 polymorphisms and ABCB1 diplotypes remained significant after correction for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A5 is the major enzyme responsible for the marked interindividual variability in TAC PK, but it cannot be considered alone when predicting dose adjustment because ABCB1 diplotypes also affect TAC disposition, showing independent and additive effects on the TAC dose-normalized concentration.
AIMS: Tacrolimus (TAC) is one of the most successful immunosuppressive drugs in transplantation. Its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacogenetics (PG) have been extensively studied, with many studies showing the influence of CYP3A5 on TAC metabolism and bioavailability. However, data concerning the functional significance of ABCB1 polymorphisms are uncertain due to inconsistent results. We evaluated the association between ABCB1 diplotypes, CYP3A5 polymorphisms and TAC disposition in a cohort of Brazilian transplant recipients. METHODS: Individuals were genotyped for the CYP3A5*3 allele and ABCB1 polymorphisms (2677G>A/T, 1236C>T, 3435C/T) using a TaqMan® PCR technique. Diplotypes were analyzed for correlation with the TAC dose-normalized ratio (Co : dose). RESULTS: We genotyped 108 Brazilian kidney recipients for CYP3A5 (11% CYP3A5*1/*1; 31% CYP3A5*1/*3 and 58% CYP3A5*3/*3) and ABCB1 haplotypes (42% CGC/CGC; 41% GCG/TTT and 17% TTT/TTT). Homozygous subjects for the CYP3A5*3 allele or carriers of the ABCB1 TTT/TTT diplotype showed a higher Co : dose ratio compared with wild type subjects [median (interquartile range) 130.2 (97.5-175.4) vs. 71.3 (45.6-109.0), P < 0.0001 and 151.8 (112.1-205.6) vs. 109.6 (58.1-132.9), P = 0.01, respectively]. When stratified for the CYP3A5*3 group, ABCB1 TTT/TTT individuals showed a higher Co : dose ratio compared with non-TTT/TTT individuals [167.8 (130.4-218.0) vs. 119.4 (100.2-166.3), P = 0.04]. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the effects of CYP3A5 polymorphisms and ABCB1 diplotypes remained significant after correction for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS:CYP3A5 is the major enzyme responsible for the marked interindividual variability in TAC PK, but it cannot be considered alone when predicting dose adjustment because ABCB1 diplotypes also affect TAC disposition, showing independent and additive effects on the TAC dose-normalized concentration.
Authors: Iain A M Macphee; Salim Fredericks; Maha Mohamed; Michelle Moreton; Nicholas D Carter; Atholl Johnston; Lawrence Goldberg; David W Holt Journal: Transplantation Date: 2005-02-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: J S McCune; R L Hawke; E L LeCluyse; H H Gillenwater; G Hamilton; J Ritchie; C Lindley Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Deanna L Kroetz; Christiane Pauli-Magnus; Laura M Hodges; Conrad C Huang; Michiko Kawamoto; Susan J Johns; Doug Stryke; Thomas E Ferrin; Joseph DeYoung; Travis Taylor; Elaine J Carlson; Ira Herskowitz; Kathleen M Giacomini; Andrew G Clark Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2003-08
Authors: Vincent Haufroid; Michel Mourad; Valérie Van Kerckhove; Jeremie Wawrzyniak; Martine De Meyer; Djamila Chaib Eddour; Jacques Malaise; Dominique Lison; Jean-Paul Squifflet; Pierre Wallemacq Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2004-03
Authors: William S Oetting; Baolin Wu; David P Schladt; Weihua Guan; Rory P Remmel; Casey Dorr; Roslyn B Mannon; Arthur J Matas; Ajay K Israni; Pamala A Jacobson Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Nikola Z Stefanović; Tatjana P Cvetković; Tatjana M Jevtović-Stoimenov; Aleksandra M Ignjatović; Goran J Paunović; Radmila M Veličković Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Janaína B F Everton; Fernando J B Patrício; Manuel S Faria; Teresa C A Ferreira; Elen A Romao; Gyl E B Silva; Marcelo Magalhães Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Michelle Liu; Ciara M Shaver; Kelly A Birdwell; Stephanie A Heeney; Christian M Shaffer; Sara L Van Driest Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Paola Krall; Dominique Yañez; Angélica Rojo; Ángela Delucchi; Miguel Córdova; Jorge Morales; Pía Boza; Alonso de la Rivera; Natalie Espinoza; Natalia Armijo; Luis E Castañeda; Mauricio J Farfán; Carolina Salas Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Jesus Ruiz; María José Herrero; Virginia Bosó; Juan Eduardo Megías; David Hervás; Jose Luis Poveda; Juan Escrivá; Amparo Pastor; Amparo Solé; Salvador Francisco Aliño Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 5.923