Literature DB >> 23711242

Have early postoperative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years?

R Shearer1, M Gale, O E Aly, E H Aly.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery has been increasingly used since 1991 following the publication of the first case series. Since then, several studies have confirmed that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is challenging with associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine if the rates of early postoperative complications in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery have improved over the past 20 years.
METHOD: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases between August 1991 and August 2011 was conducted using the keywords laparoscopy, rectal cancer and postoperative complications. Data were analysed using linear regression ANOVA performed in GNUMERICS software.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven studies were included for analysis. Over the last 20 years there has been no significant change in the rate of any early postoperative complications (anastomotic leak, conversion, sexual, urinary or faecal dysfunction, wound infection, overall morbidity or mortality). However, in the last 3 years, the rate of positive resection margins has decreased significantly (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of a statistically significant change in early postoperative complications until 3 years ago. This may reflect the inherent morbidity associated with rectal surgery regardless of the approach used, the limitations of the current laparoscopic instrumentation or the relatively long learning curve. With increasing experience, a repeat analysis in the near future following the publication of ongoing randomized clinical trials might show improved outcomes. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal surgery; complications; laparoscopic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23711242     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  13 in total

1.  Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Ahmed; M Nasir; K Flashman; J Khan; A Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes of salvage therapy in patients with tumour recurrence during 'watch and wait' in rectal cancer.

Authors:  J On; J Shim; E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy: How I Do It.

Authors:  Steven G Leeds; Marissa Mencio; Estrellita Ontiveros; Marc A Ward
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Valentina Lorenzoni; Gregorio Di Franco; Luigi Cobuccio; Matteo Palmeri; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca; Giuseppe Turchetti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques.

Authors:  Seungwan Park; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Electrophysiology-based quality assurance of nerve-sparing in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: Is it worth the effort?

Authors:  D W Kauff; N Wachter; R Bettzieche; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  'Watch and wait' in rectal cancer: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Jason On; Emad H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  [Robot-assisted rectal surgery: hype or progress?].

Authors:  T Becker; J E Egberts; C Schafmayer; H Aselmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.