Literature DB >> 26130943

The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques.

Seungwan Park1, Nam Kyu Kim1.   

Abstract

The conventional laparoscopic approach to rectal surgery has several limitations, and therefore many colorectal surgeons have great expectations for the robotic surgical system as an alternative modality in overcoming challenges of laparoscopic surgery and thus enhancing oncologic and functional outcomes. This review explores the possibility of robotic surgery as an alternative approach in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. The da Vinci® Surgical System was developed specifically to compensate for the technical limitations of laparoscopic instruments in rectal surgery. The robotic rectal surgery is associated with comparable or better oncologic and pathologic outcomes, as well as low morbidity and mortality. The robotic surgery is generally easier to learn than laparoscopic surgery, improving the probability of autonomic nerve preservation and genitourinary function recovery. Furthermore, in very complex procedures such as intersphincteric dissections and transabdominal transections of the levator muscle, the robotic approach is associated with increased performance and safety compared to laparoscopic surgery. The robotic surgery for rectal cancer is an advanced technique that may resolve the issues associated with laparoscopic surgery. However, high cost of robotic surgery must be addressed before it can become the new standard treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advantage; Disadvantage; Laparoscopic Surgery; Rectal Neoplasms; Robotic Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130943      PMCID: PMC4479934          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.7.837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


  67 in total

1.  Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  M W STEARNS; M R DEDDISH
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1959 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.

Authors:  Tae Hyun Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Dong Hyun Choi; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Sung Ho Moon; Hee Jin Chang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; H Leon Pachter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Kaity Sng; Masayasu Hara; Jae-Won Shin; Byung-Eun Yoo; Kyung-Sook Yang; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Mikhail Gincherman; Matthew G Mutch; Elisa H Birnbaum; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Stefanie Kudszus; Christian Roesel; Alexander Schachtrupp; Jörg J Höer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival.

Authors:  Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik; Jin Sil Seong; Hoguen Kim; Jae Kyung Roh; Kang Young Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Se Jin Baek; Sami Al-Asari; Duck Hyoun Jeong; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Update and debate issues in surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nam Kyu Kim; Min Sung Kim; Sami F Al-Asari
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31
View more
  12 in total

1.  Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Dae Ro Lim; Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zairul Azwan Mohd Azman; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-16

Review 3.  The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P C Sivathondan; D G Jayne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; Mercedes Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; M Luisa Reyes-Díaz; Jorge Manuel Vazquez-Monchul; Ana M Garcia-Cabrera; Javier Padillo; Fernando De la Portilla
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Single stage robotic total mesorectal excision-a stepwise approach.

Authors:  Eko Priatno; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2015-12-11

Review 6.  The Future Medical Science and Colorectal Surgeons.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-31

Review 7.  Critical and Challenging Issues in the Surgical Management of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Seung Yoon Yang; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carly R Richards; Scott R Steele; Michael B Lustik; Suzanne M Gillern; Robert B Lim; Justin T Brady; Ali R Althans; Andrew T Schlussel
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-20

9.  Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial.

Authors:  Katie Jones; Mohamed G Qassem; Parv Sains; Mirza K Baig; Muhammad S Sajid
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15

10.  Effects of Sevoflurane versus Propofol on Endogenous Nitric Oxide Metabolism during Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Jing Zhang; Ruiling Zhao; Bin Zhao; Yongzhang Li; Xiaoqing Zhang; Peng Liu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.