| Literature DB >> 23710343 |
Abstract
Laccase production by a temperature and pH tolerant fungal strain (GBPI-CDF-03) isolated from a glacial site in Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) has been investigated. The fungus developed white cottony mass on potato dextrose agar and revealed thread-like mycelium under microscope. ITS region analysis of fungus showed its 100% similarity with Trametes hirsuta. The fungus tolerated temperature from 4 to 48°C ± 2 (25°C opt.) and pH 3-13 (5-7 opt.). Molecular weight of laccase was determined approximately 45 kDa by native PAGE. Amplification of laccase gene fragment (corresponding to the copper-binding conserved domain) contained 200 bp. The optimum pH for laccase production, at optimum growth temperature, was determined between 5.5 and 7.5. In optimization experiments, fructose and ammonium sulfate were found to be the best carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively, for enhancing the laccase production. Production of laccase was favored by high carbon/nitrogen ratio. Addition of CuSO4 (up to 1.0 mM) induced laccase production up to 2-fold, in case of 0.4 mM concentration. Addition of organic solvents also induced the production of laccase; acetone showed the highest (2-fold) induction. The study has implications in bioprospecting of ecologically resilient microbial strains.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23710343 PMCID: PMC3655567 DOI: 10.1155/2013/869062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Enzyme Res ISSN: 2090-0414
Figure 1(a) Microscopic features of the fungus (Bar = 2 μm); (b) laccase production on ABTS plate.
Morphological and molecular characteristics of the fungus (GBPI-CDF-03).
| Character | Description |
|---|---|
| Colony morphology | White cottony mass with no exudation or pigmentation |
|
| |
| Microscopic features | Thread like mycelium with septa showing the characteristic feature of upper fungi |
|
| |
| Growth characters | Temperature requirement between 4 and 48°C (optimum 25°C), pH requirement between 3 and 13 (optimum 5–7) |
|
| |
| Phylogenetic relationship | Maximum similarity (100%) with |
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationship of the fungus.
Ligninolytic efficiency of the fungus (GBPI-CDF-03) at different temperatures.
| Temperature (°C) | Incubation time (days) | ABTS zone dia (mm) (ZD) | Fungal colony dia (mm) (CD) | Ligninolytic efficiency = ZD/CD ∗ 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 21 | 22 | 5 | 440 |
| 9 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 271 |
| 15 | 14 | 15 | 10 | 150 |
| 25 | 7 | 10 | 50 | 20 |
| 35 | 7 | 12 | 46 | 26 |
| 45 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 53 |
Dia: diameter.
Figure 3Zymogram of laccase (L1 and L2) stained with 1% ABTS following native PAGE, M-prestained protein marker.
Production of fungal biomass and protein content at different temperatures.
| Incubation time (days) | Temperature (°C) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 25 | 35 | ||||
| Biomass | Protein | Biomass | Protein | Biomass | Protein | |
| 3 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 36.4 ± 3.1 | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 34.4 ± 6.6 | 5.3 ± 1.1 | 34.6 ± 5.0 |
| 6 | 7.6 ± 0.8 | 44.6 ± 10.7 | 13.0 ± 3.2 | 36.9 ± 8.2 | 13.6 ± 2.0 | 39.4 ± 4.0 |
| 9 | 11.5 ± 2.0 | 54.6 ± 4.4 | 17.9 ± 6.2 | 32.9 ± 4.1 | 18.7 ± 4.4 | 42.9 ± 8.0 |
| 12 | 14.4 ± 2.2 | 66.2 ± 5.7 | 25.6 ± 4.2 | 41.9 ± 6.7 | 22.8 ± 2.8 | 43.6 ± 5.5 |
| 15 | 17.9 ± 3.4 | 68.3 ± 5.8 | 19.8 ± 4.0 | 33.8 ± 5.5 | 19.3 ± 2.4 | 51.1 ± 8.8 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4Effect of different temperatures with respective time on laccase production: (a) 15°C, (b) 25°C, (c) 35°C.
Production of fungal biomass and protein content at different pH.
| pH | Biomass (mg/50 mL) | Protein ( |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | 15.3 ± 3.5 | 19.6 ± 3.9 |
| 5.5 | 24.3 ± 4.5 | 28.0 ± 2.1 |
| 7.5 | 21.3 ± 3.0 | 35.1 ± 4.4 |
| 9.5 | 14.0 ± 2.0 | 30.9 ± 2.8 |
| 11.5 | 8.4 ± 2.6 | 11.12 ± 2.9 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5Effect of pH on laccase production.
Production of fungal biomass and protein content in presence of different carbon and nitrogen sources.
| Carbon source | Biomass | Protein | Nitrogen source | Biomass | Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 24.9 ± 4.0 | 27.0 ± 5.5 | Absence of nitrogen | 21.0 ± 2.2 | 28.6 ± 4.9 |
| Fructose | 19.3 ± 3.0 | 42.3 ± 4.0 | Ammonium nitrate | 28.0 ± 4.5 | 34.6 ± 4.5 |
| Maltose | 15.6 ± 4.0 | 33.6 ± 5.5 | Ammonium sulfate | 23.0 ± 3.6 | 40.0 ± 5.0 |
| Sucrose | 11.3 ± 2.6 | 39.0 ± 6.5 | Ammonium ferrous sulfate | 18.5 ± 2.5 | 38.3 ± 4.5 |
| Starch | 10.5 ± 1.8 | 31.6 ± 5.1 | Potassium nitrate | 25.1 ± 4.5 | 19.6 ± 3.2 |
| Cellulose | 9.5 ± 1.0 | 26.1 ± 7.6 | Urea | 16.4 ± 4.1 | 41.6 ± 4.0 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 6Effect of nutritional parameters on laccase production: (a) carbon sources: G (glucose), F (fructose), M (maltose), S (sucrose), St. (starch), C (cellulose); (b) nitrogen sources: AbN (absence of inorganic nitrogen), AN (ammonium nitrate), AS (ammonium sulfate), AFS (ammonium ferrous sulfate), KN (potassium nitrate); (c) CuSO4 concentration (0.2 to 1.0 mM) (d) organic solvents: C (control), M (methanol), E (ethanol), A (acetone), I (iso-propanol).
Laccase activity, fungal biomass, and protein content with different concentrations of fructose and ammonium sulfate.
| Fructose (%) | Laccase | Biomass | Protein | Ammonium | Laccase | Biomass | Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 248.0 ± 6.5 | 22.4 ± 6.8 | 31.6 ± 4.0 | Control | 260.0 ± 8.9 | 26.1 ± 4.4 | 22.3 ± 4.9 |
| 0.2 (1 : 1) | 335.0 ± 14.3 | 28.7 ± 1.5 | 45.2 ± 6.6 | 0.2 (1 : 1) | 344.0 ± 14.1 | 29.6 ± 4.5 | 38.3 ± 8.5 |
| 0.4 (2 : 1) | 435.0 ± 35.5 | 31.8 ± 3.6 | 65.3 ± 8.7 | 0.4 (1 : 2) | 194.0 ± 23.6 | 27.2 ± 4.4 | 33.6 ± 7.7 |
| 0.6 (3 : 1) | 374.0 ± 31.2 | 34.3 ± 4.0 | 69.6 ± 4.5 | 0.6 (1 : 3) | 154.0 ± 4.7 | 25.5 ± 2.2 | 32.3 ± 3.7 |
| 0.8 (4 : 1) | 336.0 ± 11.8 | 36.5 ± 3.4 | 84.3 ± 10.0 | 0.8 (1 : 4) | 133.0 ± 7.1 | 24.6 ± 5.0 | 30.6 ± 3.5 |
| 1.0 (5 : 1) | 310.0 ± 9.4 | 37.3 ± 4.5 | 108.6 ± 13.3 | 1.0 (1 : 5) | 130.0 ± 3.3 | 25.8 ± 4.9 | 26.0 ± 4.3 |
Values given in parentheses depict the carbon/nitrogen ratio; values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Production of fungal biomass and protein content in presence of different concentrations of CuSO4 and different solvents (0.2%).
| CuSO4 (mM) | Biomass | Protein | Solvent | Biomass | Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 16.8 ± 2.5 | 35.6 ± 6.6 | Control | 25.3 ± 3.0 | 23.9 ± 3.4 |
| 0.4 | 13.1 ± 3.3 | 44.0 ± 6.5 | Methanol | 16.1 ± 3.6 | 38.1 ± 4.0 |
| 0.6 | 11.7 ± 0.9 | 46.6 ± 7.0 | Ethanol | 16.6 ± 2.0 | 41.8 ± 5.7 |
| 0.8 | 8.3 ± 3.0 | 54.0 ± 5.5 | Acetone | 18.4 ± 2.2 | 45.2 ± 6.1 |
| 1.0 | 7.1 ± 2.5 | 55.1 ± 7.2 | Isopropanol | 13.0 ± 2.5 | 38.3 ± 5.6 |
Control value for biomass = 24.0 ± 3.8, and protein = 31.2 ± 2.5; values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Laccase activity, fungal biomass, and protein content with different concentrations of acetone.
| Acetone | Laccase | Biomass | Protein |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 263 ± 9.4 | 21.8 ± 3.8 | 25.1 ± 3.6 |
| 0.2 | 542 ± 1.6 | 17.7 ± 1.5 | 45.4 ± 5.9 |
| 0.4 | 397 ± 1.4 | 17.0 ± 3.0 | 41.1 ± 6.0 |
| 0.6 | 349 ± 1.0 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | 41.0 ± 6.0 |
| 0.8 | 227 ± 1.1 | 13.3 ± 3.5 | 35.7 ± 4.5 |
| 1.0 | 201 ± 1.7 | 11.0 ± 3.0 | 31.5 ± 4.0 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).