Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of some novel 1,2,4-triazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives.

ABSTRACT: This study presents the synthesis and spectral analysis of new derivatives of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and 1,3,4-thiadiazole. New compounds were prepared by cyclization reaction of acyl thiosemicarbazide derivatives in the presence of alkaline and acidic media. All synthesized compounds were screened for their in vitro antibacterial activity by using the agar dilution technique. Six of the compounds had potential activity against Gram-positive bacteria (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 15.63-500 μg/mL). Some compounds showed good activity especially against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 (MIC = 15.63-250 μg/mL), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC = 31.25-250 μg/mL), and Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240 (MIC = 125-250 μg/mL).

Introduction

For the last few decades, there has been a tremendous growth of research in the synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur containing heterocyclic derivatives because of their utility in various applications, such as pharmaceuticals, propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.

The recent literature is enriched with progressive findings about the synthesis and pharmacological action of triazole and thiadiazole derivatives. Heterocycles bearing 1,2,4-triazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety are reported to show a broad spectrum of biologic activity such as analgesic (Turan-Zitouni et al., 1999), antiphlogistic (Harish et al., 2008; El Shehry et al., 2010; Schenone et al., 2006), anticonvulsant (Dogan et al., 2002; Almasirad et al., 2004), antitumor (Duran et al., 2002; Kumar et al., 2010), antiviral (Al-Soud et al., 2004), antifungal (Collin et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2006), antibacterial (Ulusoy et al., 2001; Gülerman et al., 2001; Padmavathi et al., 2009; Demirbas et al., 2009; Liesen et al., 2010), and antitubercular action (Klimešová et al., 2004; Gadad et al., 2004; Shiradkar et al., 2007). A large number of ring systems containing triazoles and thiadiazoles have been incorporated into a wide variety of therapeutically interesting drug candidates. Some of them are approved as drugs, for example, alprazolam (Pick, 1997), etizolam (Shiroki et al., 1976), or vibunazole (Holmwood et al., 1982). Vorozole, letrozole, and anastrozole are non-steroidal drugs used for the treatment of cancer (Clemons et al., 2004). Triazoles are also used as intermediates for the synthesis of antifungal agents such as fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole (Bailey et al., 1990; McGinnis et al., 1997).

In continuation of our research program on the synthesis of 1,2,4-triazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole compounds exhibiting biologic activity, it was thought to be interesting to synthesize new antimicrobial agents, especially when the development of resistance of pathogenic bacteria toward available antibiotics is rapidly becoming a major worldwide problem. The designing of new compounds to deal with resistant bacteria has become one of the most important areas of antibacterial research today. In addition, primary and opportunistic microbial infections continue to increase rapidly because of the increased number of immunocompromised patients.

Keeping in mind the above facts, we designed and synthesized series of some new 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives and evaluated their in vitro antibacterial activity.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

The substituted 1,2,4-triazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives are generally obtained by the cyclization reaction of thiosemicarbazide derivatives, which is dependent not only on the pH of the medium, but also on the nature of substituents in thiosemicarbazide derivatives (Dobosz and Pachuta-Stec, 1995, 1996). The presence of alkaline media usually promotes the reaction of cyclization to obtain 1,2,4-triazole systems, whereas in acidic media, 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives were obtained.

4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 1 was a starting material for the synthesis of new compounds, which consist of two 1,2,4-triazole systems or 1,2,4-triazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole systems connected with the S-methylene group. Compound 1 was obtained by the cyclization reaction of 1,4-diphenyl thiosemicarbazide in alkaline media. In the next step, compound 1, which can exist in two tautomeric forms, was submitted to the reaction with ethyl bromoacetate in the presence of sodium ethanolate. The reaction let us obtain ethyl 2-[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl] acetate (2). The direction of this reaction to form a thio derivative of compound 1 was revealed and confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Dobosz et al., 1996). The mechanism of this reaction as a nucleophilic substitution on the sulfur atom had been studied and investigated earlier (Wujec and Paneth, 2007).

Subsequently, compound 2 was converted to hydrazide 3 in reaction with 100 % hydrazine hydrate. Then, reactions of hydrazide 3 with various isothiocyanates were performed in two ways.

All new thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a–l were obtained by heating reactants in an oil bath; temperatures were selected experimentally (t = 50–110 °C). Thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a, c, d were products of the reaction of hydrazide 3 with appropriate isothiocyanates in the presence of diethyl ether carried in room temperature.

A new group of compounds, which consist of two 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 5a–i, were acquired in cyclization reaction with 2 % aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide of new acyl thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a–i.

In three cases, the cyclization reaction of thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4j–l in alkaline media was accompanied by hydrolysis. The [(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl] acetic acid 8 was obtained in cyclization of 4-ethoxycarbonyl-1-substituted thiosemicarbazide 4j. This compound was described earlier, but it was obtained in a different way (Kaplaushenko et al., 2008). The cyclization in alkaline media of the thiosemicarbazide which contains the ethoxycarbonylmethyl group 4k and benzoyl 4l in the fourth position led us to obtain substituted 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 9, 10. These compounds were subjected to the reaction with pyrrolidine and formaldehyde to get new N-substituted 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 11, 12.

The thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a–i were also submitted to the cyclization reaction in acidic media. In this way, we were able to obtain new compounds which consist of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and 1,3,4-thiadiazole system, that is (5-aminosubstituted)-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole 6a–i. Afterward, the derivatives of N,N-disubstituted acetamide 7a–i were obtained by the acylation reaction of 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazoles 6a–i with acetic anhydride.

The mechanism of cyclization of thiosemicarbazide was investigated earlier (Siwek and Paneth, 2007). It was proved that the direction of cyclization is dependent on the nature of substituents and acidic or alkaline media (Siwek et al., 2010).

The structure of all obtained compounds was confirmed by elementary analysis, IR and 1H NMR spectra. Some of the compounds were also submitted to 13C NMR and MS spectra analyses. The crystal structure of the representative compound 2 was determined by the single-crystal X-ray analysis. The reactions were performed according to Schemes 1 and 2.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of new derivatives of thiosemicabrazide, 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and 1,3,4-thiadiazole

Scheme 2

Synthesis of new derivatives of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione

In the IR spectra of the thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a–l, the following characteristic absorption bands were observed: about 1,700 cm−1 corresponding to the C=O group and in the range of 1,300 cm−1 corresponding to the C=S group. Compounds which consist of two 1,2,4-triazole systems 5a–i, 9, 10 had absorption bands: about 1,300 cm−1 (C=S group), about 1,500 cm−1 (C–N group), in the range of 1,600 cm−1 (C=N group), and about 3,100–3,200 cm−1 (NH group). Then, in the IR spectra of the new derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazole 6a–i, the following characteristic absorption bands were observed: in the range of 1,500 cm−1 corresponding to the C–N group and in the range of 1,600 cm−1 corresponding to the C=N group and about 3,200 cm−1 for the NH group. Compounds 7a–i, 11 had a characteristic absorption band at about 1,700 cm−1 for the C=O group.

1H NMR spectra of the thiosemicarbazide derivatives 4a–l show three proton signals typical for the NH group in the δ 8.32–12.87 ppm range, whereas for the new compounds consisting of two 1,2,4-triazole system 5a–i, 9, 10, one proton signal of the NH group was observed in the δ 13.62–14.13 ppm range. The 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives 6a–i had one typical proton signal of the NH group in the δ 9.35–10.47 ppm range. Derivatives of N,N-disubstituted acetamide 7a–i had one proton signal of the CH3 group in the δ 2.06–2.16 ppm range. Compound 11 had one proton signal for the OH group (δ 13.68 ppm) and for the pyrrolidine substituent. Similarly, 4,5-disubstituted-2-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 12 had one typical proton signal for the NH group (δ 14.68 ppm) and for the pyrrolidine substituent.

Compound 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n with one molecule in the asymmetric unit of the crystal. The diffraction study confirmed that the molecule contained the 1,2,4-triazole ring, substituted at C3, N4, and C5 atoms by thioacetate moiety and two phenyl rings, respectively (Fig. 1). The chain of atoms from S1 to ethyl C4 is almost planar (rmsd = 0.006 Å); a higher twist (4.56°) is observed around the C4–O1 bond in the solid state. The best plane of the atoms of thioacetate unit intersects that of the 1,2,4-triazole ring at the angle of 81.4(1)°. The carbonyl C2=O2 group in 2 is cis oriented with respect to the thioether S1 atom. What is more, it seems to be preferred in thioacetate derivatives in the solid state (CSD, V.5.33, Allen, 2002). The geometric parameters of the ester group are within normal ranges (International Tables for Crystallography, 1995). Likewise, the S1–C3 and S1–C1 distances, being of 1.738(2) and 1.789(3) Å, are in agreement with the single thioether C–S bonds. The most characteristic feature of the crystal of 2 is the presence of centrosymmetric molecular dimers. The “head-to-head” oriented molecules within the dimer form short S1···O2i [3.268(3) Å; (i) 1 − x, −y, −z] contacts which might be attractive in their nature (Ramasubbu and Parthasarathy, 1989).

Fig. 1

Molecular structure of 2 with atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond distances (Ǻ): C3–S1 1.738(2), C1–S1 1.789(3), C1–C2 1.494(4), C2–O1 1.321(3), C2–O2 1.191(3), C4–O1 1.460(3)

Microbiology

On the basis of the preliminary results obtained by the agar dilution method, it was shown that some of the newly synthesized compounds had the potential activity against reference strains of Gram-positive bacteria. None of the compounds had inhibitory effect on the Gram-negative bacteria growth.

According to Table 1, on the basis of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained by the broth microdilution method, it was shown that the highest activity had compound 4l with MIC = 31.25 μg/mL against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, MIC = 125 μg/mL against Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876, and Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240 or MIC = 250 μg/mL against S. aureus ATCC 6538 and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Compound 6h was also active especially against B. subtilis ATCC 6633 with MIC = 15.63 μg/mL and with MIC = 125 μg/mL against M. luteus ATCC 10240 or MIC = 250 μg/mL against S. aureus ATCC 25923.

Table 1

The inhibitory activities of newly synthesized compounds against Gram-positive bacteria on the basis of MIC (μg/mL) values determined by broth microdilution method

Species:	Sa25923	Sa6538	Se12228	Bs6633	Bc10876	Ml10240
Compounds	MIC (μg/mL)
4c	>1000	>1000	>1000	1000	1000	1000
4i	500	1000	500	500	1000	1000
4j	>1000	>1000	1000	500	500	1000
4l	31.25	250	125	250	125	125
5b	1000	1000	1000	1000	1000	1000
5c	500	250	500	500	1000	250
5d	1000	>1000	>1000	>1000	500	>1000
5g	1000	>1000	>1000	>1000	500	>1000
5h	1000	1000	1000	>1000	>1000	1000
5i	>1000	1000	>1000	>1000	>1000	>1000
6h	250	nd	500	15.63	nd	125
Cefuroxime	0.49	1.95	0.24	0.49	62.5	0.49

Bold values indicate the lowest MIC nd Not determined, Sa25923 S. aureus ATCC 25923, Sa6538 S. aureus ATCC 6538, Se12228 S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, Bs6633 B. subtilis ATCC 6633, Bc10876 B. cereus ATCC 10876, Ml10240 M. luteus ATCC 10240

The somewhat lower activity against reference strains of Gram-positive bacteria was shown by compound 5c (MIC values from 250 to 1,000 μg/mL). According to our results, MICs of cefuroxime, which has been extensively used to treat bacterial infections, were 0.24–1.95 μg/mL for Staphylococcus species and 0.49–62.5 μg/mL for the other Gram-positive bacteria.

With our research, it has been established that the introduction of the benzoyl group in thiosemicarbazide and the benzyl group in 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivative yielded active compounds endowed with a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities.

The compounds 4l and 6h with potential activity against the reference strains of Gram-positive bacteria may be regarded as precursor compounds for searching for new derivatives showing antimicrobial activity against pathogenic (e.g. S. aureus) or opportunistic (e.g. S. epidermidis, M. luteus, B. subtilis, or B. cereus) bacteria.

Experimental

Melting points were determined in Fisher–Johns blocks (Pittsburgh, US) and presented without any corrections. The IR spectra (ν, cm−1) were recorded in KBr tablets using a Specord IR-75 spectrophotometer (Germany). The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 300 apparatus (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten/Karlsruhe, Germany) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d 6 with TMS as the internal standard, and chemical shifts are given in ppm (δ-scale). The MS spectra were recorded on a Thermo-Finnigan Trace DSQ GC MS apparatus (Waltham, Massachusetts, US). Chemicals were purchased from Merck Co., or Lancaster and used without further purification.

The purity of the obtained compounds was checked by TLC on aluminum oxide 60 F254 plates (Merck Co., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, US), in a CHCl3/C2H5OH (10:1, v/v) solvent system with UV visualization (λ = 254 nm).

Elemental analysis of the obtained compounds was performed for C, H, N, S. The maximum percentage differences between calculated and found values for each element were within the error and amounted to ±0.4 %.

Crystal data for 2

C18H17N3O2S, colorless prism, 0.45 × 0.29 × 0.14 mm3, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 11.692(1) Å, b = 9.414(1) Å, c = 15.740(2) Å, β = 100.24(1)°, V = 1,704.9(3) Å3, Z = 4, d calc = 1.322 g cm−3, μ = 0.205 mm−1, GooF = 0.977, data/restraints/parameters 3930/0/217 (R int = 0.04), final R indices (I > 2σ(I)): R 1 = 0.0548, wR 2 = 0.0888, R indices (all data): R 1 = 0.1867, wR 2 = 0.1202, largest diff. peak and hole: 0.16 and −0.17 e Å−3.

Single-crystal diffraction data were measured at room temperature on an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with the graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073). The programs CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis Red (Oxford Diffraction, Xcalibur CCD System, 2006) were used for data collection, cell refinement, and data reduction. The intensity data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 and refined by the full-matrix least-squares on F 2 using the SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 2008). All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All H-atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atoms with U iso(H) = 1.2 U eq(C).

Crystallographic data have been deposited with the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44 1223 366033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk) and are available on request, quoting the deposition number CCDC 860357.

Ethyl 2-[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetate (2)

Method A

0.23 g (10 mmol) of sodium was added to 5 mL of anhydrous ethanol. The solution was placed in a three-necked flask equipped with reflux condenser and closed with a tube of CaCl2 and mercury stirred. The content was mixed till the sodium dissolved completely and then 2.53 g (10 mmol) of 4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (1) was added. Then, 1.22 mL ethyl bromoacetate was added drop by drop. The content of the flask was mixed for 4 h and left at room temperature for 12 h. Then, 10 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added and heated for 1 h. The mixture was filtered of inorganic compounds. After cooling, the precipitate was filtered and crystallized from ethanol.

Method B

2.53 g (10 mmol) of 4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (1) was dissolved in 10 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide. Then, 1 g of potassium carbonate and 1.22 mL of ethyl bromoacetate were added to the solution. The content of the flask was refluxed for 2 h. The mixture was filtered of inorganic compounds. Then, the distilled water was added and the precipitated compound was filtered, dried, and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 67.8 %, mp: 92–94 °C (dec.). Analysis for C18H17N3O2S (339.41); calculated: C, 63.70; H, 5.05; N, 12.38; S, 9.45; found: C, 63.92; H, 5.03; N, 12.41; S, 9.48. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3091 (CH aromatic), 2955, 1422 (CH aliphatic), 1701 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 676 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.19 (t, J = 6 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.09 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.11–4.17 (q, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 7.31–7.58 (m, 10H, 10ArH).

[(4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl] acetohydrazide (3)

0.5 mL of 100 % hydrazine hydrate was added to 3.39 g (10 mmol) of compound 2 in 10 mL of anhydrous ethanol. The mixture was left at room temperature for 24 h. The precipitation of hydrazide 3 was filtered, dried, and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 91.4 %, mp: 196–198 °C (dec.). Analysis for C16H15N5OS (325.39); calculated: C, 59.06; H, 4.65; N, 21.52; S, 9.82; found: C, 59.10; H, 4.63; N, 21.49; S, 9.78. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3105 (CH aromatic), 2980, 1423 (CH aliphatic), 1698 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1522 (C–N), 699 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.91 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.31 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.31–7.57 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 9.40 (brs, 1H, NH).

Derivatives of thiosemicarbazide (4a–l)

General method (for compounds 4a–l)

A mixture of 3.25 g (10 mmol) of hydrazide (3) and 10 mmol appropriate isothiocyanate was heated in an oil bath at 50–110 °C for 8–20 h. The product was washed with diethyl ether to remove unreacted isothiocyanate. Then it was filtered, dried, and crystallized from ethanol 4a–c, d, g–l, butanol 4e, or methanol 4f.

Method B (for compounds 4a, c, d)

10 mmol of appropriate isothiocyanate was added to 3.25 g (10 mmol) of hydrazide 3 in 10 mL of anhydrous diethyl ether. The mixture, placed in a conical bulb, was mixed for 5 min and left in room temperature for 24 h. The precipitation of thiosemicarbazide 4a, c, d was filtered, dried, and crystallized from ethanol. The obtained compounds had the same melting points as the compounds obtained by the general method.

4-Ethyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4a)

Yield: 94.0 %. Temperature of reaction: 70 °C for 8 h, mp: 205–207 °C (dec.). Analysis for C19H20N6OS2 (412.53); calculated: C, 55.32; H, 4.89; N, 20.37; S, 15.54; found: C, 55.23; H, 4.88; N, 20.43; S, 15.59. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3199 (NH), 3101 (CH aromatic), 2974, 1453, 741 (CH aliphatic), 1699 (C=O), 1607 (C=N), 1519 (C–N), 1329 (C=S), 691 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.12 (t, J = 9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.51–3.60 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.90 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.34–7.57 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 8.32, 9.33, 10.25 (3brs, 3H, 3NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 14.61 (CH3), 30.75 (–S–CH2–), 33.90 (–CH2–CH3), 126.42, 127.68, 127.95, 128.79, 130.07, 130.11 (10CH aromatic), 130.33, 133.65 (2C aromatic), 152.08 (C–S), 154.59 (C-3 triazole), 166.82 (C=O), 181.23 (C=S). MS m/z (%): 412 (M+, 2), 397 (3), 335 (2), 325 (5), 294 (26), 253 (61), 252 (100), 194 (21), 180 (20), 149 (20), 118 (23), 104 (25), 91 (44), 77 (79).

4-Allyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4b)

Yield: 90.7 %. Temperature of reaction: 55 °C for 12 h, mp: 192–194 °C (dec.). Analysis for C20H20N6OS2 (424.54); calculated: C, 56.58; H, 4.75; N, 19.79; S, 15.10; found: C, 56.53; H, 4.76; N, 19.81; S, 15.14. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3218 (NH), 3078 (CH aromatic), 2963, 1431, 761 (CH aliphatic), 1705 (C=O), 1603 (C=N), 1511 (C–N), 1351 (C=S), 686 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.95 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.13 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.02–5.13 (dd, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, =CH2), 5.79–5.90 (m, 1H, CH), 7.35–7.57 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 8.45, 9.45, 10.33 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Cyclohexyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4c)

Yield: 64.5 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 12 h, mp: 188–190 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H26N6OS2 (466.62); calculated: C, 59.20; H, 5.62; N, 18.01; S, 13.74; found: C, 59.35; H, 5.63; N, 17.95; S, 13.70. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3208 (NH), 3109 (CH aromatic), 2987, 1424, 753 (CH aliphatic), 1699 (C=O), 1595 (C=N), 1519 (C–N), 1331 (C=S), 689 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.01–1.72 (m, 10H, 5CH2 cyclohexane), 3.87 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.31 (m, 1H, CH cyclohexane), 7.28–7.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 8.71, 9.35, 10.20 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Phenyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4d)

Yield: 91.0 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 15 h, mp: 178–180 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H20N6OS2 (460.57); calculated: C, 59.98; H, 4.38; N, 18.25; S, 13.92; found: C, 60.03; H, 4.38; N, 18.30; S, 13.96. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3205 (NH), 3114 (CH aromatic), 2978 (CH aliphatic), 1705 (C=O), 1610 (C=N), 1516 (C–N), 1337 (C=S), 685 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.00 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.12–7.51 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 9.38, 9.76, 10.47 (3brs, 3H, 3NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 34.55 (–S–CH2–), 125.23, 125.79, 126.45, 127.77, 127.92, 128.09, 128.75, 130.07, 130.15 (15CH aromatic), 130.36, 133.78, 139.09 (3C aromatic), 151.75 (C–S), 154.48 (C-3 triazole), 166.95 (C=O), 180.98 (C=S). MS m/z (%): 460 (M+, 1), 383 (1.2), 325 (13), 294 (20), 252 (60), 194 (10), 180 (10), 149 (8), 135 (74), 131 (5), 104 (25), 91 (33), 77 (100).

4-(4-Bromophenyl)-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4e)

Yield: 88.3 %. Temperature of reaction: 110 °C for 16 h, mp: 188–190 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H19BrN6OS2 (539.47); calculated: C, 51.21; H, 3.55; N, 15.58; S, 11.88; Br, 14.81; found: C, 51.27; H, 3.54; N, 15.61; S, 11.92. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3213 (NH), 3116 (CH aromatic), 2972 (CH aliphatic), 1703 (C=O), 1600 (C=N), 1341 (C=S), 690 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.97 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.29–7.55 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 9.79, 9.82, 10.46 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4f)

Yield: 97.8 %.Temperature of reaction: 100 °C for 16 h, mp: 180–184 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H19ClN6OS2 (495.02); calculated: C, 55.80; H, 3.87; N, 16.98; S, 12.95; Cl, 9.16; found: C, 55.83; H, 3.88; N, 16.93; S, 12.90. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3202 (NH), 3093 (CH aromatic), 2983 (CH aliphatic), 1705 (C=O), 1608 (C=N), 1338 (C=S), 688 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.98 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.31–7.56 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 9.81, 9.88, 10.46 (3brs, 3H, 3NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 34.39 (–S–CH2–), 121.95, 125.63, 128.40, 128.56, 128.76, 129.37, 129.54, 130.08 (14CH aromatic), 128.60, 130.19, 133.65, 137.92 (4C aromatic), 151.63 (C–S), 154.30 (C-3 triazole), 166.85 (C=O), 180.84 (C=S).

4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4g)

Yield: 95.2 %.Temperature of reaction: 60 °C for 18 h, mp: 172–174 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H22N6O2S2 (490.60); calculated: C, 58.75; H, 4.52; N, 17.13; S, 13.07; found: C, 58.97; H, 4.51; N, 17.18; S, 13.10. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3198 (NH), 3102 (CH aromatic), 2988, 1452, 759 (CH aliphatic), 1710 (C=O), 1605 (C=N), 1519 (C–N), 1329 (C=S), 693 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.74 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.99 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.90 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H, 2ArH), 7.32–7.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 7.57 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H, 2ArH), 9.61, 9.66, 10.40 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Benzyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4h)

Yield: 95.0 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 12 h, mp: 176–180 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H22N6OS2 (474.60); calculated: C, 60.74; H, 4.67; N, 17.71; S, 13.51; found: C, 60.77; H, 4.66; N, 17.78; S, 13.55. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3209 (NH), 3087 (CH aromatic), 2971, 1439 (CH aliphatic), 1700 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1520 (C–N), 1351 (C=S), 689 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.90 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.84 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.15–7.54 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 8.82, 9.54, 10.41 (3brs, 3H, 3NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 33.68 (–S–CH2–), 46.62 (–CH2–), 126.47, 127.12, 127.46, 127.83, 128.16, 128.51, 128.83, 129.83, 130.04 (15CH aromatic), 133.71, 134.71, 139.34 (3C aromatic), 151.95 (C–S), 154.32 (C-3 triazole), 166.79 (C=O), 182.09 (C=S).

4-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4i)

Yield: 97.4 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 14 h, mp: 176–178 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H24N6O2S2 (504.63); calculated: C, 59.50; H, 4.79; N, 16.65; S, 12.71; found: C, 59.61; H, 4.78; N, 16.68; S, 12.75. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3222 (NH), 3102 CH (aromatic), 2973, 1448, 767 (CH aliphatic), 1697 (C=O), 1599 (C=N), 1514 (C–N), 1349 (C=S), 680 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.01 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.74 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.86–7.64 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 8.33, 9.55, 10.44 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Ethoxycarbonyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4j)

Yield: 98.6 %. Temperature of reaction: 55 °C for 14 h, mp: 178–180 °C (dec.). Analysis for C20H20N6O3S2 (456.54); calculated: C, 52.62; H, 4.41; N, 18.41; S, 14.05; found: C, 52.76; H, 4.42; N, 18.44; S, 14.01. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3219 (NH), 3105 (CH aromatic), 2973, 1452, 765 (CH aliphatic), 1728 (C=O acidic), 1699 (C=O), 1608 (C=N), 1511 (C–N), 1338 (C=S), 691 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.22 (t, J = 5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.09 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.12–4.21 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 7.28–7.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 11.07, 11.38, 11.51 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Ethoxycarbonylmethyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4k)

Yield: 91.9 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 14 h, mp: 188–190 °C (dec.). Analysis for C21H22N6O3S2 (470.57); calculated: C, 53.60; H, 4.71; N, 17.86; S, 13.63; found: C, 53.46; H, 4.72; N, 17.90; S, 13.67. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3211 (NH), 3096 (CH aromatic), 2975, 1464, 758 (CH aliphatic), 1737 (C=O acidic), 1703 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1511 (C–N), 1344 (C=S), 686 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.16 (t, J = 5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.96 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.02–4.11 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.30 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.33–7.58 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 8.78, 9.69, 10.47 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

4-Benzoyl-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide (4l)

Yield: 96.8 %. Temperature of reaction: 50 °C for 20 h, mp: 180–182 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H20N6O2S2 (488.58); calculated: C, 59.00; H, 4.13; N, 17.20; S, 13.12; found: C, 58.95; H, 4.12; N, 17.26; S, 13.08. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3176 (NH), 3088 (CH aromatic), 2979, 1449 (CH aliphatic), 1746 (C=O acidic), 1703 (C=O), 1608 (C=N), 1509 (C–N), 1311 (C=S), 681 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.15 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.35–7.96 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 11.33, 11.77, 12.87 (3brs, 3H, 3NH).

Derivatives of 4,5-disubstituted-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5a–i)

General procedure

A mixture of thiosemicarbazide 4a–i (10 mmol) and 20–40 mL of 2 % aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was refluxed for 2 h. Then, the solution was neutralized with diluted hydrochloric acid and the formed precipitate was filtered and crystallized from ethanol 5c, d, h, i, butanol 5b, e, f, or methanol 5a, g.

4-Ethyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5a)

Yield: 87.6 %, mp: 214–216 °C (dec.). Analysis for C19H18N6S2 (394.52); calculated: C, 57.84; H, 4.60; N, 21.30; S, 16.25; found: C, 57.67; H, 4.59; N, 21.33; S, 16.21. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3135 (NH), 3085 (CH aromatic), 2958, 1422, 758 (CH aliphatic), 1600 (C=N), 1502 (C–N), 1350 (C=S), 692 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.22 (t, J = 5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.91–3.97 (q, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.39 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.27–7.54 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 13.62 (s, 1H, NH). MS m/z (%): 394 (M+, 0.2), 365 (0.1), 339 (0.12), 264 (0.1), 253 (64), 252 (68), 194 (21), 149 (33), 128 (16), 118 (37), 104 (10), 91 (58), 77 (100).

4-Allyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5b)

Yield: 90.5 %, mp: 207–208 °C (dec.). Analysis for C20H18N6S2 (406.53); calculated: C, 59.10; H, 4.46; N, 20.67; S, 15.77; found: C, 58.96; H, 4.45; N, 20.64; S, 15.74. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3185 (NH), 3091 (CH aromatic), 2989, 1450, 756 (CH aliphatic), 1604 (C=N), 1510 (C–N), 1343 (C=S), 684 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.44 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.69–4.71 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.24–5.41 (dd, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, =CH2), 5.82–5.93 (m, 1H, CH), 7.37–7.62 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 13.81 (brs, 1H, NH).

4-Cyclohexyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5c)

Yield: 62.4 %, mp: 186–188 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H24N6S2 (448.61); calculated: C, 61.58; H, 5.39; N, 18.73; S, 14.29; found: C, 61.37; H, 5.38; N, 18.68; S, 14.32. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3175 (NH), 3088 (CH aromatic), 2963, 1449, 759 (CH aliphatic), 1611 (C=N), 1505 (C–N), 1339 (C=S), 684 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.05–1.73 (m, 10H, 5CH2 cyclohexane), 4.04 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.45 (m, 1H, CH cyclohexane), 7.29–7.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 14.13 (brs, 1H, NH).

4-Phenyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5d)

Yield: 76.9 %, mp: 209–210 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H18N6S2 (442.56); calculated: C, 62.42; H, 4.10; N, 18.99; S, 14.49; found: C, 62.28; H, 4.09; N, 18.93; S, 14.51. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3175 (NH), 3090 (CH aromatic), 2972 (CH aliphatic), 1598 (C=N), 1505 (C–N), 1326 (C=S), 684 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.14 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.12–7.59 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 13.86 (brs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 26.22 (–S–CH2–), 125.61, 128.44, 128.55, 128.63, 128.74, 129.23, 129.41, 129.58, 130.11 (15CH aromatic), 138.23, 146.83, 148.15 (3C aromatic), 150.65 (C-3′ triazole), 153.33 (C–S), 166.98 (C-3 triazole), 167.42 (C=S). MS m/z (%): 442 (M+, 2), 306 (1), 294 (1), 252 (98), 194 (23), 149 (18), 127 (14), 118 (44), 104 (8), 91 (27), 77 (100).

4-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5e)

Yield: 97.2 %, mp: 210–212 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H17BrN6S2 (521.45); calculated: C, 52.98; H, 3.29; N, 16.12; S, 12.30; Br, 15.32; found: C, 52.93; H, 3.28; N, 16.15; S, 12.32. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3178 (NH), 3102 (CH aromatic), 2965, 1448 (CH aliphatic), 1609 (C=N), 1504 (C–N), 1367 (C=S), 688 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.17 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.14–7.46 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 13.89 (brs, 1H, NH).

4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5f)

Yield: 96.0 %, mp: 118–120 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H17ClN6S2 (477.00); calculated: C, 57.91; H, 3.59; N, 17.62; S, 13.44; Cl, 7.43; found: C, 57.85; H, 3.58; N, 17.65; S, 13.41. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3143 (NH), 3088 (CH aromatic), 2985, 1459 (CH aliphatic), 1601 (C=N), 1500 (C–N), 1361 (C=S), 690 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.17 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.22–7.58 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 13.89 (brs, 1H, NH).

4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5g)

Yield: 98.3 %, mp: 206–208 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H20N6OS2 (472.58); calculated: C, 60.99; H, 4.26; N, 17.78; S, 13.57; found: C, 61.16; H, 4.25; N, 17.71; S, 13.61. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3164 (NH), 3094 (CH aromatic), 2969, 1441 (CH aliphatic), 1612 (C=N), 1506 (C–N), 1319 (C=S), 691 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.80 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.14 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.03–7.59 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 13.82 (brs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR δ (ppm): 27.55 (–S–CH2–), 55.56 (CH3), 114.56, 125.67, 127.62, 128.33, 128.67, 129.32, 129.55, 130.11 (14CH aromatic), 133.71, 134.62, 139.61, 159.81 (4C aromatic), 150.51 (C-3′ triazole), 154.73 (C–S), 168.42 (C-3 triazole), 168.61 (C=S). MS m/z (%): 472 (M+, 0.07), 457 (0.03), 440 (0.02), 339 (0.21), 306 (0.05), 294 (0.11), 268 (11), 252 (59), 209 (7), 194 (15), 149 (12), 135 (86), 118 (13), 104 (10), 91 (27), 77 (100).

4-Benzyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5h)

Yield: 79.0 %, mp: 136–140 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H20N6S2 (456.58); calculated: C, 63.13; H, 4.41; N, 18.41; S, 14.04; found: C, 63.26; H, 4.42; N, 18.35; S, 14.08. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3155 (NH), 3091 (CH aromatic) 2961, 1453, 762 (CH aliphatic), 1609 (C=N), 1508 (C–N), 1342 (C=S), 677 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.29 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.22–7.53 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 13.86 (brs, 1H, NH).

4-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (5i)

Yield: 98.5 %, mp: 118–120 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H22N6OS2 (486.61); calculated: C, 61.70; H, 4.56; N, 17.27; S, 13.18; found: C, 61.61; H, 4.55; N, 17.25; S, 13.14. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3174 (NH), 3071 (CH aromatic), 2982, 1453, 764 (CH aliphatic), 1612 (C=N), 1510 (C–N), 1358 (C=S), 673 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.71 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.33 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.20 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.83–7.52 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 13.82 (brs, 1H, NH).

Derivatives of 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6a–i)

Method A (for compounds 6a–i)

10 mmol of 4-substituted-1-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetyl} thiosemicarbazide 4a–i was dissolved in 10–20 mL diluted sulfuric acid and stirred in a closed bulb for 1 h. Subsequently, the solution was poured out on crushed ice (50 g) and stirred until the ice was completely dissolved. Later, the solution was neutralized with ammonium hydroxide. The precipitate that formed was filtered, dried, and crystallized from ethanol 6a, c, d, g–i or butanol 6b, e, f.

Method B (for compounds 6a, d)

20 mL of 10 % ethanolic solution of hydrochloric acid was added to thiosemicarbazide 4a, d and the reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 1 h. Subsequently, the solution was left at room temperature for 24 h. The precipitate formed was separated by filtration, dried, and crystallized from ethanol.

Method C (for compounds 6e, f)

A mixture of 10 mmol of thiosemicarbazide 4e, f in 10 mL of anhydrous acetic acid was refluxed for 1 h. Subsequently, the solution was left at room temperature for 12 h. The precipitate that formed was separated by filtration, dried, and crystallized from butanol.

5-Aminoethyl-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6a)

Yield: 81.3 %, mp: 168–170 °C (dec.). Analysis for C19H18N6S2 (394.52); calculated: C, 57.84; H, 4.60; N, 21.30; S, 16.25; found: C, 57.69; H, 4.58; N, 21.26; S, 16.21. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3244 (NH), 3071 (CH aromatic), 2944, 1458, 733 (CH aliphatic), 1602 (C=N), 1506 (C–N), 671 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.13 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.21–3.27 (q, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.57 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.17–7.70 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 9.35 (brs, 1H, NH).

5-Aminoallyl-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6b)

Yield: 68.9 %, mp: 208–210 °C (dec.). Analysis for C20H18N6S2 (406.53); calculated: C, 59.09; H, 4.46; N, 20.67; S, 15.77; found: C, 59.22; H, 4.45; N, 20.65; S, 15.73. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3256 (NH), 3083 (CH aromatic), 2955, 1489, 741 (CH aliphatic), 1610 (C=N), 1503 (C–N), 679 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.87 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.12 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.02–5.13 (dd, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, =CH2), 5.79–5.88 (m, 1H, CH), 7.40–8.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 10.13 (brs, 1H, NH).

5-Aminocyclohexyl-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6c)

Yield: 75.6 %, mp: 172–174 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H24N6S2 (448.61); calculated: C, 61.58; H, 5.39; N, 18.73; S, 14.30; found: C, 61.61; H, 5.37; N, 18.76; S, 14.27. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3190 (NH), 3093 (CH aromatic), 2972, 1467, 749 (CH aliphatic), 1620 (C=N), 681 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.1–1.65 (m, 10H, 5CH2 cyclohexane), 3.03 (m, 1H, CH cyclohexane), 4.22 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.33–8.06 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 10.16 (brs, 1H, NH).

5-Aminophenyl-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6d)

Yield: 50.9 %, mp: 192–198 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H18N6S2 (442.60); calculated: C, 62.42; H, 4.10; N, 19.00; S, 14.49; found: C, 62.36; H, 4.09; N, 18.97; S, 14.53. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3199 (NH), 3011 (CH aromatic), 2968 (CH aliphatic), 1610 (C=N), 1504 (C–N), 683 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.02 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.98–7.54 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 10.42 (brs, 1H, NH).

[5-Amino-(4-bromophenyl)]-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6e)

Yield: 89.4 %, mp: 203–205 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H17BrN6S2 (521.45); calculated: C, 52.98; H, 3.29; N, 16.12; S, 12.30; Br, 15.32; found: C, 52.73; H, 3.27; N, 16.15; S, 12.27. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3167 (NH), 3110 (CH aromatic), 2954, 1441 (CH aliphatic), 1602 (C=N), 680 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.22 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.89–7.65 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 10.23 (brs, 1H, NH).

[5-Amino-(4-chlorophenyl)]-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6f)

Yield: 94.7 %, mp: 215–218 °C (dec.). Analysis for C23H17ClN6S2 (477.00); calculated: C, 57.91; H, 3.59; N, 17.62; S, 13.44; Cl, 7.43; found: C, 57.71; H, 3.60; N, 17.58; S, 13.39. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3245 (NH), 3065 (CH aromatic), 2977 (CH aliphatic), 1611 (C=N), 1506 (C–N), 695 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.89 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.39–7.64 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 10.36 (brs, 1H, NH).

[5-Amino-(4-methoxyphenyl)]-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6g)

Yield: 53.6 %, mp: 152–154 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H20N6OS2 (472.58); calculated: C, 60.99; H, 4.26; N, 17.78; S, 13.57; found: C, 60.89; H, 4.26; N, 17.75; S, 14.55. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3211 (NH), 3038 (CH aromatic), 2982, 1451 (CH aliphatic), 1600 (C=N), 1502 (C–N), 692 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.71 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.65 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.89–7.78 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 10.07 (brs, 1H, NH).

5-Aminobenzyl-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6h)

Yield: 70.2 %, mp: 146–148 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H20N6S2 (456.58); calculated: C, 63.13; H, 4.41; N, 18.41; S, 14.04; found: C, 63.05; H, 4.39; N, 18.36; S, 14.09. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3272 (NH), 3042 (CH aromatic), 2934, 1458 (CH aliphatic), 1601 (C=N), 1512 (C–N), 686 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.11 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.73 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.34–7.62 (m, 15H, 15ArH), 10.47 (brs, 1H, NH).

[5-Amino-(4-methoxybenzyl)]-2-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazole (6i)

Yield: 71.4 %, mp: 218–220 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H22N6OS2 (486.61); calculated: C, 61.70; H, 4.56; N, 17.27; S, 13.18; found: C, 61.77; H, 4.55; N, 17.23; S, 13.22. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3268 (NH), 3095 (CH aromatic), 2955, 1420, 765 (CH aliphatic), 1598 (C=N), 1508 (C–N), 690 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 3.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.98 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.44 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.86–7.64 (m, 14H, 14ArH), 10.44 (brs, 1H, NH).

Derivatives of N,N-disubstituted acetamide (7a–i)

General method (for compounds 7a–i)

A mixture of 10 mmol of appropriate 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazole 6a–i in 5 mL of acetic anhydride was heated under reflux for 2 h. Distilled water was added to the reaction mixture and it was allowed to cool. The resulting precipitate was filtered and washed with distilled water. The residue was purified by recrystallization from ethanol.

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-ethylacetamide (7a)

Yield: 75.6 %, mp: 182–184 °C (dec.). Analysis for C21H20N6OS2 (436.55); calculated: C, 57.78; H, 4.62; N, 19.25; S, 14.69; found: C, 57.81; H, 4.61; N, 19.28; S, 14.69. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3091 (CH aromatic), 2922, 1467, 742 (CH aliphatic), 1701 (C=O), 1610 (C=N), 1512 (C–N), 692 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.15 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.65–3.70 (q, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.44 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.33–8.04 (m, 10H, 10ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-allylacetamide (7b)

Yield: 62.1 %, mp: 212–214 °C (dec.). Analysis for C22H20N6OS2 (448.56); calculated: C, 58.91; H, 4.49; N, 18.74; S, 14.30; found: C, 58.94; H, 4.51; N, 18.76; S, 14.28. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3122 (CH aromatic), 2978, 1492, 742 (CH aliphatic), 1708 (C=O), 1614 (C=N), 1515 (C–N), 688 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.11 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.27 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.35 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.14–5.18 (dd, J = 5 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 2H, =CH2), 5.81–5.86 (m, 1H, CH), 7.34–8.07 (m, 10H, 10ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-cyclohexylacetamide (7c)

Yield: 87.5 %, mp: 193–195 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H26N6OS2 (490.64); calculated: C, 61.20; H, 5.34; N, 17.13; S, 13.07; found: C, 61.22; H, 5.32; N, 17.16; S, 13.05. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3108 (CH aromatic), 2988, 1487, 755 (CH aliphatic), 1705 (C=O), 1603 (C=N), 1506 (C–N), 674 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.36–1.84 (m, 10H, 5CH2 cyclohexane), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.64 (m, 1H, CH cyclohexane), 4.26 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.33–8.05 (m, 10H, 10ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-phenylacetamide (7d)

Yield: 67.7 %, mp: 209–211 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H20N6OS2 (484.59); calculated: C, 61.96; H, 4.16; N, 17.34; S, 13.23; found: C, 61.95; H, 4.08; N, 17.31; S, 13.26. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3098 (CH aromatic), 2978 (CH aliphatic), 1699 (C=O), 1602 (C=N), 1509 (C–N), 694 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.12 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.22 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.16–7.92 (m, 15H, 15ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide (7e)

Yield: 84.6 %, mp: 222–224 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H19BrN6OS2 (563.49); calculated: C, 53.29; H, 3.40; N, 14.91; S, 11.38; Br, 14.18; found: C, 53.33; H, 3.38; N, 14.95; S, 11.36. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3123 (CH aromatic), 2974, 1467 (CH aliphatic), 1712 (C=O), 1621 (C=N), 1509 (C–N), 684 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.15 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.25 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.27–7.94 (m, 14H, 14ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-(4-chlorophenyl)acetamide (7f)

Yield: 59.8 %, mp: 229–231 °C (dec.). Analysis for C25H19ClN6OS2 (519.04); calculated: C, 57.85; H, 3.69; N, 16.19; S, 12.36; Cl, 6.83; found: C, 57.81; H, 3.65; N, 16.22; S, 12.37. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3090 (CH aromatic), 2980, 1451 (CH aliphatic), 1695 (C=O), 1601 (C=N), 1521 (C–N), 689 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.15 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.26–7.91 (m, 14H, 14ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide (7g)

Yield: 62.8 %, mp: 174–176 °C (dec.). Analysis for C26H22N6O2S2 (514.62); calculated: C, 60.68; H, 4.31; N, 16.33; S, 12.46; found: C, 60.64; H, 4.29; N, 16.37; S, 12.45. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3067 (CH aromatic), 2987, 1452 (CH aliphatic), 1710 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1508 (C–N), 679 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.09 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.78 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.09–8.50 (m, 14H, 14ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-benzylacetamide (7h)

Yield: 73.4 %, mp: 156–158 °C (dec.). Analysis for C26H22N6OS2 (498.62); calculated: C, 62.63; H, 4.45; N, 16.85; S, 12.86; found: C, 62.67; H, 4.48; N, 16.81; S, 12.84. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3076 (CH aromatic), 2965, 1468 (CH aliphatic), 1713 (C=O), 1614 (C=N), 1523 (C–N), 695 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.06 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.26 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.75 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.19–8.36 (m, 15H, 15ArH).

N-(5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)acetamide (7i)

Yield: 69.4 %, mp: 201–203 °C (dec.). Analysis for C27H24N6O2S2 (528.65); calculated: C, 61.34; H, 4.58; N, 15.90; S, 12.13; found: C, 61.37; H, 4.59; N, 15.89; S, 12.16. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3103 (CH aromatic), 2967, 1461, 756 (CH aliphatic), 1704 (C=O), 1607 (C=N), 1514 (C–N), 697 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 2.16 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.77 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.24 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.31 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.88–7.71 (m, 14H, 14ArH).

[(4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl] acetic acid (8)

Compound 8 was obtained using the same method as described earlier for derivatives 5a–i. That is, a mixture of thiosemicarbazide 4j (10 mmol) and 20 mL of 2 % aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was refluxed for 2 h. Then, the solution was neutralized with diluted hydrochloric acid and the formed precipitate was filtered and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 70.3 %, mp: 248–249 °C (dec.). Analysis for C16H13N3O2S (311.36); calculated: C, 61.72; H, 4.21; N, 13.49; S, 10.30; found: C, 61.59; H, 4.19; N, 13.54; S, 10.28. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3079 (CH aromatic), 3045 (OH), 2982 (CH aliphatic), 1702 (C=O), 1599 (C=N), 688 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.04 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.28–7.61 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 12.97 (s, 1H, OH).

4-Carboxymethyl-5-{[(4,5-diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (9)

Compound 9 was obtained using the same method as described earlier for derivatives 5a–i. That is, a mixture of thiosemicarbazide 4k (10 mmol) and 20 mL of 2 % aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was refluxed for 2 h. Then, the solution was neutralized with diluted hydrochloric acid and the formed precipitate was filtered and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 97.2 %, mp: 157–159 °C (dec.). Analysis for C19H16N6O2S2 (424.50); calculated: C, 53.76; H, 3.80; N, 19.80; S, 15.11; found: C, 53.88; H, 3.81; N, 19.74; S, 15.47. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3228 (NH), 3095 (OH), 3062 (CH aromatic), 2991 (CH aliphatic), 1713 (C=O), 1605 (C=N), 1504 (C–N), 1343 (C=S), 681 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.42 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.78 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.27–7.56 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 13.80 (s, 1H, OH), 14.13 (brs, 1H, NH).

5-{[(4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-2,5-dihydro-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3(2H)-thione (10)

Compound 10 was obtained using the same method as described earlier for derivatives 5a–i. That is, a mixture of thiosemicarbazide 4l (10 mmol) and 20 mL of 2 % aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was refluxed for 2 h. Then, the solution was neutralized with diluted hydrochloric acid and the formed precipitate was filtered and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 78.9 %, mp: 210–212 °C (dec.). Analysis for C17H14N6S2 (366.46); calculated: C, 55.72; H, 3.85; N, 22.93; S, 17.50; found: C, 55.58; H, 3.83; N, 23.01; S, 17.46. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3256 (NH), 3079 (CH aromatic), 2956, 1461 (CH aliphatic), 1603 (C=N), 1510 (C–N), 1329 (C=S), 695 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 4.04 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.29–7.92 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 13.33 (s, 1H, NH), 14.15 (brs, 1H, NH).

[3-{[(4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-1-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-5-thioxo-1,5-dihydro-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]acetic acid (11)

To a solution of 10 mmol of compound 9 in ethanol, pyrrolidine (10 mmol) and formaldehyde (0.2 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After that, distilled water was added and the precipitate that formed was filtered, washed with distilled water, and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 66.8 %, mp: 173–175 °C (dec.). Analysis for C24H25N7O2S2 (507.63); calculated: C, 56.78; H, 4.96; N, 19.31; S, 12.63; found: C, 56.80; H, 4.97; N, 19.34; S, 12.66. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3100 (OH), 3069 (CH aromatic), 2962 (CH aliphatic), 1715 (C=O), 1611 (C=N), 1514 (C–N), 1367 (C=S), 692 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.66–1.72 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.29 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.68 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.27 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.58 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.69 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.47–8.08 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 13.68 (s, 1H, OH).

5-{[(4,5-Diphenyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)sulfanyl]methyl}-2-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-2,4-dihyro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (12)

To a solution of 10 mmol of compound 10 in ethanol, pyrrolidine (10 mmol) and formaldehyde (0.2 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After that, distilled water was added and the precipitate that formed was filtered, washed with distilled water, and crystallized from ethanol.

Yield: 74.8 %, mp: 224–226 °C (dec.). Analysis for C22H23N7S2 (449.59); calculated: C, 58.77; H, 5.16; N, 21.81; S, 14.26; found: C, 58.79; H, 5.14; N, 21.83; S, 12.24. IR (KBr), ν (cm−1): 3290 (NH), 3098 (CH aromatic), 2978, 1482 (CH aliphatic), 1623 (C=N), 1522 (C–N), 1341 (C=S), 685 (C–S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6) δ (ppm): 1.67–1.73 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.32 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.77 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.05 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.68 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.36–8.35 (m, 10H, 10ArH), 14.68 (brs, 1H, NH).

Materials and methods

All synthesized compounds were preliminarily tested for their in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and -negative reference bacterial strains and next by the broth microdilution method against the selected bacterial strains.

Panel reference strains of aerobic bacteria from the American Type Culture Collection, including six Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. aureus ATCC 6538, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, B. subtilis ATCC 6633, B. cereus ATCC 10876, M. luteus ATCC 10240, and four Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 12453, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027, were used. Microbial suspensions with an optical density of 0.5 McFarland standard 150 × 106 CFU/mL (CFUs—colony forming units) were prepared in sterile 0.85 % NaCl. All stock solutions of the tested compounds were prepared in DMSO. The medium with DMSO at the final concentration and without the tested compounds served as the control—no microbial growth inhibition was observed.

Preliminary antimicrobial potency in vitro of the tested compounds was screened using the agar dilution method on the basis of the bacterial growth inhibition on the Mueller–Hinton agar containing the compounds at a concentration of 1,000 μg/mL. The plates were poured on the day of testing. 10 μL of each bacterial suspension was put onto the prepared solid media. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h (Bourgeois et al., 2007).

The antibacterial activity in vitro of the potentially active compounds was determined by the broth microdilution method on the basis of MIC, usually defined as the lowest concentration of the compound at which there was no visible growth of microorganisms (White et al., 2002). Determination of the MIC value was achieved by the broth microdilution method according to a CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) recommendation with some modifications (2008). The 96-well microplates were used; 198 μL of Mueller–Hinton broth with a series of twofold dilutions of the tested compound in the range of the final concentrations from 0.24 to 1,000 μg/mL was inoculated with 2 μL of microbial suspension (total volume per each well—200 μL). After incubation (at 35 °C for 18 h), spectrophotometric measurements of optical density (OD600) of the bacterial cultures with the tested compounds were performed in order to determine MIC. OD600 of bacterial cultures in the medium without the tested compounds was used as a control. The blank control wells with twofold dilution of each of the tested compounds added to the Mueller–Hinton broth without bacterial suspension were incubated under the same conditions. Cefuroxime, belonging to the second generation of cephalosporins, was used as a control antimicrobial agent.