Literature DB >> 23708926

Variations in corneal asphericity (Q value) between African-Americans and whites.

Daniel G Fuller1, Danielle Alperin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To search for differences in corneal asphericity on the basis of ethnicity between African-American and white populations.
METHODS: A prospective cohort design was used to analyze corneal asphericity (Q value) data obtained by Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) on right eyes from African-American (n = 80) and white (n = 80). Subjects were stratified by ethnicity, age, and spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error. Q values were obtained from each quadrant (superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal) and two meridians (horizontal and vertical).
RESULTS: The mean Q values were African-Americans -0.26 ± 0.19 and whites -0.20 ± 0.12, indicating that the eyes of African-Americans were significantly more prolate (p = 0.003) than those of whites. There was a significant difference between mean Q values for ethnic groups only in the 30- to 39-year olds (p = 0.01) and there was a lack of correlation with age in both ethnic groups. Q value contrasts by gender were only significant between males (p = 0.01). There was a lack of correlation between Q value and SE for either ethnic group. Age group contrasts between ethnic groups found significant differences for those with SE greater than 0.00 D to -3.00 D (p = 0.05) and greater than 0.00 D to +3.00 D (p = 0.05). Comparison of mean Q values in opposing meridians within and across ethnic groups were significant, although neither group showed significant differences between horizontal and vertical meridians.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal asphericity as represented by mean Q value varies significantly between African-Americans and whites. The greatest differences are evident in opposing quadrants and appear to be little influenced by age, gender, or SE.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708926     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318296befe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Authors:  Leonardo Torquetti; Carlos Arce; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Guilherme Ferrara; Paulo Ferrara; Brenno Signorelli; Armando Signorelli
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Predictive role of corneal Q-value differences between nasal-temporal and superior-inferior quadrants in orthokeratology lens decentration.

Authors:  Juan Li; Cheng Yang; Wenjuan Xie; Guanrong Zhang; Xue Li; Shujun Wang; Xiaohong Yang; Jin Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  The analysis of corneal asphericity (Q value) and its related factors of 1,683 Chinese eyes older than 30 years.

Authors:  Ying Xiong; Jing Li; Ningli Wang; Xue Liu; Zhao Wang; Frank F Tsai; Xiuhua Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Group Analysis of Q Values Calculated with Tangential Radius of Curvature from Human Anterior Corneal Surface.

Authors:  Zheren Xia; Chengmin Lin; Xueping Huang; Jinglu Ying; Mingguang Shi; Suilian Zheng
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  The normal distribution of corneal eccentricity and its determinants in two rural areas of north and south of Iran.

Authors:  Samira Heydarian; Hassan Hashemi; Fereshteh Shokrollahzadeh; Abbas Ali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Akbar Derakhshan; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-06

6.  Normative Values of Corneal Spherical Aberration, Pupil Size, and Other Key Refractive and Topographic Parameters in a Large Cohort of Egyptian Cataract Surgery Candidates.

Authors:  Rania Serag Elkitkat; Yousef A Fouad; Abdelrhman Shams; Ismail Hamza
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.