Literature DB >> 23708390

Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery.

Lin Chieh Wu1, Rahul Malhotra, John Carson Allen, Desiree Lie, Thiam Chye Tan, Truls Østbye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In Singapore, a developed Asian nation, a relatively high proportion of women undergo episiotomy. We assess risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy among women undergoing normal vaginal deliveries (NVDs) conducted by midwives and ascertain the association between episiotomy and degree of perineal tear.
METHODS: Participants included 77 midwives from a high-volume delivery unit in Singapore. The study had three sequential phases: (1) medical record review of women undergoing NVDs conducted by midwives over a 1-month period to document the proportion with episiotomy; (2) focus group discussions with midwives to form a checklist of reasons for episiotomy; (3) checklist-based documentation of midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy and data collection on maternal, neonatal, practice and midwife factors, and degree of perineal tear among women undergoing NVDs conducted by midwives over a 2-month period. Risk factors for episiotomy were assessed through logistic regression.
RESULTS: Primiparity, advanced maternal age, Indian ethnicity, higher birth weight and older midwife age were associated with episiotomy. The most common midwife-reported reason for episiotomy among primiparous women was primiparity (55.1%), and among multiparous women was fetal distress (20.0%) and poor maternal effort (20.0%). All women with episiotomy sustained at least a second-degree perineal tear versus 27.1% among women without episiotomy.
CONCLUSION: Most midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy were not congruent with international practice guidelines. Women without episiotomy have lesser tears than those with episiotomy. Practice protocols and educational programs are needed to change episiotomy practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708390     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  9 in total

1.  Midwives' Clinical Reasons for Performing Episiotomies in the Kurdistan Region: Are they evidence-based?

Authors:  Hamdia M Ahmed
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-07-24

2.  Cross-sectional study comparing public and private hospitals in Catalonia: is the practice of routine episiotomy changing?

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; María J Pueyo; Mercedes Perez-Botella; Xavi Espada; Isabel Salgado; Analía Gómez; Herminia Biescas; Isabel Espiga; Joanna White; Rosa Fernandez; Josep Fusté; Vicente Ortún
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations with adverse outcomes, birthplace and care provider: A nationwide explorative study.

Authors:  Anna E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Dirkje C Zondag; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze; Thomas van den Akker; Corine J Verhoeven; Caroline C Geerts; François G Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of Maternal Age on Selected Obstetric Parameters.

Authors:  Barbara Schildberger; Doris Linzner; Luise Hehenberger; Hermann Leitner; Christian Pfeifer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Suzanne Thompson; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Marrit Smit; Marianne Prins; Thomas van den Akker; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Beshada Zerfu Woldegeorgis; Mohammed Suleiman Obsa; Lemi Belay Tolu; Efa Ambaw Bogino; Tesfalem Israel Boda; Henok Berhanu Alemu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-24

7.  Episiotomy for Medical Indications during Vaginal Birth-Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors Determining the Performance of This Procedure.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Dorota Sys; Patryk Rzońca; Justyna Teliga-Czajkowska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Episiotomy and its relationship to various clinical variables that influence its performance.

Authors:  Carmen Ballesteros-Meseguer; César Carrillo-García; Mariano Meseguer-de-Pedro; Manuel Canteras-Jordana; M Emilia Martínez-Roche
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries.

Authors:  Christophe Clesse; Jonathan Cottenet; Joelle Lighezzolo-Alnot; Karine Goueslard; Michele Scheffler; Paul Sagot; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.