Literature DB >> 23708140

Exome sequencing to identify de novo mutations in sporadic ALS trios.

Alessandra Chesi1, Brett T Staahl, Ana Jovičić, Julien Couthouis, Maria Fasolino, Alya R Raphael, Tomohiro Yamazaki, Laura Elias, Meraida Polak, Crystal Kelly, Kelly L Williams, Jennifer A Fifita, Nicholas J Maragakis, Garth A Nicholson, Oliver D King, Robin Reed, Gerald R Crabtree, Ian P Blair, Jonathan D Glass, Aaron D Gitler.   

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease whose causes are still poorly understood. To identify additional genetic risk factors, we assessed the role of de novo mutations in ALS by sequencing the exomes of 47 ALS patients and both of their unaffected parents (n = 141 exomes). We found that amino acid-altering de novo mutations were enriched in genes encoding chromatin regulators, including the neuronal chromatin remodeling complex (nBAF) component SS18L1 (also known as CREST). CREST mutations inhibited activity-dependent neurite outgrowth in primary neurons, and CREST associated with the ALS protein FUS. These findings expand our understanding of the ALS genetic landscape and provide a resource for future studies into the pathogenic mechanisms contributing to sporadic ALS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708140      PMCID: PMC3709464          DOI: 10.1038/nn.3412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is a fatal adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by loss of motor neurons [1]. Although ~10% of cases have a family history of ALS (FALS), the majority of cases are sporadic (SALS). There have been several recent advances in defining the genetic landscape of FALS. These include discoveries of mutations in TARDBP, FUS, VCP, OPTN, UBQLN2, C9orf72, and PFN1 as new FALS disease genes [2-8]. Together with mutations in SOD1 [9], the causes of two thirds of FALS cases have now been elucidated. There have also been significant inroads into understanding SALS etiology and now genetic contributors for ~11% of SALS cases are known. Since it is likely that genetics plays a central role in this form of the disease, there is intense interest in defining additional genetic causes and risk factors for SALS. A possible genetic mechanism for sporadic disease is de novo mutation – a mutation that arises spontaneously in the germline of one of the unaffected parents. Indeed, de novo mutations have recently been identified as contributors to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, and mental retardation [10-16]. There have been confirmed de novo mutations in known ALS genes in apparently sporadic ALS cases [17-19], indicating that, in principle, this mechanism could also contribute to ALS.

Results

To test the hypothesis that de novo mutations contribute to risk for ALS, we performed a systematic analysis of ALS trios (ALS patient and both unaffected parents, Fig. 1a). Because ALS is a late onset disease, trios for which DNA samples are available for patients and their parents are much rarer than for early onset ones like autism. Nevertheless, we were able to assemble a collection of 47 ALS trios and we performed whole exome sequencing on all 141 individuals (47 × 3 = 141 exomes). We pre-screened all 47 ALS cases for the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion [20, 21] and they were all negative. See Supplementary Table S1 for clinical and demographic information.
Figure 1

The SS18L1/CREST de novo mutation (Q388stop) identified in an ALS trio inhibits activity-dependent dendritic outgrowth. a) We sequenced the exomes of 47 ALS patients and both unaffected parents (n = 141 exomes) to identify de novo mutations. b) We identified a de novo mutation in the neuronal chromatin remodeling complex subunit SS18L1/CREST, which introduces a premature termination codon, deleting the CBP-binding motif contained within the last nine amino acids. h=human; m=mouse. c) SS18L1/CREST is expressed in motor neurons of the adult spinal cord and localizes to the nucleus (arrow). Scale bar 10 μm. d) Functional validation of the CREST de novo mutation in primary neurons. Primary cortical neurons were isolated from E18.5 mouse embryos, transfected with Vector-IRES-GFP, CREST-IRES-GFP or CREST AA 1–393-IRES-GFP (The 1–393 truncation of mouse CREST corresponds to 1–388 of human CREST, which we identified in the ALS trio as Q388stop). Neurons were cultured for 5 days and stimulated overnight with 30mM KCl where indicated. Control vector and CREST overexpression do not affect dendrite outgrowth in response to KCl depolarization. CREST AA 1–393 significantly reduces total dendrite length in response to KCl depolarization. An example of the dendrite outline tracing used to quantify dendritic length and number of branch points is shown. Scale bar 10 μm. e) The average values are from three independent experiments, each with three coverslips per condition with 15–20 GFP+ neurons scored per coverslip. f) # branch points per cell is affected in a similar fashion as total dendrite length. Error bars, S.E. *P<0.02, **P<0.002, ***P<0.0005, Student’s t-test.

We achieved an average coverage of 56X across all samples, and on average 87% of the target bases in each individual were covered by at least 10 independent sequence reads (Supplementary Table S2). Following validation by Sanger sequencing we identified 25 novel de novo amino acid-altering variants (non-synonymous, NS): 20 missense, 1 nonsense, 1 splicing, 2 frameshift and 1 in-frame deletion. The observed de novo mutation rate is consistent with those reported in recent studies of autism spectrum disorders ([10-13] and see Supplementary Table S3). The frequency distribution of de novo NS mutations closely followed a Poisson distribution, indicating that multiple de novo events within a single individual do not contribute to ALS risk (Supplementary Fig. S1). Table 1 shows the list of 25 novel de novo NS mutations identified in the 47 ALS trios. We first asked if there are any functional categories or cellular pathways enriched in this list. Functional annotation analysis performed with DAVID (v6.7) [22] revealed a significant enrichment of genes encoding chromatin regulators (5 out of 25: EHMT1, FOXA1, HDAC10, SRCAP, and SS18L1 (see below and Staahl et al submitted); P=1×10−2; corrected for the multiple pathways that were tested). Are de novo mutations simply more common in chromatin regulator genes or is this enrichment in our ALS list meaningful? To address this question, we sought a “control” set of trios. The recent analysis of de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders included some exome data on unaffected siblings [10]. We used the de novo mutations found in unaffected siblings (n=50) to perform the same functional analysis. This list of de novo mutations was not enriched for any functional category (Supplemental Fig. S2), supporting the idea that chromatin regulator genes and defects in chromatin regulation could contribute to ALS. Indeed, drugs modulating histone acetylation have shown protective effects in ALS mouse models and patient iPSC-derived motor neurons [23-25] and have undergone phase 2 clinical studies in ALS subjects [26]. Our results now reveal potential genetic connections to ALS as well.
Table 1

List of novel amino acid-altering de novo variants identified in 47 ALS trios.

Trio #Genomic coordinates (hg19)Nucleotide changeGeneDescriptionAmino acid change
19chr1:26672011C/AAIM1Labsent in melanoma 1-like proteinp.Gly380Trp
44chr3:138219345T/GCEP70centrosomal protein 70kDap.Asp478Ala
3chr11:62677899A/GCHRM1cholinergic receptor, muscarinicp.Leu225Pro
37chr16:58555162A/GCNOT1CCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 1p.Phe2326Ser
12chr6:70672763G/CCOL19A1collagen, type XIX, alpha 1splicing
33chr5:122909210A/-CSNK1G3casein kinaseFrameshift indel
37chr9:140611221G/AEHMT1euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferasep.Ala77Thr
23chr19:18561734G/AELLelongation factor RNA polymerase IIp.Arg340Trp
18chr14:38061661GCTCAGCGCCGTACCCATGGCCGTCAC/-FOXA1transcriptional activator of the forkhead class of DNA-binding proteinsNon-frameshift indel
20chr7:4800826G/AFOXK1transcriptional activator of the forkhead class of DNA-binding proteinsp.Val610Met
33chr14:105518381C/GGPR132G protein-coupled receptorp.Lys31Asn
23chr22:50688552C/THDAC10histone deacetylasep.Gly110Glu
23chr16:22826121C/AHS3ST2heparan sulfate (glucosamine) 3-O-sulfotransferasep.Gln64Lys
50chr6:17850560C/GKIF13Akinesin family memberp.Gln237His
3chr11:132016267C/TNTM(Ig) domain-containing GPI-anchored cell adhesion moleculep.Arg87Cys
48chr15:65157668C/GPLEKHO2pleckstrin homology domain containing proteinp.Pro302Ala
44chr8:10466776C/TRP1L1retinitis pigmentosa 1-like 1p.Arg1611Gln
35chr16:30740326G/-SRCAPATPase component of the chromatin-remodeling SRCAP complexFrameshift indel
43chr20:60749698C/TSS18L1synovial sarcoma translocation gene on chromosome 18-like 1, component of neuron-specific nBAF chromatin remodeling complexp.Gln388Stop
41chr13:33703370G/TSTARD13StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing proteinp.Leu364Ile
8chr17:30202275G/CUTP6small subunit (SSU) processome componentp.Ala428Gly
29chr10:75865064C/TVCLcytoskeletal protein associated with cell-cell and cell-matrix junctionsp.Pro796Leu
26chr4:10117848G/CWDR1WD repeat-containing proteinp.Phe9Leu
1chr14:74371655A/GZNF410zinc finger proteinp.Tyr278Cys
43chr16:89294680G/AZNF778zinc finger proteinp.Glu662Lys
Three genes on the list have been implicated in neurite outgrowth (NTM, VCL, SS18L1) [27-31]. Defects in neurite outgrowth have been seen in zebrafish models of ALS [32] and in iPSC-derived motor neurons from ALS patients [25]. One of these genes, SS18L1 (also called CREST), is expressed only in post mitotic neurons and we have found encodes an essential subunit of a neuron-specific chromatin-remodeling complex (nBAF) (Staahl et al in press) that resembles yeast SWI/SNF and SWR and is also called mSWI/SNF [33]. nBAF controls activity-induced dendrite outgrowth [29, 31] and is strongly expressed in the brain and spinal cord, where it localizes to the nucleus (Fig. 1c). CREST is a calcium-regulated transcriptional activator, a property that requires the last 9 amino acids of CREST, which is reported to interact with the histone acetylase CBP (Fig. 1b and [29]). Remarkably, we identified a de novo mutation in SS18L1/CREST that introduces a stop codon removing the exact same last nine amino acids (p.Q388stop, Table 1 and Fig. 1b). To determine the functional significance of this mutation in neurons, we tested its effects in primary cortical neurons isolated from mouse embryos. Depolarizing these primary neuronal cultures with KCl induced dramatic dendrite outgrowth (Fig. 1d), increasing the total dendrite length (Fig. 1e) and number of dendritic branch points per neuron (Fig. 1f). We transfected these neurons with GFP, WT CREST or a mutant CREST lacking the last 9 amino acids (CREST1–393; this truncation in the mouse CREST homolog corresponds to CREST1–388 in human CREST, Fig. 1b). Expression of GFP or WT CREST had no effect on KCl-induced dendrite outgrowth (Fig. 1 d–f), whereas the presence of mutant CREST profoundly inhibited dendrite outgrowth (Fig. 1 d,e) and markedly decreased complexity of the dendritic arbors (Fig. 1f). These functional studies in primary neurons indicate that this mutation is likely deleterious and its dominant negative properties are consistent with a heterozygous mutation being able to cause disease. To further examine a genetic role for SS18L1 in ALS, we analyzed exome sequence data from index cases of 62 ALS families that were negative for all known ALS genes including C9orf72. In one case (individual III:2, family ALS296, Fig. 2a), we identified a novel missense mutation (p.I123M) that was absent from public SNP and exome databases. We also performed targeted SNP genotyping on 693 control individuals from the same population and this variant was absent. Re-sequencing in this family showed the p.I123M variant was absent from the unaffected parent of this index case, implying segregation of the mutation from the affected (deceased) parent (Fig. 2a). To test the functional significance of this variant and to extend our studies to a cell type more clinically relevant to ALS, we tested its effects in cultures of primary motor neurons isolated from mouse embryos. We transfected motor neurons with GFP, WT CREST or the two mutants (CREST1–393 or CRESTI123M). Strikingly, compared to GFP or WT CREST, expression of the mutants CREST1–393 or CRESTI123M significantly blocked depolarization-induced dendrite outgrowth (Fig. 2b) and the increase in dendritic arbor complexity (Fig. 2c). Thus, these functional experiments in primary motor neurons provide evidence to support the pathogenicity of the two CREST variants identified in ALS patients.
Figure 2

Identification of an additional SS18L1/CREST variant in FALS case and interaction with FUS. a) Novel SS18L1 missense variant in familial ALS. Genotypes of available DNA samples for the indicated SS18L1 variant are shown (‘wt’ denotes wild type, ‘I123M’ denotes mutant). The variant c.T369G (p.I123M) was identified in affected individual III:2 (the index case) and was absent in unaffected individuals II:3 and III:1. The genotype of sample II:2 (*) was inferred from the genotypes of spouse and progeny. The question mark (?) for individual I:2 indicates that no historical clinical notes were available. b) Motor neurons transfected with GFP or WT CREST respond to KCl stimulation by increasing the total dendritic length. Transfection of CREST1–393 or CRESTI123M inhibits stimulation-induced dendrite outgrowth. The average values are from two independent experiments, each with four coverslips per condition with 30–35 GFP+ neurons scored per coverslip. c) # of branch points in motor neurons is affected in a similar fashion as total dendrite length. Error bars, S.E. *P<0.02, **P<0.002, ***P<0.0005, Student’s t-test. d,e) FUS and SS18L1/CREST can physically associate in mouse cortical neurons. d) As a positive control, nBAF complex core subunit Brg, was co-immunoprecipitated by SS18L1/CREST. The SS18L1/CREST antibody also co-immunoprecipitated FUS. e) Antibodies against several other nBAF subunits co-immunoprecipitate FUS. * FUS band is visible.

The defects in dendritic morphology elicited by the two SS18L1/CREST mutant proteins in our primary neuron experiments are strikingly reminiscent of dendrite patterning defects observed in neurons cultured from FUS-deficient mice [34]. We therefore considered the possibility that FUS and SS18L1 might physically associate. We (GRC and LE) conducted mass spectrometry studies of nBAF complexes affinity purified at low stringency (150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 50mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.0) from P1 cortical neurons for proteins that interact with nBAF in cortical neurons. We detected 81 peptides from FUS representing 29.6 % coverage in these mass spectrometry studies. To further explore the potential physical interaction of FUS and CREST, we performed immunoprecipitation assays from nuclear extracts isolated from P1 mouse cortical neurons. Immunoprecipitating endogenous CREST from these extracts followed by immunoblotting with a FUS antibody demonstrated that CREST and FUS interact in neurons (Fig. 2d). We noted the interaction between CREST and FUS, when using the reciprocal immunoprecipitation (FUS antibody for IP, SS18L1/CREST antibody for immunoblot), was nearly undetectable. This could be indicative of different relative abundances. FUS might be more abundant than CREST and therefore we detect the interaction only one way. Another possibility is that the FUS antibody masks the binding site of CREST on FUS. To address this we performed quantitative western blots to determine the amounts of FUS and Brg (the core ATPase was used as a representative of the nBAF complexes of which CREST is a core subunit) per cell. We estimate there to be 3×105 molecules of BRG and 1.2×106 molecules of FUS per cell (data not shown). Therefore, FUS is at least 4-fold more abundant, and not a core BAF complex component, but perhaps transiently associates with CREST perhaps in a regulatory role. Because CREST is a dedicated subunit of the nBAF complex in neurons we wondered if using antibodies against other nBAF subunits would immunoprecipitate FUS. Indeed, we find many of the BAF subunits co-immunoprecipitate FUS (Figure 2e). Interestingly, Polybromo, which is a PBAF complex subunit and does not contain CREST, co-immunoprecipitated FUS. Therefore, FUS must be binding to a surface on the BAF complex other than CREST. This surface might be on Brg or BAF57 as these IPs co-immunoprecipated FUS the weakest and therefore the antibodies to these subunits could be blocking the nBAF-FUS interaction. Together, these experiments provide evidence that CREST and the nBAF chromatin remodelling complex can associate with FUS in neurons. Intriguingly, bioinformatics analysis revealed the presence of predicted prion-like domains in SS18L1 and SS18 (Fig. S3). These domains are present in an expanding class of neurodegenerative disease proteins, including TDP-43, FUS, TAF15, EWSR1, hnRNPA2B1, and hnRNPA1, and are able to drive aggregation of these proteins [35-40]. In the future, it will be important to define how SS18L1’s prion-like domain contributes to its normal function and if it facilitates co-aggregation with FUS or other aggregation-prone RNA-binding proteins in disease. Together, these data support a potential role of the identified SS18L1/CREST variants in ALS and implicate additional nBAF complex components as candidates for further investigation in the disease.

Discussion

We have sequenced the exomes of 47 ALS trios. These results provide a systematic analysis of de novo mutations in ALS and reveal genes encoding chromatin regulators as new candidates for ALS genetic contributors. Notably, in addition to SS18L1, we identified a de novo truncating mutation in SRCAP in another ALS trio (Table 1). Like SS18L1/CREST, SRCAP is also a CBP-interacting transcriptional co-activator [41], further underscoring a potential role of CBP-associated chromatin regulators in ALS. Indeed, FUS itself is a key transcriptional regulator via interactions with CBP [42]. Mutations in 8 of 15 subunits of BAF complexes have been identified as causative in Coffin-Siris, a rare congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by growth deficiency, intellectual disability, microcephaly, coarse facial features and hypoplastic nail of the fifth finger and/or toe [43, 44], and Nicolaides-Baraitser Syndromes, which includes features of intellectual disability with marked language impairment, microcephaly, epilepsy and morphological defects [45, 46] and have also been found in sporadic autism [10] and intellectual disability [47] as well as schizophrenia [48]. It is tempting to speculate about possible pathophysiological connections between neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders [49]. Beyond the chromatin regulator genes, the identification of a de novo mutation in the type XIX collagen gene COL19A1 is intriguing because the expression of this molecule has been recently shown to be markedly upregulated in the muscle at end-stage of disease in a mouse model of inherited ALS (SOD1G39A) and Col19a1 expression negatively correlates with survival [50]. Future studies will be required to define the effect of this variant on COL19A1 expression and the effect it has on muscle function during disease progression. Additional functional studies in cell culture and animal models as well as re-sequencing these genes in larger ALS patient populations will be needed to assess the pathogenicity of the genes identified in this study. We propose that the specific genes we identify here, as well as their network of interacting partners (genetic and physical interactions), especially the other components of the SS18L1/CREST-containing nBAF chromatin remodeling complex are now candidates for evaluation in larger ALS patient cohorts. Using the autism exome sequencing efforts as a guide [10-13], we anticipate that increasing the number of ALS trios analyzed, integrating data from multiple studies, and focusing on key nodes in protein interaction networks will help strengthen and focus disease gene discovery efforts. Finally, this approach could be applied broadly to other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease.

Online Methods

ALS trios

Details of the ALS patients used in this study are compiled in Table S1. Genomic DNA from human ALS patients and both of their unaffected parents was collected at Emory University School of Medicine (IRB# IRB-133-98) and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. ALS samples were verified to meet El Escorial criteria for definite or probable ALS.

Exome capture, alignments and base-calling

Exomes for the 47 trios were captured with Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon 50Mb. Libraries were indexed, pooled and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq2000 machines (paired-end, 100-bp reads, 5 or 6 libraries per lane). Reads were mapped to a custom GRCh37/hg19 build using BWA 0.5.9 [51]. Picard-tools 1.55 was used to flag duplicate reads (http://picard.sourceforge.net/). GATK (v1.3-2-gcdd40d1) [52] IndelRealigner was used to realign reads around insertion/deletion (indel) sites. Read qualities were recalibrated using GATK Table Recalibration. Genotypes were generated simultaneously for all samples with GATK Unified Genotyper. Variant quality score recalibration was performed on SNPs calls (using HapMap v3.3 and the Omni chip array from the 1000 Genomes Project as training data) and calls were filtered at 99.0 truth sensitivity level [53]. Raw indel calls were filtered using FILTER= “QD < 2.0 || ReadPosRankSum < −20.0 || InbreedingCoeff < −0.8 || FS > 200.0”. Predicted de novo events were identified as sites where both parents were homozygous for the reference sequence and the offspring was heterozygous. Paternity and maternity was verified by checking the percentage of shared heterozygous mutations between child and mother or father in each trio (~50%). To identify rare private variants (novel), the full variant list was compared against dbSNPv135, the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP 5400) and the 1000 Genomes Project (Feb 2012). Annotation was performed using ANNOVAR (http://www.openbioinformatics.org/annovar).

Sanger sequencing validation of variants

All amino acid-altering de novo novel events were validated by designing primers with Primer3 (v.2.3.0) followed by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of father, mother and proband DNA samples.

Functional enrichment analysis

Functional enrichment analysis was performed with the Functional Annotation Chart tool of DAVID v. 6.7 [54] using the human genome as background. P-values were calculated using a modified Fisher Exact Test [55] and corrected using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Sequence analysis of Familial ALS cases

Index cases from 62 ALS families were recruited through neurogenetic clinics at Concord Hospital, Sydney, as well as at the Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Concord Hospital, a referral centre for ALS DNA diagnostic testing. Most families were of European descent. DNA samples from 693 control individuals were obtained from the Australian MND DNA Bank. Patients and family members provided informed written consent regulated by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sydney South West Area Health Service. All families had previously been screened for mutations in known ALS genes including C9ORF72, TARDBP, SOD1, FUS, PFN1, OPTN, VCP, UBQLN2, ANG, FIG4, DCTN1, and CHMP2B. Exomes for familial cases were captured with Illumina TruSeq Exome Enrichment kit. Libraries were indexed, pooled and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq2000 instruments (paired-end, 100-bp reads, 6 libraries per lane). Reads were mapped to the human genome (hg19, Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37) using BWA.

Clinical and demographic data

Family ALS296 was of UK ancestry. The index case (individual III:2, Fig. 2a) was diagnosed with bulbar onset ALS at 35 years, disease duration of 1 year. The father of this index case (individual II:2, Fig. 2a) was diagnosed with bulbar onset ALS at 48 years, disease duration of 1 year. Individual II:1 (Fig. 2a) was diagnosed with limb onset ALS and died at 61 years.

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human spinal cord sections, obtained from the University of Pennsylvania Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research Brain Bank, were rehydrated and subjected to Antigen Retrieval with Citrate Buffer pH 6.0 (Vector Labs). After washing with 0.1% PBS-Tween blocking was performed with 2% BSA, 5% NGS, 0.1% PBS-T for 60 minutes at 25°C. Sections were incubated with Rabbit anti-CREST (1:50; Proteintech) in 0.1% PBST overnight at 4°C. After washing with 0.1% PBST, sections were incubated with Goat anti-Rabbit-568 IgG (1:500; Invitrogen) for 2 hour at 25°C. Sections were then incubated DAPI, washed with PBS and mounted with 4% n-Propyl gallate (Sigma) in 90% glycerol, 10% phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

Mouse primary neuron culture and transfection

All mouse experiments were performed in compliance with institutional guidelines and regulations. E18.5 cortical neurons were isolated using the MACSTM neuron isolation kit. Motor neurons were isolated from E12.5 mouse spinal cord using Papain Dissociation System (Worthington). Dissociated cells were transfected with GFP or other constructs using Nucleofector (Amaxa shuttle) before plating on poly-L-ornithine, Laminin and fibronectin coated coverslips. Cortical neuron culture media contained DMEM/F12 with putrescine, 2-mercaptoethanol, transferrin, insulin, selenium, progesterone, MEM vitamin additive and 5% FBS. Motor neuron culture media contained Neurobasal supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), 2% horse serum, L-glutamine (0.5 mM), L-glutamate (25 μM), BDNF (1 ng/ml), GDNF (100 pg/ml) and CNTF (10 ng/ml).

Dendrite outgrowth assay

CREST, CREST1–393, or CRESTI123M were cloned into the pCIG-IRES-eGFP plasmid. 50ng of the respective plasmids mixed with 450ng pCIG-IRES-eGFP plasmid was transfected into 250,000 dissociated E18.5 mouse cortical neurons or E12.5 mouse motor neurons using Nucleofector (AMAXA shuttle) and plated onto coated coverslips. The neural cultures were grown for 6 days, +/− 30mM KCl for the last day. To define dendrite structure, cultures were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with anti-GFP (Molecular Probes) and anti-MAP2 (Sigma) and Alexa-Flour-488, -568 (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies (1:1000) and DAPI and mounted as described above. Pictures of GFP+/MAP2+ neurons were taken with a Leica DM5000 fluorescent microscope. Dendrite analysis was done with ImageJ and NeuronJ software.

Co-immunoprecipitation

For co-IPs, antibodies against FUS (A300-293A), BAF250B (A301-046A), Polybromo (A301-590A), BAF57 (A300-810A), BAF170 (A301-039A) all from Bethyl, CREST (H-80) from Proteintech, Brg (G7 or H88), BAF250A (H90x) all from Santa Cruz, BAF60c and BAF45c, BAF155-3 from the Crabtree lab were used. Rabbit or mouse IgG antibodies from Santa Cruz were used as a control. P1 mouse cortices were isolated using standard procedures. Nuclear extracts were prepared and incubated with respective antibodies and Protein A or G dynabeads overnight and washed 6 times in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100 as described in [56]. Western blots were probed with antibodies to Fus (ab23439) from Abcam, Brg (G7) and CREST (M15) from Santa Cruz. LiCor secondary antibodies were used for detection.

Statistical Analysis

For the functional enrichment analysis in ALS and control trios we used the Functional Annotation Chart tool of DAVID v. 6.7 [54] with the human genome as background. P-values were calculated using a modified Fisher Exact Test [55] and corrected using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For the primary neuronal culture assays we used the unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test. The number of biologically independent experiments and P-values are indicated in the figure legends. The sample sizes were chosen according to standard practice in the field. Supplementary Figure 1. Frequency distribution of non-synonymous de novo novel events in probands Supplementary Figure 2. Functional enrichment analysis of genes with de novo mutations in 47 ALS trios and 50 control trios (from O’Roak et al. (Nature. 2012. 485, 246–250) Supplementary Figure 3. Predicted prion-like regions in SS18L1/CREST and SS18 Supplementary Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of ALS patients Supplementary Table 2. Mapping and coverage overview of exome sequencing data in all ALS trio samples (n=141) Supplementary Table 3. Comparison of rates of de novo amino acid-altering events (non-synonymous, NS) in this study (ALS) and those reported in 4 recently published studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
  53 in total

1.  Heterozygous missense mutations in SMARCA2 cause Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome.

Authors:  Jeroen K J Van Houdt; Beata Anna Nowakowska; Sérgio B Sousa; Barbera D C van Schaik; Eve Seuntjens; Nelson Avonce; Alejandro Sifrim; Omar A Abdul-Rahman; Marie-José H van den Boogaard; Armand Bottani; Marco Castori; Valérie Cormier-Daire; Matthew A Deardorff; Isabel Filges; Alan Fryer; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Simone Gana; Livia Garavelli; Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach; Bryan D Hall; Denise Horn; Danny Huylebroeck; Jakub Klapecki; Malgorzata Krajewska-Walasek; Alma Kuechler; Matthew A Lines; Saskia Maas; Kay D Macdermot; Shane McKee; Alex Magee; Stella A de Man; Yves Moreau; Fanny Morice-Picard; Ewa Obersztyn; Jacek Pilch; Elizabeth Rosser; Nora Shannon; Irene Stolte-Dijkstra; Patrick Van Dijck; Catheline Vilain; Annick Vogels; Emma Wakeling; Dagmar Wieczorek; Louise Wilson; Orsetta Zuffardi; Antoine H C van Kampen; Koenraad Devriendt; Raoul Hennekam; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Clinical genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what do we really know?

Authors:  Peter M Andersen; Ammar Al-Chalabi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Evaluating the role of the FUS/TLS-related gene EWSR1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Julien Couthouis; Michael P Hart; Renske Erion; Oliver D King; Zamia Diaz; Tadashi Nakaya; Fadia Ibrahim; Hyung-Jun Kim; Jelena Mojsilovic-Petrovic; Saarene Panossian; Cecilia E Kim; Edward C Frackelton; Jennifer A Solski; Kelly L Williams; Dana Clay-Falcone; Lauren Elman; Leo McCluskey; Robert Greene; Hakon Hakonarson; Robert G Kalb; Virginia M Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Garth A Nicholson; Ian P Blair; Nancy M Bonini; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Zissimos Mourelatos; James Shorter; Aaron D Gitler
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in ALS and FTLD-U.

Authors:  Aaron D Gitler; James Shorter
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Essential role of type I(alpha) phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase in neurite remodeling.

Authors:  Francis P G van Horck; Emmanuelle Lavazais; Britta J Eickholt; Wouter H Moolenaar; Nullin Divecha
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE.

Authors:  Douglas A Hosack; Glynn Dennis; Brad T Sherman; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Gain and loss of function of ALS-related mutations of TARDBP (TDP-43) cause motor deficits in vivo.

Authors:  Edor Kabashi; Li Lin; Miranda L Tradewell; Patrick A Dion; Valérie Bercier; Patrick Bourgouin; Daniel Rochefort; Samar Bel Hadj; Heather D Durham; Christine Vande Velde; Guy A Rouleau; Pierre Drapeau
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Neurotrimin mediates bifunctional effects on neurite outgrowth via homophilic and heterophilic interactions.

Authors:  O D Gil; G Zanazzi; A F Struyk; J L Salzer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Exome sequencing supports a de novo mutational paradigm for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bin Xu; J Louw Roos; Phillip Dexheimer; Braden Boone; Brooks Plummer; Shawn Levy; Joseph A Gogos; Maria Karayiorgou
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia.

Authors:  Han-Xiang Deng; Wenjie Chen; Seong-Tshool Hong; Kym M Boycott; George H Gorrie; Nailah Siddique; Yi Yang; Faisal Fecto; Yong Shi; Hong Zhai; Hujun Jiang; Makito Hirano; Evadnie Rampersaud; Gerard H Jansen; Sandra Donkervoort; Eileen H Bigio; Benjamin R Brooks; Kaouther Ajroud; Robert L Sufit; Jonathan L Haines; Enrico Mugnaini; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Teepu Siddique
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Kevin Boylan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Emerging mechanisms of molecular pathology in ALS.

Authors:  Owen M Peters; Mehdi Ghasemi; Robert H Brown
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Mechanisms regulating dendritic arbor patterning.

Authors:  Fernanda Ledda; Gustavo Paratcha
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Deficiency of the chromatin regulator BRPF1 causes abnormal brain development.

Authors:  Linya You; Jinfeng Zou; Hong Zhao; Nicholas R Bertos; Morag Park; Edwin Wang; Xiang-Jiao Yang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Genetics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghasemi; Robert H Brown
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Genome-wide analysis of the heritability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Margaux F Keller; Luigi Ferrucci; Andrew B Singleton; Pentti J Tienari; Hannu Laaksovirta; Gabriella Restagno; Adriano Chiò; Bryan J Traynor; Michael A Nalls
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 7.  Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of neurogenetic diseases.

Authors:  Irfan A Qureshi; Mark F Mehler
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 8.  Genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: new genetic analysis methodologies entailing new opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marangi; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  De novo nonsense mutation of the FUS gene in an apparently familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis case.

Authors:  Andrea Calvo; Cristina Moglia; Antonio Canosa; Maura Brunetti; Marco Barberis; Bryan J Traynor; Giovanna Carrara; Consuelo Valentini; Gabriella Restagno; Adriano Chiò
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 10.  State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics.

Authors:  Alan E Renton; Adriano Chiò; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.