Literature DB >> 23707680

Specifying the nonspecific components of acupuncture analgesia.

Lene Vase1, Sara Baram, Nobuari Takakura, Hiroyoshi Yajima, Miho Takayama, Ted J Kaptchuk, Søren Schou, Troels Staehelin Jensen, Robert Zachariae, Peter Svensson.   

Abstract

It is well known that acupuncture has pain-relieving effects, but the contribution of specific and especially nonspecific factors to acupuncture analgesia is less clear. One hundred one patients who developed pain of ≥ 3 on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 to 10) after third molar surgery were randomized to receive active acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, or no treatment for 30 min with acupuncture needles with potential for double-blinding. Patients' perception of the treatment (active or placebo) and expected pain levels (VAS) were assessed before and halfway through the treatment. Looking at actual treatment allocation, there was no specific effect of active acupuncture (P=.240), but there was a large and significant nonspecific effect of placebo acupuncture (P<.001), which increased over time. Interestingly, however, looking at perceived treatment allocation, there was a significant effect of acupuncture (P<.001), indicating that patients who believed they received active acupuncture had significantly lower pain levels than those who believed they received placebo acupuncture. Expected pain levels accounted for significant and progressively larger amounts of the variance in pain ratings after both active and placebo acupuncture (up to 69.8%). This is the first study to show that under optimized blinding conditions, nonspecific factors such as patients' perception of and expectations toward treatment are central to the efficacy of acupuncture analgesia and that these factors may contribute to self-reinforcing effects in acupuncture treatment. To obtain an effect of acupuncture in clinical practice, it may therefore be important to incorporate and optimize these factors.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acupuncture analgesia; Expectation; Nonspecific; Perception; Placebo analgesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707680      PMCID: PMC3981538          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  24 in total

1.  Expectancy in real and sham electroacupuncture: does believing make it so?

Authors:  Joshua Bauml; Sharon X Xie; John T Farrar; Marjorie A Bowman; Susan Q Li; Deborah Bruner; Angela DeMichele; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2014-11

2.  Side effects can enhance treatment response through expectancy effects: an experimental analgesic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chantal Berna; Irving Kirsch; Sean R Zion; Yvonne C Lee; Karin B Jensen; Pamela Sadler; Ted J Kaptchuk; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Pilot clinical trial of a clinical meditation and imagery intervention for chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jeanne M Zanca; Christine Gilchrist; Caroline E Ortiz; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.040

Review 4.  Current Tracking on Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Acupuncture Therapy: A Literature Review of High-Quality Studies.

Authors:  Fu-Ming Yang; Lin Yao; Shen-Jun Wang; Yi Guo; Zhi-Fang Xu; Chien-Hung Zhang; Kuo Zhang; Yu-Xin Fang; Yang-Yang Liu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  Measuring nonspecific factors in treatment: item banks that assess the healthcare experience and attitudes from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Carol M Greco; Lan Yu; Kelly L Johnston; Nathan E Dodds; Natalia E Morone; Ronald M Glick; Michael J Schneider; Mary Lou Klem; Christine E McFarland; Suzanne Lawrence; Jason Colditz; Catherine C Maihoefer; Wayne B Jonas; Neal D Ryan; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Acupuncture is ineffective for chronic low back pain? A critical analysis and rethinking.

Authors:  Xuqiang Wei; Baoyan Liu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Applying the PRECIS-2 tool for self-declared 'pragmatic' acupuncture trials: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Jinwoong Lim; Hyeonhoon Lee; Yong-Suk Kim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Chronic pelvic pain in women: an embedded qualitative study to evaluate the perceived benefits of the meridian balance method electro-acupuncture treatment, health consultation and National Health Service standard care.

Authors:  Ooi Thye Chong; Hilary Od Critchley; Andrew W Horne; Marie Fallon; Erna Haraldsdottir
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2018-11-21

9.  The impact of meridian balance method electro-acupuncture treatment on chronic pelvic pain in women: a three-armed randomised controlled feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Ooi Thye Chong; Hilary Od Critchley; Linda J Williams; Erna Haraldsdottir; Andrew W Horne; Marie Fallon
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 10.  Placebo Devices as Effective Control Methods in Acupuncture Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claire Shuiqing Zhang; Hsiewe Ying Tan; George Shengxi Zhang; Anthony Lin Zhang; Charlie Changli Xue; Yi Min Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.