Literature DB >> 23706925

Contrast curves of five different intraoral X-ray sensors: a technical note.

Dan Dominik Brüllmann1, Benedikt Kempkes, Bernd d'Hoedt, Ralf Schulze.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to compare the contrast and resolution properties of five different sensors using a known technical target.
METHODS: Stripe patterns with defined amounts of line pairs per mm (2.5-20 LP/mm) were recorded using five commercial digital sensors. Image data were analyzed using ImageJ and MatLab to calculate different contrast curves using logistic regression.
RESULTS: The Dexis Platinum Sensor reached a calculated 10% contrast at 29.52 LP/mm. The Duerr VistaRay 6 Sensor reached a 10% contrast at 9.9 LP/mm. The 10% contrast was found at 18.8 LP/mm for the Duerr VistaRay 7. The Sirona Xios+ Sensor reached a calculated 10% contrast at 13.9 LP/mm. The Sirona Fullsize charge-coupled device (CCD) Sensor exhibited 10% contrast at 10.3 LP/mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The contrast transfer function assessment used in the study confirmed that the spatial frequency at 10% contrast was much lower than the theoretical resolution computed from the pixel size.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23706925     DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol


  4 in total

1.  Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.

Authors:  J Shan; A W Tucker; L R Gaalaas; G Wu; E Platin; A Mol; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The impact of digital filters on the diagnosis of simulated root resorptions in digital radiographic systems.

Authors:  Nicolly Oliveira-Santos; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Débora Costa Ruiz; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Wilson Gustavo Cral; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today?

Authors:  D Brüllmann; R K W Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  In vitro comparison of two types of digital X-ray sensors for proximal caries detection validated by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Katrin Heck; Friederike Litzenburger; Verena Ullmann; Lea Hoffmann; Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.419

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.