Literature DB >> 23706654

Great saphenous vein surgery without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction.

Paolo Casoni1, Marc Lefebvre-Vilardebo, Fabio Villa, Piero Corona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether great saphenous vein (GSV) surgery without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) is beneficial in terms of varicose vein recurrence.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized trial set in a private practice. From December 2000 to May 2004, 120 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated preoperatively to two groups undergoing GSV surgery with (group A, n = 60) or without (group B, n = 60) high ligation of the SFJ. In four patients (two in each group), both limbs were operated on. Inclusion criteria were primary varicose veins with SFJ incompetence resulting in GSV reflux. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, inability to give informed consent, associated small saphenous vein incompetence, and prior GSV surgery. Mean follow-up was 8 years and was complete in all but one patient (99.2%). The primary end point was varicose vein recurrence, defined as treated lower limbs with new thigh varices at clinical evaluation (CEAP ≥ 2) or venous reflux at the thigh or groin level, as assessed by duplex ultrasound imaging.
RESULTS: The follow-up included 123 limbs. The combined clinical and ultrasound-determined recurrence rate was 24.4% (30 of 123): 32.2% (20 of 62) in group A vs 16.4% (10 of 61) in group B (P = .045). Postoperatively, recurrence of even minimal varices was observed in 24 limbs (19.5%): 18 of 62 (29.0%) in group A vs six of 61 (9.8%) in group B (P = .014). The ultrasound-detected recurrence rate was 22% (27 of 123): 32.2% (20 of 62) in group A vs 11.4% (7 of 61) in group B (P = .010). The average time to recurrence was 3.5 ± 1.2 years in group A and 4.1 ± 1.6 years in group B (P = .258).
CONCLUSIONS: GSV surgery without high ligation of the SFJ is associated with low rates of clinical and ultrasound-determined recurrence of varicose veins.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23706654     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  3 in total

Review 1.  Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods.

Authors:  Cestmir Recek
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03-23

2.  Feasibility and potential significance of prophylactic ablation of the major ascending tributaries in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein: A case series.

Authors:  Lars Müller; Jens Alm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessment of residual stumps 12 months after saphenectomy without high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction.

Authors:  Giovanna Golin Guarinello; Francisco Eduardo Coral; Jorge Rufino Ribas Timi; Sarah Folly Machado
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2021-07-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.