BACKGROUND: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of cyclophosphamide with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (C-PEB) in children with high-risk malignant germ cell tumors (HR-MGCT). PROCEDURE: Eligibility criteria included untreated patients ≤ 21 years of age with stage III/IV extragonadal, extra cranial MGCT. Patients received four cycles (repeated every 3 weeks) of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) /day × 5 days), etoposide (100 mg/m(2) /day × 5 days), and bleomycin (15 mg/m(2) on Day 1) with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide on Day 1, assigned at the time of enrollment (1.2, 1.8, or 2.4 g/m(2)). Patients with complete response had therapy discontinued. Patients with residual disease underwent second-look surgery, those with pathologic evidence of residual MGCT or whose markers had not normalized received two more cycles. All other patients had protocol therapy stopped. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled between July 2004 and August 2007. Three patients were non-evaluable. Sixteen patients completed four cycles. Eleven had complete response, one had progressive disease and four had partial response. All four with partial response underwent second look surgery followed by two more cycles. Only one patient, on dose 1.8 g/m(2), experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of therapy (grade 3 hyperglycemia). The 4-year EFS and OS (± standard deviation) were 74 ± 7% and 89 ± 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of cyclophosphamide to the standard PEB regimen (cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin) is feasible and well-tolerated at all dose levels used on this study.
BACKGROUND: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of cyclophosphamide with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (C-PEB) in children with high-risk malignant germ cell tumors (HR-MGCT). PROCEDURE: Eligibility criteria included untreated patients ≤ 21 years of age with stage III/IV extragonadal, extra cranial MGCT. Patients received four cycles (repeated every 3 weeks) of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) /day × 5 days), etoposide (100 mg/m(2) /day × 5 days), and bleomycin (15 mg/m(2) on Day 1) with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide on Day 1, assigned at the time of enrollment (1.2, 1.8, or 2.4 g/m(2)). Patients with complete response had therapy discontinued. Patients with residual disease underwent second-look surgery, those with pathologic evidence of residual MGCT or whose markers had not normalized received two more cycles. All other patients had protocol therapy stopped. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled between July 2004 and August 2007. Three patients were non-evaluable. Sixteen patients completed four cycles. Eleven had complete response, one had progressive disease and four had partial response. All four with partial response underwent second look surgery followed by two more cycles. Only one patient, on dose 1.8 g/m(2), experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of therapy (grade 3 hyperglycemia). The 4-year EFS and OS (± standard deviation) were 74 ± 7% and 89 ± 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of cyclophosphamide to the standard PEB regimen (cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin) is feasible and well-tolerated at all dose levels used on this study.
Authors: Neyssa Marina; Kay W Chang; Marcio Malogolowkin; Wendy B London; A Lindsay Frazier; Richard B Womer; Frederick Rescorla; Deborah F Billmire; Mary M Davis; Elizabeth J Perlman; Roger Giller; Stephen J Lauer; Thomas A Olson Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: B H Kushner; G Heller; N K Cheung; N Wollner; K Kramer; D Bajorin; T Polyak; P A Meyers Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Barbara Cushing; Roger Giller; John W Cullen; Neyssa M Marina; Stephen J Lauer; Thomas A Olson; Paul C Rogers; Paul Colombani; Frederick Rescorla; Deborah F Billmire; Charles D Vinocur; Edith P Hawkins; Mary Margaret Davis; Elizabeth J Perlman; Wendy B London; Robert P Castleberry Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Furqan Shaikh; John W Cullen; Thomas A Olson; Farzana Pashankar; Marcio H Malogolowkin; James F Amatruda; Doojduen Villaluna; Mark Krailo; Deborah F Billmire; Frederick J Rescorla; Rachel A Egler; Bryan J Dicken; Jonathan H Ross; Marc Schlatter; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Lindsay Frazier; Juliet P Hale; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Ha Dang; Thomas Olson; Matthew J Murray; James F Amatruda; Claire Thornton; G Suren Arul; Deborah Billmire; Furqan Shaikh; Farzana Pashankar; Sara Stoneham; Mark Krailo; James C Nicholson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas A Olson; Matthew J Murray; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; James C Nicholson; Deborah F Billmire; Mark D Krailo; Ha M Dang; James F Amatruda; Claire M Thornton; G Suren Arul; Sara J Stoneham; Farzana Pashankar; Daniel Stark; Furqan Shaikh; David M Gershenson; Allan Covens; Jean Hurteau; Sally P Stenning; Darren R Feldman; Peter S Grimison; Robert A Huddart; Christopher Sweeney; Thomas Powles; Luiz Fernando Lopes; Simone dos Santos Agular; Girish Chinnaswamy; Sahar Khaleel; Sherif Abouelnaga; Juliet P Hale; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544