Literature DB >> 15999362

Amifostine does not protect against the ototoxicity of high-dose cisplatin combined with etoposide and bleomycin in pediatric germ-cell tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Neyssa Marina1, Kay W Chang, Marcio Malogolowkin, Wendy B London, A Lindsay Frazier, Richard B Womer, Frederick Rescorla, Deborah F Billmire, Mary M Davis, Elizabeth J Perlman, Roger Giller, Stephen J Lauer, Thomas A Olson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-dose cisplatin combined with etoposide and bleomycin (HDPEB) improves event-free survival (EFS) in advanced pediatric germ-cell tumors (PGCT), but has significant ototoxicity. Amifostine appears to protect against toxicity. The authors combined amifostine with HDPEB and evaluated the efficacy and toxicity, specifically whether ototoxicity decreased.
METHODS: Eligibility criteria included age < 15 years and unresectable Stage III/IV extracranial, extragonadal PGCT. Patients received bleomycin 15 IU/m(2) on Day 1, then etoposide 100 mg/m(2) per day, amifostine 825 mg/m(2) per day, and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2)per day on Days 1-5, intravenously. The cycles were repeated every 3-4 weeks with imaging evaluation after 4 cycles. Patients with residual radiographic abnormalities underwent resection. Patients with residual tumor received two additional HDPEB cycles. Hearing evaluations were required at diagnosis and after two and four cycles. Audiologic results were reviewed and compared with historical controls treated with HDPEB.
RESULTS: Twenty-five eligible patients were enrolled between April 2000 and April 2002. Their median age was 1.6 years (range, 0.64-13.9 years), 17 patients were female, 11 had metastases, and 24 had a yolk sac carcinoma component histologically. Primary sites included sacrococcygeal area/pelvis (n = 15), vagina (n = 5), and other (n = 5). Two-year EFS and overall survival were 83.5% +/- 12.8% and 85.6% +/- 12.3%, respectively. Eight patients were removed from the study (four had progressive disease/disease recurrence and four had ototoxicity). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (n = 20), thrombocytopenia (n = 14), electrolyte imbalances (n = 14), and gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 12). Twenty-four of 25 patients received hearing evaluations, and 75% had significant hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Amifostine did not protect against HDPEB-associated ototoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999362     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

Review 1.  Platinum-induced ototoxicity: a review of prevailing ototoxicity criteria.

Authors:  Sofia Waissbluth; Emilia Peleva; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Systemic application of honokiol prevents cisplatin ototoxicity without compromising its antitumor effect.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tan; Yingjie Zhou; Aditi Agarwal; Michelle Lim; Yingyue Xu; Yueming Zhu; Joseph O'Brien; Elizabeth Tran; Jing Zheng; David Gius; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Evaluation of amifostine for protection against cisplatin-induced serious hearing loss in children treated for average-risk or high-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  James G Gurney; Johnnie K Bass; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Jie Huang; Murali Chintagumpala; Eric Bouffet; Tim Hassall; Sridharan Gururangan; John A Heath; Stewart Kellie; Richard Cohn; Michael J Fisher; Atmaram Pai Panandiker; Thomas E Merchant; Ashok Srinivasan; Cynthia Wetmore; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Clinton F Stewart; Gregory T Armstrong; Alberto Broniscer; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity and Prevention.

Authors:  Leonard P Rybak; Debashree Mukherjea; Vickram Ramkumar
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2019-04-26

Review 5.  Systematic review of agents for the management of gastrointestinal mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Rachel J Gibson; Dorothy M K Keefe; Rajesh V Lalla; Emma Bateman; Nicole Blijlevens; Margot Fijlstra; Emily E King; Andrea M Stringer; Walter J F M van der Velden; Roger Yazbeck; Sharon Elad; Joanne M Bowen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Amifostine protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children with average-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Maryam Fouladi; Murali Chintagumpala; David Ashley; Stewart Kellie; Sridharan Gururangan; Tim Hassall; Lindsey Gronewold; Clinton F Stewart; Dana Wallace; Alberto Broniscer; Gregory A Hale; Kimberly A Kasow; Thomas E Merchant; Brannon Morris; Matthew Krasin; Larry E Kun; James M Boyett; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Protective effect of metformin against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in an auditory cell line.

Authors:  Jiwon Chang; Hak Hyun Jung; Ji Yoon Yang; Sehee Lee; June Choi; Gi Jung Im; Sung Won Chae
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-03

8.  Cisplatin and cranial irradiation-related hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Rajasekharan Warrier; Aman Chauhan; Murali Davluri; Sonya L Tedesco; Joseph Nadell; Randall Craver
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

9.  Pilot study of cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin, and escalating dose cyclophosphamide therapy for children with high risk germ cell tumors: a report of the children's oncology group (COG).

Authors:  Marcio H Malogolowkin; Mark Krailo; Neyssa Marina; Thomas Olson; A Lindsay Frazier
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 10.  Cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics: hearing loss and its prevention.

Authors:  Jochen Schacht; Andra E Talaska; Leonard P Rybak
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.