BACKGROUND: Thyroid and parathyroid procedures historically have been viewed as inpatient procedures. Because of the advancements in surgical techniques, these procedures were transferred from the inpatient operating room (OR) to the outpatient OR at a single academic institution approximately 7 y ago. The goal of this study was to determine whether this change has decreased turnover times and maximized OR utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 707 patients undergoing thyroid (34%) and parathyroid (66%) procedures by a single surgeon at our academic institution between 2005 and 2008. Inpatient and outpatient groups were compared using Student t-test, chi-square test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test where appropriate. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine how patient and hospital factors influenced turnover times. RESULTS: Turnover times were significantly lower in the outpatient OR (mean 18 ± 0.7 min) when compared with the inpatient OR (mean 36 ± 1.4 min) (P < 0.001). When compared by type of procedure, all turnover times remained significantly lower in the outpatient OR. Patients in both ORs were similar in age, gender, and comorbidities. However, inpatients had a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2.30 versus 2.13, P < 0.001) and were more likely to have an operative indication of cancer (23.1% versus 9.2%, P < 0.001). Using multiple regression, the inpatient OR remained highly significantly associated with higher turnover times when controlling for these small differences (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endocrine procedures performed in the outpatient OR have significantly faster turnover times leading to cost savings and greater OR utilization for hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Thyroid and parathyroid procedures historically have been viewed as inpatient procedures. Because of the advancements in surgical techniques, these procedures were transferred from the inpatient operating room (OR) to the outpatient OR at a single academic institution approximately 7 y ago. The goal of this study was to determine whether this change has decreased turnover times and maximized OR utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 707 patients undergoing thyroid (34%) and parathyroid (66%) procedures by a single surgeon at our academic institution between 2005 and 2008. Inpatient and outpatient groups were compared using Student t-test, chi-square test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test where appropriate. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine how patient and hospital factors influenced turnover times. RESULTS: Turnover times were significantly lower in the outpatient OR (mean 18 ± 0.7 min) when compared with the inpatient OR (mean 36 ± 1.4 min) (P < 0.001). When compared by type of procedure, all turnover times remained significantly lower in the outpatient OR. Patients in both ORs were similar in age, gender, and comorbidities. However, inpatients had a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2.30 versus 2.13, P < 0.001) and were more likely to have an operative indication of cancer (23.1% versus 9.2%, P < 0.001). Using multiple regression, the inpatient OR remained highly significantly associated with higher turnover times when controlling for these small differences (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endocrine procedures performed in the outpatient OR have significantly faster turnover times leading to cost savings and greater OR utilization for hospitals.
Authors: T A Kenyon; D R Urbach; J B Speer; B Waterman-Hukari; G F Foraker; P D Hansen; L L Swanström Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2001-07-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Franklin Dexter; Amr E Abouleish; Richard H Epstein; Charles W Whitten; David A Lubarsky Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: David J Terris; Brent Moister; Melanie W Seybt; Christine G Gourin; Edward Chin Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Bruce Lee Hall; Mitzi Hirbe; Yan Yan; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Barton H Hamilton Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: F P Prete; P C Panzera; G Di Meo; A Pasculli; L I Sgaramella; G Calculli; R Dimonte; F Ferrarese; M Testini; A Gurrado Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: Sarah C Oltmann; Amal Y Alhefdhi; Mohammad H Rajaei; David F Schneider; Rebecca S Sippel; Herbert Chen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Asmae Toumi; Catherine DiGennaro; Vahab Vahdat; Mohammad S Jalali; G Scott Gazelle; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Rachel R Kelz; Carrie C Lubitz Journal: Thyroid Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 6.506