| Literature DB >> 23702146 |
Linda Cosenza1, Vincenza Pezzella, Rita Nocerino, Margherita Di Costanzo, Anna Coruzzo, Annalisa Passariello, Ludovica Leone, Marcella Savoia, Antonio Del Puente, Antonella Esposito, Gianluca Terrin, Roberto Berni Canani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Calcium (Ca(2+)) and vitamin D (VitD) play an important role in child health. We evaluated the daily intake of Ca(2+) and VitD in healthy children. Moreover, we demonstrate the efficacy of Ca(2+) and VitD supplementation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23702146 PMCID: PMC3665520 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-86
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Baseline main demographic and clinic characteristics of subjects enrolled in the randomized trial
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.3 | 11.4 | |
| (9.9-16.6) | (8.5-14.1) | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 49.0 | 44.6 | |
| (37.1-60.9) | (29.9-59.3) | |
| 60 | 59 | |
| (38–82) | (33–86) | |
| 146 | 141 | |
| (132–160) | (127–155) | |
| 40 | 43 | |
| (17–63) | (15–71) | |
| 22.1 | 21.3 | |
| (18.9-25.2) | (17.7-24.9) | |
| 63 | 69 | |
| (39–87) | (48–90) | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| (3–6) | (4–7) |
Calcium and Vitamin D daily dietary intake at baseline (T0) and after four months of nutritional intervention (T1) in the two study groups
| | | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 507 | 588 | 0.174 | 1.55 | 1.98 | 0.705 | |
| (221; 93–728) | (353.5; 275–844) | | (2.23; 0.03-4.3) | (3.03; 0.1-3.58) | ||
| 907.5* | 925* | 0.790 | 12.11** | 2.40 | <.001 | |
| (217.75; 741–1591) | (401; 536–1201) | (3.40; 10.3-15.79) | (2.14; 0.43-5.38) | |||
° Calcium and vitamin D intake was calculated considering amount received by supplementation with the study product. *T0 vs T1 p<0.001; ** T0 vs T1 p=0.013.
Data are expressed as median (IQR; range).
Caand VitD% DRI at baseline (T0) and after four months of nutritional intervention (T1) in the two study groups
| | | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.6 | 60.95 | 0.082 | 15.55 | 19.8 | 0.705 | |
| (27.38; 7.75-61) | (24.22; 22.91-70.33) | (22.28; 0.3-43) | (30.33; 1–35.8) | |||
| 75.62* | 79.33** | 0.722 | 121.15* | 24 | <.001 | |
| (29.5; 61.75-198.87) | (31.15; 67–113.87) | (33.98; 103–157.9) | (21.4; 4.3-53.8) | |||
*T0 vs T1 p<0.001; ** T0 vs T1 p=0.008.
Data are expressed as median (IQR; range).
Figure 1Serum 25(OH)D levels observed at baseline (T0) and after four months of nutritional interventions (T1) in the two study groups.