Literature DB >> 22525849

Vitamin D: extraskeletal health.

Michael F Holick1.   

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency and likely the most common medical condition in the world. There is a multitude of causes of vitamin D deficiency, but the major cause has been the lack of appreciation that the body requires 5- to 10-fold higher intakes than is currently recommended by the Institute of Medicine and other health agencies. It is likely that our hunter gatherer fore-fathers being exposed to sunlight on a daily basis were making several thousand IU of vitamin D a day. The fact that 100 IU of vitamin D prevented overt signs of rickets led to the false security that ingesting twice this amount was more than adequate to satisfy the body’s vitamin D requirement. Although this may be true for preventing overt skeletal deformities associated with rickets, there is now overwhelming and compelling scientific and epidemiologic data suggesting that the human body requires a blood level of 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL for maximum health. The likely reason is that essentially every tissue and cell in the body has a VDR and thus, to have enough vitamin D to satisfy all of these cellular requirements, the blood level of 25(OH)D needs to be above 30 ng/mL. It has been estimated that for every 100 IU of vitamin D ingested that the blood level of 25(OH)D increases by 1 ng/mL. Thus to theoretically achieve a blood level above 30 ng/mL requires the ingestion of 3000 IU of vitamin D a day. There is evidence, however, that when the blood levels of 25(OH)D are less than 15 ng/mL, the body is able to more efficiently use vitamin D to raise the blood level to about 20 ng/mL. To raise the blood level of 25(OH)D above 20 ng/mL requires the ingestion of 100 IU of vitamin D for every 1-ng increase; therefore to increase the blood level to the minimum 30 ng/mL requires the ingestion of at least 1000 IU of vitamin D a day for adults. There is a great need to significantly increase the recommended adequate intakes of vitamin D. All neonates during the first year of life should take at least 400 IU/d of vitamin D, and increasing it to 1000 IU/d may provide additional health benefits. Children 1 year and older should take at least 400 IU/d of vitamin D as recently recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, but they should consider increasing intake up to 2000 IU/d derive maximum health benefits from vitamin D. Prepubertal and teenage girls who received 2000 IU of vitamin D per day for a year showed improvement in their musculoskeletal health with no untoward toxicity. All adults should be taking 2000 IU of vitamin D per day. A recent study reported that adults who took 50,000 IU of vitamin D once every 2 weeks, which is equivalent to taking 3000 IU of vitamin D a day, for up to 6 years was effective in maintaining blood levels of 25(OH)D of between 40 and 60 ng/mL without any toxicity. There is no downside to increasing either a child’s or adult’s vitamin D intake, with the exception of acquired disorders such as granulomatous diseases including sarcoidosis and tuberculosis, as well as some lymphomas with activated macrophages that produce 1,25(OH)2D3 in an unregulated fashion.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22525849     DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-857X            Impact factor:   2.670


  44 in total

Review 1.  The role of micronutrients in the response to ambient air pollutants: Potential mechanisms and suggestions for research design.

Authors:  Colette N Miller; Srujana Rayalam
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Vitamin D measurement and effect on outcome in a cohort of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Federica Saponaro; Alessandro Saba; Sabina Frascarelli; Concetta Prontera; Aldo Clerico; Marco Scalese; Maria Rita Sessa; Filomena Cetani; Simona Borsari; Elena Pardi; Antonella Marvelli; Claudio Marcocci; Claudio Passino; Riccardo Zucchi
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.335

3.  Vitamin D Supplementation in Nursing Home Residents: Randomized Single Cholecalciferol Loading Protocol vs. Individualized Loading Dose Regimen.

Authors:  C Delomas; M Hertzog; T Vogel; P O Lang
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Fatal Outcome of Accidental Vitamin D Overdose.

Authors:  Praveen Narsaria; Jhuma Sankar; Rakesh Lodha
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  How important is vitamin D in preventing infections?

Authors:  P O Lang; N Samaras; D Samaras; R Aspinall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Vitamin D for health: a global perspective.

Authors:  Arash Hossein-nezhad; Michael F Holick
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Topics on vitamin D in systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis of evidence and critical literature review.

Authors:  António Marinho; Mariana Taveira; Carlos Vasconcelos
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.829

8.  Contribution of vitamin D insufficiency to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Charles Pierrot-Deseilligny; Jean-Claude Souberbielle
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.570

9.  The effects of season-long vitamin D supplementation on collegiate swimmers and divers.

Authors:  Regina M Lewis; Maja Redzic; D Travis Thomas
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Muscle function is impaired in patients with "asymptomatic" primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Lars Rolighed; Anne Kristine Amstrup; Niels Frederik Breum Jakobsen; Tanja Sikjaer; Leif Mosekilde; Peer Christiansen; Lars Rejnmark
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.