Literature DB >> 23701901

Associations between access to farmers' markets and supermarkets, shopping patterns, fruit and vegetable consumption and health indicators among women of reproductive age in eastern North Carolina, U.S.A.

Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts1, Qiang Wu, Jared T McGuirt, Thomas W Crawford, Thomas C Keyserling, Alice S Ammerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined associations between access to food venues (farmers’ markets and supermarkets), shopping patterns, fruit and vegetable consumption and health indicators among women of reproductive age in eastern North Carolina, U.S.A.
DESIGN: Access to food venues was measured using a Geographic Information System incorporating distance, seasonality and business hours, to quantify access to farmers’ markets. Produce consumption was assessed by self-report of eating five or more fruits and vegetables daily. BMI and blood pressure were assessed by clinical measurements. Poisson regression with robust variance was used for dichotomous outcomes and multiple linear regression was used for continuous outcomes. As the study occurred in a university town and university students are likely to have different shopping patterns from non-students, we stratified analyses by student status.
SETTING: Eastern North Carolina.
SUBJECTS: Low-income women of reproductive age (18–44 years) with valid address information accessing family planning services at a local health department (n 400).
RESULTS: Over a quarter reported ever shopping at farmers’ markets (114/400). A larger percentage of women who shopped at farmers’ markets consumed five or more fruits and vegetables daily (42.1%) than those who did not (24.0%; P < 0.001). The mean objectively measured distance to the farmers’ markets where women reported shopping was 11.4 (SD 9.0) km (7.1 (SD 5.6) miles), while the mean distance to the farmers’ market closest to the residence was 4.0 (SD 3.7) km (2.5 (SD 2.3) miles).
CONCLUSIONS: Among non-students, those who shopped at farmers’ markets were more likely to consume five or more servings of fruits and vegetables daily. Future research should further explore potential health benefits of farmers’ markets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23701901      PMCID: PMC3795819          DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  23 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Food-purchasing patterns for home: a grocery store-intercept survey.

Authors:  Sunmi Yoo; Tom Baranowski; Mariam Missaghian; Janice Baranowski; Karen Cullen; Jennifer O Fisher; Kathy Watson; Issa F Zakeri; Theresa Nicklas
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Comparing Perception-Based and Geographic Information System (GIS)-based characterizations of the local food environment.

Authors:  Latetia V Moore; Ana V Diez Roux; Shannon Brines
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Health behaviors among women of reproductive age with and without a history of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Edith C Kieffer; Brandy Sinco; Catherine Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Associations between body mass index, shopping behaviors, amenity density, and characteristics of the neighborhood food environment among female adult Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Jared T McGuirt; Lucas J Carr; Qiang Wu; Thomas C Keyserling
Journal:  Ecol Food Nutr       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.692

6.  You are where you shop: grocery store locations, weight, and neighborhoods.

Authors:  Sanae Inagami; Deborah A Cohen; Brian Karl Finch; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Measuring the food environment: state of the science.

Authors:  Leslie A Lytle
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Obesity prevalence and the local food environment.

Authors:  Kimberly B Morland; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Neighborhood food environment and walkability predict obesity in New York City.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Lance Freeman; Gina S Lovasi; Marnie Purciel; James Quinn; Catherine Richards; Neelanjan Sircar; Christopher Weiss
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Relation between local food environments and obesity among adults.

Authors:  John C Spence; Nicoleta Cutumisu; Joy Edwards; Kim D Raine; Karen Smoyer-Tomic
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  27 in total

1.  Factors influencing local food procurement among women of reproductive age in rural eastern and western North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Jared T McGuirt; Rachel Ward; Nadya Majette Elliott; Sally Lawrence Bullock; Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts
Journal:  J Agric Food Syst Community Dev       Date:  2014

2.  A qualitative study of shopper experiences at an urban farmers' market using the Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Farryl Bertmann; Eric B Hekler; Sandra J Winter; Jylana L Sheats; Abby C King; Christopher M Wharton
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Associations between frequency of food shopping at different food sources and fruit and vegetable intake among rural residents in upstate New York, USA.

Authors:  Brian K Lo; Sarah Megiel; Evelyn Liu; Sara C Folta; Meredith L Graham; Rebecca A Seguin
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Examining the Association between Intervention-Related Changes in Diet, Physical Activity, and Weight as Moderated by the Food and Physical Activity Environments among Rural, Southern Adults.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Thomas C Keyserling; Larry F Johnston; Kelly R Evenson; Jared T McGuirt; Ziya Gizlice; Olivia R Whitt; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Associations between neighborhood-level factors related to a healthful lifestyle and dietary intake, physical activity, and support for obesity prevention polices among rural adults.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Thomas C Keyserling; Larry F Johnston; Tosha W Smith; Jared T McGuirt; Kelly R Evenson; Ann P Rafferty; Ziya Gizlice; Beverly A Garcia; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

6.  Do entrepreneurial food systems innovations impact rural economies and health? Evidence and gaps.

Authors:  Marilyn Sitaker; Jane Kolodinsky; Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Rebecca A Seguin
Journal:  Am J Entrep       Date:  2014

7.  Farm-to-Consumer Retail Outlet Use, Fruit and Vegetable Intake, and Obesity Status among WIC Program Participants in Alabama.

Authors:  Chelsea R Singleton; Monica Baskin; Emily B Levitan; Bisakha Sen; Ermanno Affuso; Olivia Affuso
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2016-07

8.  Development and Validation of a Farmers' Market Audit Tool in Rural and Urban Communities.

Authors:  Carmen Byker Shanks; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Alison Gustafson
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Farmers' Market Utilization among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients in New Orleans, Louisiana: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Henry Nuss; Meg Skizim; Hasheemah Afaneh; Lucio Miele; Melinda Sothern
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Incentivizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchasers at Fresh Markets in Lower 9th Ward, New Orleans.

Authors:  Rashida Ferdinand; Rosamar Torres; Jennifer Scott; Imran Saeed; Richard Scribner
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.