Literature DB >> 23700184

Three-dimensional laparoscopy: a new tool in the surgeon's armamentarium.

Nicolas C Buchs1, Philippe Morel1.   

Abstract

With the introduction of laparoscopy more than 20 years ago, the surgeon has been confronted with several new challenges. First, the loss of the depth perception (two-dimensional [2D] vision) is a clear handicap during the initial learning curve. Then, the reduced dexterity with the current available instruments remains a drawback of classic minimally invasive surgery. Since the beginning of the 2000s, the advent of robotic surgery has given back the three-dimensional (3D) vision thanks to the two camera channels. In addition, the dexterity was restored, with the "endowristed" technology (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). In parallel, several groups have tested and evaluated new cameras for 3D laparoscopy with interesting results. Yet, the real advantages have still to be proven. On the other hand, restoring the 3D vision is clearly a step forward to all the possibilities associated with augmented reality. Reviewing the current literature, this article shows the interest in the use of 3D technology for laparoscopic surgery. In addition, future trends are explored, especially those concerning augmented and virtual reality coupled with 3D technology.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23700184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  7 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced Reality and Intraoperative Imaging in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Frederic Ris; Trevor Yeung; Roel Hompes; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Clinical evaluation and technical features of three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective segmental artery clamping.

Authors:  Yuan Ruan; Xiao-Hai Wang; Kui Wang; Yu-Yang Zhao; Shu-Jie Xia; Dong-Liang Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Antonino Agrusa; Giorgio Romano; Giuseppe Navarra; Giovanni Conzo; Gianni Pantuso; Giuseppe Di Buono; Roberto Citarrella; Massimo Galia; Attilio Lo Monte; Gaspare Cucinella; Gaspare Gulotta
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-19

5.  3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonino Agrusa; Giuseppe Di Buono; Salvatore Buscemi; Gaspare Cucinella; Giorgio Romano; Gaspare Gulotta
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinsheng Zhang; Weibin Zhang; Zhen Feng; Zhiwei Sun; Qianshi Zhang; Shuangyi Ren
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  3D Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary repair by absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible.

Authors:  Yen Pin Tan; Cheryl Lim; Sameer P Junnarkar; Cheong Wei Terence Huey; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.