Literature DB >> 23700009

Significance, truth and proof of p values: reminders about common misconceptions regarding null hypothesis significance testing.

Mathilde G E Verdam1, Frans J Oort, Mirjam A G Sprangers.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23700009     DOI： 10.1007/s11136-013-0437-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives.

Authors:  D N Glaser
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-06

Review 3.  Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman; Jeff A Sloan; Kathleen W Wyrwich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The scales were highly correlated: P = 0.0001.

Authors:  Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.147
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists.

Authors:  Laura Badenes-Ribera; Dolores Frias-Navarro; Bryan Iotti; Amparo Bonilla-Campos; Claudio Longobardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.