Literature DB >> 23699528

Differential effects of dual and unihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in older adults.

Robert Lindenberg1, Laura Nachtigall, Marcus Meinzer, Mira Maria Sieg, Agnes Flöel.   

Abstract

Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is thought to upregulate excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) using anodal stimulation while concurrently downregulating contralateral M1 using cathodal stimulation. This "dual" tDCS method enhances motor learning in healthy subjects and facilitates motor recovery after stroke. However, its impact on motor system activity and connectivity remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed neural correlates of dual and unihemispheric anodal tDCS effects in 20 healthy older subjects in a randomized, sham-controlled study using a cross-over design. Participants underwent tDCS and simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging during a choice reaction time task and at rest. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allowed us to relate potential functional changes to structural parameters. The resting-state analysis demonstrated that, compared with sham, both dual and anodal tDCS decreased connectivity of right hippocampus and M1 (contralateral to the anode position) while increasing connectivity in the left prefrontal cortex. Notably, dual but not anodal tDCS enhanced connectivity of the left dorsal posterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, dual tDCS yielded stronger activations in bilateral M1 compared with anodal tDCS when participants used either their left or right hand during the motor task. The corresponding tDCS-induced changes in laterality of activations were related to the microstructural status of transcallosal motor fibers. In conclusion, our results suggest that the impact of bihemispheric tDCS cannot be explained by mere add-on effects of anodal and concurrent cathodal stimulation, but rather by complex network modulations involving interhemispheric interactions and areas associated with motor control in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23699528      PMCID: PMC6705011          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0055-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Brain-State Extraction Algorithm Based on the State Transition (BEST): A Dynamic Functional Brain Network Analysis in fMRI Study.

Authors:  Young-Beom Lee; Kwangsun Yoo; Jee Hoon Roh; Won-Jin Moon; Yong Jeong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Robert Darkow; Andrew Martin; Anna Würtz; Agnes Flöel; Marcus Meinzer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the sensory-motor regions inhibits gamma synchrony.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Giorgio Arcara; Giovanni Di Pino; Cristina Turco; Matteo Maran; Luca Weis; Francesco Piccione; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Effects of 6-month at-home transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jooyeon Jamie Im; Hyeonseok Jeong; Marom Bikson; Adam J Woods; Gozde Unal; Jin Kyoung Oh; Seunghee Na; Jong-Sik Park; Helena Knotkova; In-Uk Song; Yong-An Chung
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.

Authors:  Stéphanie Lefebvre; Laurence Dricot; Patrice Laloux; Wojciech Gradkowski; Philippe Desfontaines; Frédéric Evrard; André Peeters; Jacques Jamart; Yves Vandermeeren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.