Literature DB >> 23697991

Lactate dehydrogenase B: a metabolic marker of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Jennifer B Dennison1, Jennifer R Molina, Shreya Mitra, Ana M González-Angulo, Justin M Balko, María G Kuba, Melinda E Sanders, Joseph A Pinto, Henry L Gómez, Carlos L Arteaga, Robert E Brown, Gordon B Mills.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although breast cancers are known to be molecularly heterogeneous, their metabolic phenotype is less well-understood and may predict response to chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate metabolic genes as individual predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: mRNA microarray data from breast cancer cell lines were used to identify bimodal genes-those with highest potential for robust high/low classification in clinical assays. Metabolic function was evaluated in vitro for the highest scoring metabolic gene, lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB). Its expression was associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and relapse within clinical and PAM50-derived subtypes.
RESULTS: LDHB was highly expressed in cell lines with glycolytic, basal-like phenotypes. Stable knockdown of LDHB in cell lines reduced glycolytic dependence, linking LDHB expression directly to metabolic function. Using patient datasets, LDHB was highly expressed in basal-like cancers and could predict basal-like subtype within clinical groups [OR = 21 for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative; OR = 10 for triple-negative]. Furthermore, high LDHB predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for both HR-positive/HER2-negative (OR = 4.1, P < 0.001) and triple-negative (OR = 3.0, P = 0.003) cancers. For triple-negative tumors without pCR, high LDHB posttreatment also identified proliferative tumors with increased risk of recurrence (HR = 2.2, P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Expression of LDHB predicted response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within clinical subtypes independently of standard prognostic markers and PAM50 subtyping. These observations support prospective clinical evaluation of LDHB as a predictive marker of response for patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23697991      PMCID: PMC3727144          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  42 in total

1.  Promoter hypermethylation in cancer silences LDHB, eliminating lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes 1-4.

Authors:  Masato Maekawa; Terumi Taniguchi; Jinko Ishikawa; Haruhiko Sugimura; Kokichi Sugano; Takashi Kanno
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Mammary development meets cancer genomics.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  TP53 genomics predict higher clinical and pathologic tumor response in operable early-stage breast cancer treated with docetaxel-capecitabine ± trastuzumab.

Authors:  Stefan Glück; Jeffrey S Ross; Melanie Royce; Edward F McKenna; Charles M Perou; Eli Avisar; Lin Wu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Lactate dehydrogenase B is required for the growth of KRAS-dependent lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Mark L McCleland; Adam S Adler; Laura Deming; Ely Cosino; Leslie Lee; Elizabeth M Blackwood; Margaret Solon; Janet Tao; Li Li; David Shames; Erica Jackson; William F Forrest; Ron Firestein
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Isozyme patterns of normal, benign, and malignant human breast tissues.

Authors:  D Balinsky; C E Platz; J W Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Systematic bias in genomic classification due to contaminating non-neoplastic tissue in breast tumor samples.

Authors:  Fathi Elloumi; Zhiyuan Hu; Yan Li; Joel S Parker; Margaret L Gulley; Keith D Amos; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Glutamine synthetase is a genetic determinant of cell type-specific glutamine independence in breast epithelia.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ni Kung; Jeffrey R Marks; Jen-Tsan Chi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard Possemato; Kevin M Marks; Yoav D Shaul; Michael E Pacold; Dohoon Kim; Kıvanç Birsoy; Shalini Sethumadhavan; Hin-Koon Woo; Hyun G Jang; Abhishek K Jha; Walter W Chen; Francesca G Barrett; Nicolas Stransky; Zhi-Yang Tsun; Glenn S Cowley; Jordi Barretina; Nada Y Kalaany; Peggy P Hsu; Kathleen Ottina; Albert M Chan; Bingbing Yuan; Levi A Garraway; David E Root; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Elena F Brachtel; Edward M Driggers; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  46 in total

1.  FASNating targets of metformin in breast cancer stem-like cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wellberg; Steven M Anderson
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  Global analysis of protein folding thermodynamics for disease state characterization.

Authors:  Jagat Adhikari; Graham M West; Michael C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Systematically defining single-gene determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals specific biomarkers.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Uthra Balaji; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  The latest progress in research on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): risk factors, possible therapeutic targets and prognostic markers.

Authors:  Qingli Jiao; Aiguo Wu; Guoli Shao; Haoyu Peng; Mengchuan Wang; Shufeng Ji; Peng Liu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Triple-negative breast cancer: bridging the gap from cancer genomics to predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  S Lindsey Davis; S Gail Eckhardt; John J Tentler; Jennifer R Diamond
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  LDHB may be a significant predictor of poor prognosis in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Chao Li; Yu Chen; Pingping Bai; Jiaqiang Wang; Zhenhui Liu; Tao Wang; Qiqing Cai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Combination Therapy: a Biodistribution and Efficacy Pilot Study.

Authors:  Giacomo Biagiotti; Federica Pisaneschi; Seth T Gammon; Fabrizio Machetti; Maria Cristina Ligi; Giuliano Giambastiani; Giulia Tuci; Emily Powell; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Erica Pranzini; Paolo Paoli; Stefano Cicchi; David Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  Suppressed expression of LDHB promotes pancreatic cancer progression via inducing glycolytic phenotype.

Authors:  Jiujie Cui; Ming Quan; Weihua Jiang; Hai Hu; Feng Jiao; Ning Li; Ziliang Jin; Lei Wang; Yu Wang; Liwei Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Cytoplasmic GPER translocation in cancer-associated fibroblasts mediates cAMP/PKA/CREB/glycolytic axis to confer tumor cells with multidrug resistance.

Authors:  T Yu; G Yang; Y Hou; X Tang; C Wu; X-A Wu; L Guo; Q Zhu; H Luo; Y-E Du; S Wen; L Xu; J Yin; G Tu; M Liu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Aberrant FGFR Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Enhances the Warburg Effect by Reprogramming LDH Isoform Expression and Activity in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Junchen Liu; Guo Chen; Zezhen Liu; Shaoyou Liu; Zhiduan Cai; Pan You; Yuepeng Ke; Li Lai; Yun Huang; Hongchang Gao; Liangcai Zhao; Helene Pelicano; Peng Huang; Wallace L McKeehan; Chin-Lee Wu; Cong Wang; Weide Zhong; Fen Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.