Literature DB >> 23696683

Investigational vertebroplasty safety and efficacy trial (INVEST): patient-reported outcomes through 1 year.

Bryan A Comstock1, Colleen M Sitlani, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Patrick J Heagerty, Judith A Turner, David F Kallmes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate 1-year outcomes of the Investigational Vertebroplasty Safety and Efficacy Trial (INVEST), a blinded, randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 11 sites in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia by using an institutional review board-approved protocol and HIPAA compliance, and all patients provided written informed consent. Patients were randomized to undergo vertebroplasty or a control procedure. After 1 month, patients were allowed to cross over and undergo the alternate procedure. Coprimary outcomes were patient-reported function, measured with the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and pain (on a scale of one to 10) at 1 year. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated (AT) analyses were used to compare outcomes.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one participants (68 in the vertebroplasty group and 63 in the control group) were included in the analyses. Patients in both groups showed improvements in pain and function at 1 year. In ITT analyses, patients randomized to vertebroplasty did not differ from control subjects in terms of RDQ results (difference, 1.37 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.88, 3.62; P = .231) but reported lower levels of pain (difference, 1.02 points; 95% CI: 0.04, 2.01; P = .042). Eleven of 68 patients who underwent vertebroplasty (16%) and 38 of 63 control subjects (60%) crossed over and elected to undergo the alternate procedure (P < .001). In AT analyses, patients treated with vertebroplasty did not differ from control subjects in terms of RDQ results (difference, 0.66 points; 95% CI: -1.98, 3.30; P = .625) or pain (difference, 0.85 points; 95% CI: -0.35, 2.05; P = .166).
CONCLUSION: Vertebroplasty may provide a modest reduction in pain at 1 year compared with a control procedure; however, no difference in functional disability was observed. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00068822. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696683      PMCID: PMC3781356          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Longitudinal structural mixed models for the analysis of surgical trials with noncompliance.

Authors:  Colleen M Sitlani; Patrick J Heagerty; Emily A Blood; Tor D Tosteson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: new treatment for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Thomas A Predey; Luke E Sewall; Steven J Smith
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; Peter R Ebeling; John D Wark; Peter Mitchell; Chris Wriedt; Stephen Graves; Margaret P Staples; Bridie Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo; S J Atlas; D E Singer; A Chapin; R B Keller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Dorcas Beaton; Charles S Cleeland; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Robert D Kerns; Deborah N Ader; Nancy Brandenburg; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Julie Chandler; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Henry J McQuay; Sanjay Patel; Linda Porter; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Dennis A Revicki; Margaret Rothman; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett R Stacey; Joseph W Stauffer; Thorsten von Stein; Richard E White; James Witter; Stojan Zavisic
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  A randomised sham controlled trial of vertebroplasty for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VERTOS IV).

Authors:  Cristina Firanescu; Paul Nm Lohle; Jolanda de Vries; Caroline A Klazen; Job R Juttmann; William Clark; Willem Jan van Rooij
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  INvestigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Leigh A Gray; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Patrick J Heagerty; William Hollingworth; Lydia Stout; Bryan A Comstock; Judith A Turner; David F Kallmes
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  VERTOS II: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C A H Klazen; H J J Verhaar; L E H Lampmann; J R Juttmann; M C Blonk; F H Jansen; A V Tielbeek; M C Schoemaker; E Buskens; Y van der Graaf; X Janssens; H Fransen; K J van Everdingen; A F Muller; W P Th M Mali; P N M Lohle
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Mario Muto; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Nicole Carter; Paola Crivelli; Emanuele Piras; Luca Saba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment.

Authors:  Konstantinos Martikos; Tiziana Greggi; Cesare Faldini; Francesco Vommaro; Antonio Scarale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Update of vertebral cementoplasty in porotic patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Guarnieri; Salvatore Masala; Mario Muto
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 5.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for vertebral compression fracture with osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Bao Guo; Yi Zhu; Bing-Lin Chen; Bin Xie; Wen-Yi Zhang; Yu-Jie Yang; Yu-Shan Yue; Xue-Qiang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Management of vertebral compression fracture in general practice: BEACH program.

Authors:  Rodrigo Z Megale; Allan Pollack; Helena Britt; Jane Latimer; Vasi Naganathan; Andrew J McLachlan; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: Placebo or effective?

Authors:  Arvin R Wali; Joel R Martin; Robert Rennert; Daniel K Resnick; William Taylor; Peter Warnke; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 8.  Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and long-term effects.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zuo; Xue-Piao Zhu; Hong-Guang Bao; Chen-Jie Xu; Hao Chen; Xian-Zhong Gao; Qian-Xi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-04

10.  Complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty: An analysis of 1100 procedures performed in 616 patients.

Authors:  Agnieszka Saracen; Zbigniew Kotwica
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.