BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and distressing symptom reported by breast cancer survivors. The primary aim of this study was to translate and evaluate psychometrically for the first time a Spanish version of the Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised (S-PFS-R). METHODS: One hundred and eleven women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer who had completed their primary cancer therapy in the previous 6 months with the exception of hormone therapy completed the S-PFS-R, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Fatigue (POMS-F) and Vigor subscales (POMS-V), and bilateral force handgrip testing. Data analysis included test-retest reliability, construct validity, criterion-related validity, and exploratory factor analyses. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (r > 0.86), and all subscales showed moderate to high construct validity estimates [corrected item-subscale correlations (Pearson r = ≥ 0.65)]. The exploratory factor analysis revealed four dimensions with 75.5% of the common variance explained. The S-PFS-R total score positively correlated with the POMS-F subscale (r = 0.50-0.78) and negatively with the POMS-V subscale (r = -0.13 to -0.44) confirming criterion-related validity. Negative correlations among force handgrip testing, subscales, and total scores were weak (r = -0.26 to -0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of PFS-R shows satisfactory psychometric properties in a sample of breast cancer survivors. This is the first study to translate the PFS-R into Spanish and further testing is warranted.
BACKGROUND:Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and distressing symptom reported by breast cancer survivors. The primary aim of this study was to translate and evaluate psychometrically for the first time a Spanish version of the Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised (S-PFS-R). METHODS: One hundred and eleven women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer who had completed their primary cancer therapy in the previous 6 months with the exception of hormone therapy completed the S-PFS-R, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Fatigue (POMS-F) and Vigor subscales (POMS-V), and bilateral force handgrip testing. Data analysis included test-retest reliability, construct validity, criterion-related validity, and exploratory factor analyses. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (r > 0.86), and all subscales showed moderate to high construct validity estimates [corrected item-subscale correlations (Pearson r = ≥ 0.65)]. The exploratory factor analysis revealed four dimensions with 75.5% of the common variance explained. The S-PFS-R total score positively correlated with the POMS-F subscale (r = 0.50-0.78) and negatively with the POMS-V subscale (r = -0.13 to -0.44) confirming criterion-related validity. Negative correlations among force handgrip testing, subscales, and total scores were weak (r = -0.26 to -0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of PFS-R shows satisfactory psychometric properties in a sample of breast cancer survivors. This is the first study to translate the PFS-R into Spanish and further testing is warranted.
Authors: Joanne E Mortimer; Andrea M Barsevick; Charles L Bennett; Ann M Berger; Charles Cleeland; Shannon R DeVader; Carmen Escalante; Jeffrey Gilreath; Arti Hurria; Tito R Mendoza; Hope S Rugo Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: P M Meek; L M Nail; A Barsevick; A L Schwartz; S Stephen; K Whitmer; S L Beck; L S Jones; B L Walker Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2000 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Pieter C Dagnelie; Madelon C G Pijls-Johannesma; Anouk Pijpe; Brigit J E Boumans; Arno T P Skrabanja; Philippe Lambin; Gertrudis I J M Kempen Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Annalisa Giacalone; Jerry Polesel; Angela De Paoli; Anna Maria Colussi; Ivana Sartor; Renato Talamini; Umberto Tirelli Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Brenda L Den Oudsten; Guus L Van Heck; Alida F W Van der Steeg; Jan A Roukema; Jolanda De Vries Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Eva Baró; Joan Carulla; Javier Cassinello; Ramón Colomer; Jesús García Mata; Pere Gascón; Jose Antonio Gasquet; Cesar A Rodríguez; Vicente Valentín Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Francisco Álvarez-Salvago; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Manuel Arroyo-Morales; Mayra Cruz-Fernández; Mario Lozano-Lozano; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anna Berardi; Giulia Graziosi; Gina Ferrazzano; Laura Casagrande Conti; Maria Grazia Grasso; Marco Tramontano; Antonella Conte; Giovanni Galeoto Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Francisco Álvarez-Salvago; Ana Lara-Ramos; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva; Maryna Mazheika; Antonio Mundo-López; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Carolina Fernández-Lao; Manuel Arroyo-Morales; Olga Ocón-Hernández; Francisco Artacho-Cordón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vitor A Marques; João B Ferreira-Junior; Thiago V Lemos; Rafael F Moraes; José Roberto de S Junior; Rafael R Alves; Maria S Silva; Ruffo de Freitas-Junior; Carlos A Vieira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ángela González-Santos; Maria Lopez-Garzon; Carmen Sánchez-Salado; Paula Postigo-Martin; Mario Lozano-Lozano; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Carolina Fernández-Lao; Eduardo Castro-Martín; Tania Gallart-Aragón; Marta Legerén-Álvarez; Rocío Gil-Gutiérrez; Lydia Martín-Martín Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Bella Pajares; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; Emilio Alba; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 4.614