Literature DB >> 23692520

Does an Acute Surgical Model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis?

Stephen F Brockman1, Steel Scott, Glenn D Guest, Douglas A Stupart, Shannon Ryan, David A K Watters.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The clinical outcomes from suspected appendicitis depend on balancing the rate of negative appendicectomy (NA) with perforated appendicitis (PA). An Acute Surgical Model (ASM) was introduced at Geelong Hospital (GH) in 2011 involving a dedicated emergency general surgery theatre list every business day giving greater access to theatre for general surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the ASM at GH on the management of appendicitis, in particular the NA and PA rates.
METHODS: Data for 357 patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy was collected prospectively over 1 year (2011) and compared with a historical control group of 351 patients (2010). The data was analysed for patient demographics, preoperative diagnostic radiology and outcomes including NA and PA rates and complications. The negative appendicectomy rates were compared with contemporary studies.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in rates of negative appendicectomy 21% (ASM; 73/357) versus 21% (Control; 73/351) P = 0.98, or perforated appendicitis 17% (ASM; 61/357) versus 13% (Control; 47/351) P = 0.18. The introduction of the ASM corresponded to a significantly lower proportion of emergency appendicectomies overnight (4% [16/357] versus 12% [44/351] P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the use of preoperative diagnostic radiology or complications. Matched contemporary studies had a NA rate of 26%.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of the ASM at GH has not significantly altered the rate of NA or PA. The NA rate at GH is comparable to other published UK and Australian series.
© 2013 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute Surgical Model; appendectomy; emergency surgery; negative appendicectomy; perforated appendicitis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692520     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  12 in total

1.  Appendicectomies performed >48 hours after admission to a dedicated acute general surgical unit.

Authors:  B March; D Gillies; J Gani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Impact of acute care surgery on timeliness of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature

Authors:  Ashley Vergis; Jennifer Metcalfe; Shannon E. Stogryn; Kathleen Clouston; Krista Hardy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Emergency Management of Gallbladder Disease: Are Acute Surgical Units the New Gold Standard?

Authors:  Rose Shakerian; Anita Skandarajah; Alexandra Gorelik; Benjamin Thomson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Risk factors for the development of complicated appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Amir Eslami Shahr Babaki; Saeed Shoar; Hossein Mahmoodzadeh; Shirzad Nasiri; Zhamak Khorgami
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 5.  A systematic review of dedicated models of care for emergency urological patients.

Authors:  Ned Kinnear; Matheesha Herath; Dylan Barnett; Derek Hennessey; Christopher Dobbins; Tarik Sammour; James Moore
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 6.  The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional "on call" model: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Negative appendicectomy rates as a quality measure in a regional surgical unit: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Noel E Donlon; Michael E Kelly; Andrew Sheppard; Maria Davern; Tim S Nugent; Patrick A Boland; Kevin Corless; Waqar Khan; Iqbal Khan; Ronan Waldron; Kevin Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Arianna Birindelli; Micheal D Kelly; Fausto Catena; Dieter G Weber; Massimo Sartelli; Michael Sugrue; Mark De Moya; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Aneel Bhangu; Ferdinando Agresta; Ernest E Moore; Kjetil Soreide; Ewen Griffiths; Steve De Castro; Jeffry Kashuk; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppaniemi; Luca Ansaloni; Manne Andersson; Federico Coccolini; Raul Coimbra; Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Walter Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fred Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; David Costa; Ronald V Maier; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Roberto Cirocchi; Valeria Tonini; Alice Piccinini; Gregorio Tugnoli; Elio Jovine; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Biondi; Thomas Scalea; Philip Stahel; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Inflammatory parameters as predictive factors for complicated appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ana Matos Ribeiro; Inês Romero; Carlos Costa Pereira; Filomena Soares; Álvaro Gonçalves; Susana Costa; João Barros da Silva
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-19

10.  Appendiceal Crohn's disease: a rare differential of right iliac fossa pain.

Authors:  Adam James Crellin; Omar Musbahi; Natasha Onwu; Sandeep Singh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.