Literature DB >> 23692262

Clinical efficacy and safety of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole.

Erdal Safak1, Dietmar Schmitz, Thomas Konorza, Christian Wende, Jose Olague De Ros, Alexander Schirdewan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept of a single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), with a floating dipole, has been proven safe and functional. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The studied active-fixation, steroid-eluting lead (Linox(smart) S DX, BIOTRONIK SE & Co KG, Berlin, Germany) is one French thinner than its predecessor and coated with lubricious SilGlide to improve lead handling. A dedicated ICD device has a self-adaptive atrial input stage including a fourfold amplifier. The amplification, filtering, and adapted atrial input stage are located in the Lumax 540 VR-T DX (BIOTRONIK). The Linox(smart) S DX ICD lead delivers only the signal. The lead was evaluated during implantation; at predischarge; and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up examinations. The primary endpoint (efficacy) was the rate of appropriate atrial sensing tests. The secondary endpoint (safety) was freedom from lead-related invasive reinterventions. Both safety and efficacy were expected to be significantly higher than 90%. The study enrolled 116 patients at 25 clinical sites. Skin-to-skin operation time was 52.4 ± 26.2 minutes. The investigators graded lead insertion as "easy" in 87% of patients. Mean P-wave amplitudes (preamplified) varied from 5.0 to 6.1 mV in different body positions. Both primary and secondary endpoints were met, as 93.8% (364/388; P = 0.005) of specific sensing tests indicated appropriate atrial sensing, and 94.8% (110/116; P = 0.048) of patients were free from reinterventions (lead dislodgement). Analysis of arrhythmia episodes stored in ICDs and elective 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram tests raised no concerns about lead functionality.
CONCLUSION: The studied ICD lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole met the predefined safety expectation and demonstrated appropriate atrial sensing performance. ©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial sensing; complications; defibrillation lead; floating atrial sensing dipole; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; lead handling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692262     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  The Dx-AF study: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing VDD-ICD to VVI-ICD in detecting sub-clinical atrial fibrillation in defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Shurrab; Amir Janmohamed; Jean-François Sarrazin; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Marcio Sturmer; Randall Williams; Satish Toal; Chris Lane; Kevin E Thorpe; Jeff S Healey; Eugene Crystal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  "Two for the Price of One": A Single-Lead Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System with a Floating Atrial Dipole.

Authors:  Nicole E Worden; Musab Alqasrawi; Siva M Krothapalli; Alexander Mazur
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-04-30

3.  Atrial electrogram quality in single-pass defibrillator leads with floating atrial bipole in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Christian Sticherling; Dirk Müller; Beat A Schaer; Silke Krüger; Christof Kolb
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  The VDD ICD lead: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Suneet Mittal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation detection with a floating atrial sensing dipole in single lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems: Results of the SENSE trial.

Authors:  George Thomas; Daniel Y Choi; Harish Doppalapudi; Mark Richards; Sei Iwai; Emile G Daoud; Mahmoud Houmsse; Arvindh N Kanagasundram; Sumeet K Mainigi; Steven A Lubitz; Jim W Cheung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-05

6.  Real-world performance of the atrial fibrillation monitor in patients with a subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Sarah W E Baalman; Suneet Mittal; Lucas V A Boersma; Dave Perschbacher; Amy J Brisben; Deepa Mahajan; Joris R de Groot; Reinoud E Knops
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 7.  The utilization of atrial sensing dipole in single lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator for detection of new-onset atrial high-rate episodes or subclinical atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuanming Pung; Daniel Zhihao Hong; Tzyy Yeou Ho; Xiayan Shen; Pei Ting Tan; Colin Yeo; Vern Hsen Tan
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 8.  ICD discrimination of SVT versus VT with 1:1 V-A conduction: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Rhanderson N Cardoso; Chris Healy; Juan Viles-Gonzalez; James O Coffey
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-02-12

9.  The efficacy of the LinoxSmart DX ICD lead from a single center experience.

Authors:  Ibrahim Marai; Anat Milman; Rafael Diamante; Osnat Gurevitz; David Barlev; Igor Lipchenka; Eyal Nof; Michael Glikson; Roy Beinart
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2019-12-17

10.  Cost Saving Potential of an Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients after ICD Implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Reinhold; Roberto Belke; Tino Hauser; Christian Grebmer; Carsten Lennerz; Verena Semmler; Christof Kolb
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.