Literature DB >> 23692214

Dynamic simulation and static matching for action prediction: evidence from body part priming.

Anne Springer1, Simone Brandstädter, Wolfgang Prinz.   

Abstract

Accurately predicting other people's actions may involve two processes: internal real-time simulation (dynamic updating) and matching recently perceived action images (static matching). Using a priming of body parts, this study aimed to differentiate the two processes. Specifically, participants played a motion-controlled video game with either their arms or legs. They then observed arm movements of a point-light actor, which were briefly occluded from view, followed by a static test pose. Participants judged whether this test pose depicted a coherent continuation of the previously seen action (i.e., "action prediction task"). Evidence of dynamic updating was obtained after compatible effector priming (i.e., arms), whereas incompatible effector priming (i.e., legs) indicated static matching. Together, the results support action prediction as engaging two distinct processes, dynamic simulation and static matching, and indicate that their relative contributions depend on contextual factors like compatibility of body parts involved in performed and observed action.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action prediction; Body part priming; Internal simulation; Point-light action

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692214     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  5 in total

1.  An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation.

Authors:  Desmond Mulligan; Keith R Lohse; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-29

2.  Critical Motor Involvement in Prediction of Human and Non-biological Motion Trajectories.

Authors:  Matthieu M de Wit; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Action simulation: time course and representational mechanisms.

Authors:  Anne Springer; Jim Parkinson; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

4.  One step ahead: The perceived kinematics of others' actions are biased toward expected goals.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Toby Nicholson; William A Simpson; Rob Ellis; Patric Bach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-11-23

5.  10-Month-Old Infants Are Sensitive to the Time Course of Perceived Actions: Eye-Tracking and EEG Evidence.

Authors:  Cathleen Bache; Anne Springer; Hannes Noack; Waltraud Stadler; Franziska Kopp; Ulman Lindenberger; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.