Literature DB >> 23691780

Plasma-free hemoglobin levels in advanced vs. conventional infant and pediatric extracorporeal life support circuits.

Amanda M Cornelius1, Jeffrey B Riley, Gregory J Schears, Harold M Burkhart.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a reliable method to support pediatric patients with reversible cardiorespiratory failure associated with congenital heart disease, respiratory insufficiency, or after cardiac surgery. In 2010, our institution adopted an infant/pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit that contains a magnetically levitated centrifugal pump, polymethylpentene oxygenator, and shorter tubing length (ECMO II circuit). Our prior circuit contained a nonocclusive roller pump, polypropylene oxygenator, venous compliance chamber, and hemoconcentrator (ECMO I circuit). A retrospective chart review comparing ECMO I and ECMO II daily plasma-free hemoglobin (PFH) values was conducted. We hypothesized that the PFH is similar between the two ECMO circuit groups. We reviewed medical records of children 3 years of age or younger weighing less than 13 kg who required ECLS between January 2008 and February 2012. PFH levels from 18 ECMO II patients were compared with levels in a retrospective group of an equal number of well-matched ECMO I circuit patients. There was no significant difference between ECMO I and ECMO II circuit groups regarding mean time on ECMO, age in days, and weight. There was also no significant difference in the group mean levels of PFH between ECMO I and ECMO II circuits. There was a significant increase in PFH with hours on ECMO (p < .01) within and between both circuit groups (p < .01) and a significantly greater increase in PFH with ECMO hours (p = .0091) in the ECMO I circuit group. Although there was no significant difference in average PFH with the change in ECMO II circuit technology, advancements such as the magnetically levitated blood pump and polymethylpentene gas exchange device has been associated with significantly fewer mechanical component change-outs (p = .0156) and less clots and fibrin build-up in the circuits (p = .0548).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23691780      PMCID: PMC4557459     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  10 in total

1.  Postoperative extracorporeal life support in pediatric cardiac surgery: recent results.

Authors:  Olivier Ghez; Horea Feier; Fabrice Ughetto; Alain Fraisse; Bernard Kreitmann; Dominique Metras
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass devices: trends in device use for cardiopulmonary bypass and postcardiotomy support.

Authors:  Robert C Groom
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Experience with extracorporeal life support in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Shu-Chien Huang; En-Ting Wu; Yih-Sharng Chen; Chung-I Chang; Ing-Sh Chiu; Nai-Hsin Chi; Mei-Hwan Wu; Shoei-Shen Wang; Fang-Yue Lin; Wen-Je Ko
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  Update on safety equipment for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuits.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Riley; Phillip D Scott; Gregory J Schears
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-08-31

5.  Comparison of perfusion quality in hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators for neonatal extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Jonathan Talor; Stella Yee; Alan Rider; Allen R Kunselman; Yulong Guan; Akif Undar
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.094

6.  Hemolysis during cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-control comparison of roller pumps and centrifugal pumps in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Jonathan Byrnes; Wes McKamie; Christopher Swearingen; Parthak Prodhan; Adnan Bhutta; Robert Jaquiss; Michiaki Imamura; Richard Fiser
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Extracorporeal life support outcome for 128 pediatric patients with respiratory failure.

Authors:  F Swaniker; S Kolla; F Moler; J Custer; R Grams; R Barlett; R Hirschl
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Enhanced hemolysis in pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Betrus; Robert Remenapp; John Charpie; Timothy Kudelka; Patrick Brophy; William E Smoyer; Jen-Jar Lin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.520

9.  Hemolysis during long-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  R H Steinhorn; B Isham-Schopf; C Smith; T P Green
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Significance of hemolysis on extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery in children.

Authors:  Rasheed Gbadegesin; Shuang Zhao; John Charpie; Patrick D Brophy; William E Smoyer; Jen-Jar Lin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.714

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro models for thrombogenicity testing of blood-recirculating medical devices.

Authors:  Deepika N Sarode; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Using Daily Plasma-Free Hemoglobin Levels for Diagnosis of Critical Pump Thrombus in Patients Undergoing ECMO or VAD Support.

Authors:  James R Neal; Eduard Quintana; Roxann B Pike; James D Hoyer; Lyle D Joyce; Gregory Schears
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2015-06

3.  High cut-off membrane for in-vivo dialysis of free plasma hemoglobin in a patient with massive hemolysis.

Authors:  David Cucchiari; Enric Reverter; Miquel Blasco; Alicia Molina-Andujar; Adriá Carpio; Miquel Sanz; Angels Escorsell; Javier Fernández; Esteban Poch
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.