| Literature DB >> 23691478 |
Mei-Ying Weng1, Lin Li, Shun-Jia Hong, Shu-Ying Feng.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This work aims to investigate the expression pattern and clinicopathologic significance of centromere protein H (CENP-H) in uterine cervical cancer (UCC).Entities:
Keywords: CENP-H; immunohistochemistry; prognosis; tumor staging; uterine cervical cancer; uterine cervix
Year: 2012 PMID: 23691478 PMCID: PMC3643666 DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2012.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Biol Med ISSN: 2095-3941 Impact factor: 4.248
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining for CENP-H expression in uterine cervical cancer and paraneoplastic tissues. A: Absence of CENP-H expression in paraneoplastic tissues; B: Low expression of CENP-H in uterine cervical cancer; C: High expression of CENP-H in uterine cervical cancer (200 ×).
Relationship between CENP-H expression and clinicopathologic features of UCC.
| Characteristics | Cases | CENP-H | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression (%) | High expression (%) | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| <60 | 29 | 11 (37.9) | 18 (62.1) | 0.906 |
| ≥60 | 33 | 13 (39.4) | 20 (60.6) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||
| ≥4 | 24 | 6 (25.0) | 18 (75.0) | 0.001 |
| <4 | 38 | 18 (47.4) | 20 (52.6) | |
| Stage | ||||
| I/II | 26 | 14 (53.8) | 12 (46.2) | 0.038 |
| III/IV | 36 | 10 (27.8) | 26 (72.2) | |
| T-staging | ||||
| T1/T2 | 23 | 11 (47.8) | 12 (52.2) | 0.258 |
| T3/T4 | 39 | 13 (33.3) | 26 (66.7) | |
| Nodal metastasis | ||||
| Existent | 27 | 11 (40.7) | 16 (59.3) | 0.773 |
| Nonexistent | 35 | 13 (37.1) | 22 (62.9) | |
Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis of the prognostic factors of UCC patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Regression coefficient (SE) | Coefficient of relative risk | 95% CI | ||||
| Stage | |||||||
| I/II | 26 | 0.003 | 1.104 (0.376%) | 0.001 | 2.135 | 1.271-3.586 | |
| III/IV | 36 | ||||||
| CENP-H | |||||||
| High expression | 38 | 0.001 | 0.917 (0.358%) | 0.002 | 1.490 | 1.113–1.995 | |
| Low expression | 24 | ||||||
| T-staging | |||||||
| T1/T2 | 23 | 0.004 | 0.697 (0.114%) | 0.007 | 1.280 | 0.971-1.428 | |
| T3/T4 | 39 | ||||||
| Node metastasis | |||||||
| Positive | 27 | 0.000 | 1.677 (0.370%) | 0.004 | 2.892 | 1.326-5.278 | |
| Negative | 35 | ||||||
Figure 2Comparison of the survival rates between the group with high CENP-H expression and that with low CENP-H expression in the 62 UCC patients.