| Literature DB >> 29088763 |
Haiyan Wang1,2, Weilong Liu2, Lei Liu2, Chi Wu1,2, Weigang Wu3, Juan Zheng2, Mingxia Zhang2, Xinchun Chen2, Boping Zhou3, Zhiliang Gao1,4, Jian Huang2,3,5.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the high-incidence malignant tumors with very poor prognosis. Identification of potential oncogenes is critical to discovering novel therapeutic targets for many cancers, including HCC. In our previous studies, using microarray technology, we conformed that CENP-K was overexpressed in HCCs. However, whether the overexpression of CENP-K contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we found that CENP-K was significantly up-regulated in 60% (63 of 105) of HCC specimens at the mRNA level compared to adjacent non-cancerous liver specimens, as determined by RT-qPCR. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed similar results at the protein level. Interestingly, we found that the DNA methylation status of the CENP-K promoter was significantly reduced in HCC specimens with increased CENP-K expression. In addition, CENP-K mRNA expression level was positively correlated with the level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥ 400 ng/ml) and tumor size (≥ 3 cm) (p < 0.05). CENP-K overexpression promoted proliferation and migration in SMMC7721 and Focus cells. In contrast, knock down of CENP-K significantly inhibited the growth of MHCC-LM3 and QGY7703 cells. Furthermore, we found that overexpression of CENP-K stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of the AKT and MDM2 proteins, but inhibited tyrosine phosphorylation of the TP53 protein. Our data suggest that the up-regulation of CENP-K, a potential oncotarget gene, may be modulated by epigenetic events and can contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: centromere protein K; hepatocarcinogenesis; hepatocellular carcinoma; methylation; up-regulation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29088763 PMCID: PMC5650318 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The expression pattern of CENP-K mRNA and protein in HCC specimens
(A) Representative semi-quantative RT-PCR results of CENP-K in 20 matched HCC (C) and their corresponding adjacent non-cancerous livers (N); (B) CENP-K expression fold of HCC tissue versus the corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissues in 105 pairs of samples; (C) Representative immunohistochemical staining of a pair of HCC specimens and its corresponding non-tumor tissue, as determined using an anti-CENP-K antibody. The nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. (D) CENP-K mRNA levels comparision between tumors with the size larger or smaller than 3 cm; (E) The distribution of CENP-K and AFP mRNA levels in 105 HCC specimens; (F) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of CENP-K in 5 fetal liver tissues and 8 normal liver tissues.
The expression of CENPK versus clinical features
| Clinicopathological | Number of patients | Upregulation* | no up-regulation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 11 | 5 | 0.51 | > 0.05 | |
| 81 | 48 | 33 | |||
| 81 | 49 | 32 | 0.01 | > 0.05 | |
| 17 | 11 | 6 | |||
| HBV | |||||
| HBV (+) | 61 | 54 | 29 | 2.50 | > 0.05 |
| HBV (−) | 6 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Tumor size | |||||
| 81 | 48 | 33 | 0.01 | < 0.05 | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | |||
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.19 | > 0.05 | |
| 102 | 64 | 38 | |||
| AFP | |||||
| ≥ 400 ng/ml | 36 | 26 | 10 | 4.38 | < 0.05 |
| < 400 ng/ml | 41 | 20 | 21 | ||
*:up regulation of CENP-K was designed as ≥ 2(HCC/non-HCC).
Figure 2The effect of CENP-K on the growth and colony formation of HCC cells
(A) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of CENP-K in 19 HCC cells; (B and C) CENP-K was significantly overexpressed in SMMC7721 and Focus. Blank vector pCMV was used as a negtive control. The growth curves were determined by the CCK-8 assay; (D and E) CENP-K was knockdown in MHCC-LM3 and QGY7703. SiRNA-NC was used as a negtive control. The growth curves were determined by the CCK-8 assay; (F and G) CENP-K was significantly overexpressed in SMMC7721 and Focus. Blank vector pCMV was used as a negtive control. After transfection for 24 hours, the cells were scraped and plated on dishes and cultured in G418 for 2 weeks. The representation dishes showed that CENP-K promoted the colony formation. The histogram showed that the colony formation was promoted by CENP-K, compared with the vector-only control. All the expriments were repeated at least three times and the spots represent the average values, with standard deviations (SDs) included for each mean value.
Figure 3The effect of CENP-K overexpression on HCC cell migration and tumorigenicity
(A and B) Blank vector pCMV was transfected into SMMC7721 (A) and Focus (B) cells as the negtive controls. The number of migrated cells is represented by the mean values per field (from at least 5 fields) from three independent experiments; (C) Photograph of xenografts disected from nude mice which were injected subcetaneously.
Figure 4The DNA methylation status of the CENP-K promoter in HCC
The results from the bisulfite sequencing analysis of CENP-K promoter CpG methylation in four pairs of HCC and non-HCC specimens. Each box stands for a CpG dinucleotide within the CpG island in the promoter. Black spot suggests methylation cytosine while blank box indicates unmethylated cytosine.
Figure 5CENP-K modulates the phosphorylation of the AKT/TP53 signaling pathway
The overexpression of CENP-K enhanced the phosphorylation of AKT and MDM2, and inhibited the phosphorylation of TP53 in Focus cell line. β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantification of phosphorylation and non-phosphorylation levels were indicated by the numbers which were performed by normalizing the concentrations to the β-actin control.