Mice cannot be used to evaluate HIV-1 therapeutics and vaccines because they are not infectible by HIV-1 due to structural differences between several human and mouse proteins required for HIV-1 entry and replication including CD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1. We overcame this limitation by constructing mice with CD4 enhancer/promoter-regulated human CD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 genes integrated as tightly linked transgenes (hCD4/R5/cT1 mice) promoting their efficient co-transmission and enabling the murine CD4-expressing cells to support HIV-1 entry and Tat-mediated LTR transcription. All of the hCD4/R5/cT1 mice developed disseminated infection of tissues that included the spleen, small intestine, lymph nodes and lungs after intravenous injection with an HIV-1 infectious molecular clone (HIV-IMC) expressing Renilla reniformis luciferase (LucR). Furthermore, localized infection of cervical-vaginal mucosal leukocytes developed after intravaginal inoculation of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice with the LucR-expressing HIV-IMC. hCD4/R5/cT1 mice reproducibly developed in vivo infection after inoculation with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC which could be bioluminescently quantified and visualized with a high sensitivity and specificity which enabled them to be used to evaluate the efficacy of HIV-1 therapeutics. Treatment with highly active anti-retroviral therapy or one dose of VRC01, a broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibody, almost completed inhibited acute systemic HIV-1 infection of the hCD4/R5/cT1 mice. hCD4/R5/cT1 mice could also be used to evaluate the capacity of therapies delivered by gene therapy to inhibit in vivo HIV infection. VRC01 secreted in vivo by primary B cells transduced with a VRC01-encoding lentivirus transplanted into hCD4/R5/cT1 mice markedly inhibited infection after intravenous challenge with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC. The reproducible infection of CD4/R5/cT1 mice with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC after intravenous or mucosal inoculation combined with the availability of LucR-expressing HIV-IMC expressing transmitted/founder and clade A/E and C Envs will provide researchers with a highly accessible pre-clinical in vivo HIV-1-infection model to study HIV-1 acquisition, treatment, and prevention.
Mice cannot be used to evaluate HIV-1 therapeutics and vaccines because they are not infectible by HIV-1 due to structural differences between several human and mouse proteins required for HIV-1 entry and replication including CD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1. We overcame this limitation by constructing mice with CD4 enhancer/promoter-regulated humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 genes integrated as tightly linked transgenes (hCD4/R5/cT1mice) promoting their efficient co-transmission and enabling the murineCD4-expressing cells to support HIV-1 entry and Tat-mediated LTR transcription. All of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice developed disseminated infection of tissues that included the spleen, small intestine, lymph nodes and lungs after intravenous injection with an HIV-1 infectious molecular clone (HIV-IMC) expressing Renilla reniformis luciferase (LucR). Furthermore, localized infection of cervical-vaginal mucosal leukocytes developed after intravaginal inoculation of hCD4/R5/cT1mice with the LucR-expressing HIV-IMC. hCD4/R5/cT1mice reproducibly developed in vivo infection after inoculation with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC which could be bioluminescently quantified and visualized with a high sensitivity and specificity which enabled them to be used to evaluate the efficacy of HIV-1 therapeutics. Treatment with highly active anti-retroviral therapy or one dose of VRC01, a broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibody, almost completed inhibited acute systemic HIV-1 infection of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice. hCD4/R5/cT1mice could also be used to evaluate the capacity of therapies delivered by gene therapy to inhibit in vivo HIV infection. VRC01 secreted in vivo by primary B cells transduced with a VRC01-encoding lentivirus transplanted into hCD4/R5/cT1mice markedly inhibited infection after intravenous challenge with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC. The reproducible infection of CD4/R5/cT1mice with LucR-expressing HIV-IMC after intravenous or mucosal inoculation combined with the availability of LucR-expressing HIV-IMC expressing transmitted/founder and clade A/E and C Envs will provide researchers with a highly accessible pre-clinical in vivo HIV-1-infection model to study HIV-1 acquisition, treatment, and prevention.
Two major restrictions prevent HIV-1 from infecting mouse cells. First, HIV-1 is unable to enter mouse cells because its envelope glycoprotein, gp120, does not engage mouseCD4 and CCR5 [1]. Second, HIV-1 Tat does not function in mouse cells because it does not bind to mousecyclin T1 and consequently cannot activate HIV-1 transcription by recruiting the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) complex to the HIV-1 TAR RNA target element [2]–[4]. To circumvent this restriction, humanized mouse models have been developed and used for HIV-1 investigation such as severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice transplanted with human peripheral blood lymphocytes [5] or implanted with human fetal thymus and liver [6], Rag2−/−γc
−/− mice injected with human hematopoietic stem cells (hHSC) [7], [8], NOD/SCID/IL2Rγnull mice injected with hHSC [9] or NOD/SCIDmice transplanted with human fetal thymus and liver tissue and injected with syngeneic hHSC [10]. However, these humanized mouse models cannot take advantage of the wide array of available transgenic and gene-deleted mouse lines to apply genetic approaches to investigate HIV-1 transmission. Their construction is also technically challenging, time-consuming and expensive. They do not generate potent HIV-1-specific human immune responses which limit their usefulness for evaluating HIV-1 vaccines and HIV-1 immunopathogenesis.Transgenic mice have been generated to overcome these restrictions by crossing transgenic lines carrying CD4 promoter/enhancer cassettes that direct expression of humanCD4, CCR5 or cyclin T1 transgenes to CD4 T lymphocytes, macrophages, and monocytes. However, productive in vivo infection in these transgenic mice has not been reported [11]. Two limitations have prevented their use for in vivo HIV-1 infection studies. First, the time-consuming and inefficient process of breeding three separate lines transgenic for humanCD4, CCR5 or cyclinT1 impedes the generation of sufficient mice for experiments because only one of eight progeny mice are predicted to carry all three alleles after a heterozygous cross. Second, clearly demonstrating productive in vivo HIV-1 infection is complicated by the absence of a highly sensitive and specific method of monitoring HIV-1 replication in the context of the reduced capacity of mice to support efficient HIV-1 replication. We overcame both of these limitations by generating an improved mouse model carrying the humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 transgenes transmitted as a single allele that is co-inherited across multiple generations with targeted expression to CD4+ T cells and macrophages (hCD4/R5/cT1mice) and using a recently developed replication-competent molecular HIV-1 clone that expresses Renilla reniformis luciferase (LucR) as the infectious inoculum [12].
Materials and Methods
Construction of Transgenic Mice
A vector expressing humanCD4 and CCR5 as a single transcript with the genes linked by a self-cleaving picornovirus-derived 2A peptide sequence was constructed using the approach we previously described [13]. Full-length humanCD4 and CCR5 genes were cloned by PCR amplification using the pT4B and pCCR-5 vectors (obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, from Dr. Richard Axel and Dr. Nathaniel Landau, respectively) [1], [14], [15] as templates for the humanCD4 and CCR5 genes, respectively, and were combined into a single sequence linked by the 2A sequence (CD4-2A-CCR5) using a modification of a previously described approach [13]. Briefly, as shown in Figure 1A, the humanCD4 gene was amplified by PCR with a primers specific for the 5′ leader sequence of the CD4 with an added Sal I restriction site (primer 1) and for the 2A sequence followed by the terminal CD4 region (primer 2). The humanCCR5 gene was amplified by PCR with primers specific for the full 2A sequence followed by the CCR5 leader sequence (primer 3) and the terminal sequence of the CCR5 constant region and an added Sal I restriction site (primer 4). The two PCR products were mixed and the humanCD4-2A-CCR5 sequence was generated by PCR amplification with primers 1 and 4 and cloned into the Sal I restriction site of the CD4 promoter/enhancer cassette-regulated vector previously used to construct the CD4 promoter/enhancer-regulated humancyclin T1 vector [16]. TransgenichCD4/R5/cT1mouse founders were generated by microinjecting the humanCD4-2A-CCR5 and humancyclinT1 constructs together into fertilized oocytes from C57BL/6 mice after digestion and excision of the inserts with NotI. Founders carrying the humanCD4, CCR5, and cyclin T1 transgenes were identified by PCR analysis from tail DNA samples using human-specific internal primer sets for CD4 (5′ primer: GTGGAGTTCAAAATAGACATCGTG, 3′ primer: CAGCACCCACACCGCCTTCTCCCGCTT), CCR5 (5′ primer: CACCTGCAGCTCTCATTTTCC, 3′ primer: TTGTAGGGAGCCCAGAAGAG) and cyclin T1 (5′ primer: TCCCAACTTCCAGTTGGTACT, 3′ primer: TCCACCAGACCGAGGATTCAG). Founders carrying all three transgenes were mated with C57BL/6 mice, and transgene transmission to their progeny was determined by PCR amplification of tail DNA using the humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 specific primers described above. Expression of humanCD4 and CCR5 and expression of humancyclin T1 was determined by flow cytometry and immunoblot analysis, respectively, as described below.
Figure 1
Construction of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and evaluation of transgene expression.
(A) Schematic representation of the human CD4/CCR5 and cyclin T1 transgene constructs. E4/P4, murine CD4 enhancer/promoter; N, Xb, Xh, Cl, Sc, B, and S, restriction enzyme sites for NotI, XbaI, Xho1, ClaI, SacI, BamHI and SalI, respectively; SVpA, SV40 polyadenylation signal. (B) Transmission of the human CD4 and CCR5 or cyclin T1 in the transgenic mouse founders was determined by PCR. DNA was extracted from the tails of the indicated transgenic founder mice and integrated human CD4, CCR5 or cyclin T1 genes were detected by PCR amplification with primer pairs specific for human CD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1, respectively. (C) Expression of the human cyclin T1 transgene in the spleens and thymuses of founder 479 progeny mice was detected by immunoblotting with a polyclonal antibody specific for human cyclin T1. Lysate from spleens from a JRCSF/hu-CycT1 mouse and a wild-type littermate mice were run as positive and negative controls respectively and equivalent protein loading was demonstrated by immunoblotting with a polyclonal antibody specific for mouse actin.
Construction of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and evaluation of transgene expression.
(A) Schematic representation of the humanCD4/CCR5 and cyclin T1 transgene constructs. E4/P4, murineCD4 enhancer/promoter; N, Xb, Xh, Cl, Sc, B, and S, restriction enzyme sites for NotI, XbaI, Xho1, ClaI, SacI, BamHI and SalI, respectively; SVpA, SV40 polyadenylation signal. (B) Transmission of the humanCD4 and CCR5 or cyclin T1 in the transgenicmouse founders was determined by PCR. DNA was extracted from the tails of the indicated transgenic founder mice and integrated humanCD4, CCR5 or cyclin T1 genes were detected by PCR amplification with primer pairs specific for humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1, respectively. (C) Expression of the humancyclin T1 transgene in the spleens and thymuses of founder 479 progeny mice was detected by immunoblotting with a polyclonal antibody specific for humancyclin T1. Lysate from spleens from a JRCSF/hu-CycT1mouse and a wild-type littermate mice were run as positive and negative controls respectively and equivalent protein loading was demonstrated by immunoblotting with a polyclonal antibody specific for mouse actin.
Flow Cytometric Analysis
Bone marrow cells, thymocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and splenocytes isolated from the mice stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-humanCCR5, Cy7-allophycocyanin (Cy7-APC)-labeled anti-humanCD4 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and either FITC-labeled anti-mouseCD4 or FITC-labeled anti-mouseCD8 were analyzed for expression of the surface molecules using an LSRII (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR). For analysis of the phenotype of HIV-1-infected cells, we utilized NLENG1i-Bal.ecto or NLENG1i-CH077.ecto [17]. These replication-competent, nef-expressing HIV-1 infectious molecular clones were derived from the gfp-expressing NLENG1-IRES clone [18]–[20] modified to encode either the HIV-1 BaL env sequence or the CH077 env sequence, which was derived from a transmitted/founder HIV-1 isolate [12]. HIV-1-infected cells were identified by their expression of GFP and phenotypically characterized by staining with PE-labeled anti-mouseCD4 or APC-labeled anti-mouseCD11c.
Immunoblot Detection of Human Cyclin T1
Humancyclin T1 was detected in whole cell extracts of mouse splenocytes or thymocytes by immunoblot as described [16]. Briefly, cellular lysate (25 µg) was resolved on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Water & Process Tech, Treveose, PA). The membrane was blocked for 1 hour with PBS containing 5% milk powder, then sequentially incubated either with goat anti-humancyclin T1 antibody or with goat anti-mouse actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA) and then with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-goat IgG antibody. Bound antibody was detected with the Western Lightning chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare, Boston, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Generation of HIV-1 Infectious Molecular Clones
Virus stocks from an HIV-1 infectious molecular clone encoding the Renilla reniformis luciferase gene was generated by transient transfection of 293T cells with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto plasmid DNA which encodes an HIV-1 provirus and a full-length Env protein in which the ectodomain sequence is derived from the BaL env, as previously described [12], [21]. The infectious titer of the NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto virus (5–10×107 infectious units (IU)/ml) was determined by limiting dilution infection of TZM-bl cells as described [12]. Virus stocks for the infectious molecular clones NLENG1i-BaL.ecto and NLENG1i-CHO77.ecto expressing GFP (see above) were derived using the same transfection and titration methods.
Isolation of Mouse Myeloid-lineage Cells and CD4+ T Lymphocytes
Mouse femurs were lavaged with PBS containing 3% BSA to extract bone marrow cells which were dispersed by vigorous pipetting, washed, and cultured in complete media [RPMI media containing 10% FCS and 2-mercaptoethanol (50 µM)]. After 5 days of culture, nonadherent cells were gently rinsed away, fresh complete media chilled to 4°C was added, and adherent cells were harvested by scraping. These myeloid-lineage cells were greater than 95% viable by trypan blue exclusion and greater than 80% of the cells expressed the monocyte marker, CD11b, as detected by flow cytometric analysis. CD4+ T lymphocytes were purified from mouse splenocytes using the AutoMACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. After lysis of red blood cells in the spleen by incubation in NH4Cl2 buffer (150 mM), mononuclear cells were washed twice with PBS, incubated with MACS MicroBeads coupled to anti-mouseCD4 antibody and passed through a positive selection autoMACS separation column using the AutoMACS automated bench-top magnetic cell sorter. HumanCD4+ T cells or monocytes were isolated from PBMCs obtained from a HIV-1-naïve donor by immunomagnetic sorting using MACS MicroBeads coupled to anti-humanCD4 or anti-humanCD11b antibody, respectively, and passage through the AutoMACS automated bench-top magnetic cell sorter as described above. The purity of the sorted cells was determined by flow cytometry and was greater than 80%.
HIV-1 Infection
Mouse myeloid-lineage cells or human macrophages isolated as described above were plated in 48 well plates (105 cells/well) with complete media containing mouse or humanGM-CSF (20 ng/ml). Highly purified mouse or humanCD4+ T cells, isolated as described above, were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 (3 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml) for 3 days and plated in 48 well plates (105 cells/well) with complete media and added IL-2 (100 units/ml). The cells were spinfected in triplicate or duplicate cultures with NL-LucR-T2A-BaL.ecto by centrifugation in the presence of polybrene (4 µg/ml) at 2,500 RPM for 60 minutes. The virus was then washed away and the cells were placed in culture. At the indicated time, cells were harvested, and LucR activity was measured in duplicate using the Renilla Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI). For in vivo infection, hCD4/R5/cT1mice were intrasplenicly or intravenously injected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto (1- to 2×107 IU) and evaluated for HIV-1 infection at the indicated times by quantification of LucR activity in splenic lysates as described above. Infection of small intestine and lung was determined by quantifying LucR activity in small intestine segments and lung lysates after enzymatic digestion of the tissue with collagenase D (60 µg/ml) and DNaseI (10 U/ml) as described [22], [23]. Mice were vaginally infected by atraumatically introducing HIV-1-LucR (50 µl containing ∼105 IU) into the vagina 5 days after subcutaneous injection with Depo-Provera (2.5 mg). One week later, vaginal mucosal leukocytes were isolated as described [24], [25] and LucR activity in the cellular lysate was determined. For bioluminescent imaging, the bioluminescence substrate RediJect Coelenterazine h (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA) was directly injected (5 µg) into the spleens prior to ex vivo imaging by the IVIS Spectrum imager (Caliper LifeSciences) using the Wizard bioluminescent selection tool for automatic wavelength and exposure detection. The bioluminescent and gray-scale images were overlaid using the LivingImage 4.0 software package and a pseudocolor image was created representing bioluminescence intensity and quantified as photon counts/second.
Treatment of Mice with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) or VRCO1
Mice were treated with HAART by the addition of azidothymidine, lamivudine and indinavir (45 µg/kg/day) to their drinking water as described [26]. Plasma viral load in the mice was determined with a highly sensitive internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase-initiated quantitative PCR assay that quantifies HIV-1 RNA concentrations down to 1 copy/ml of plasma using gag-specific primers and an internal probe containing a reporter 6-carboxyfluorescein group (FAM) and a 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine group quencher (Q) as described [27]. VRC01 antibody used for treatment was generated by transfection of CHO cells with a construct expressing VRC01 [28], [29] (provided by Dr. John Mascola, VRC/NIAID/NIH) and passage of the culture supernatant through a protein G column.
Molecular Engineering of B Cells to Express VRC01 Antibody
We used an approach we previously described [30] to utilize PCR to clone the mRNA sequences encoding the light and heavy chain genes for the secreted VRC01 antibody [28] as a single construct linked by a “self-cleaving” P2A peptide [31] and insert it into the human phosphoglycerate kinase (hPGK) promoter-regulated hPGK.ires.emcvwt.eGFP.Wpre lentiviral transfer vector [32]. Pseudotyped HIV-based third-generation lentivirus was generated by calcium phosphate-mediated co-transfection of 293T cells with the VRC01 or control lentiviral transfer vector and vectors expressing packaging proteins, the rev gene and the VSV-g envelope gene as described [33]. Highly purified mouse B cells isolated from hCD4/R5/cT1mouse spleens by immunomagnetic sorting using MACS MicroBeads coupled to anti-mouseCD19 and passage through the AutoMACS automated were activated with LPS (50 µg/ml) and one day later were transduced with the VRC01 or control lentivirus (100 ng of p24 antigen, ∼108 transducing units/ml) as described [34]. Transduced or untransduced mouse B cells (5×106 cells) were then intrasplenicly injected into the hCD4/R5/cT1mice three days after LPS-activation. Two days later the mice were intravenously injected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto (1-to 2×107 IU). Seven days later, the mice were bled and serum levels of VRC01 were measured by ELISA as described, [28] and systemic HIV-1 infection was quantified by measuring LucR activity in splenic lysates.
Ethics Statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health under a protocol approved by the Einstein Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number: 20101212). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Results
Construction of Transgenic Mice With Targeted Expression of Human CD4, CCR5 and Cyclin T1 Expression Targeted to CD4+ T Cells and Myeloid-Lineage Cells
We used two vectors to generate a mouse line transgenic for the tightly linked transmission of humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 under the control of a CD4 promoter/enhancer that preferentially targets the expression of the transgenes to CD4 T cells and myeloid-lineage cells (Figure 1A) [11], . The first vector was designed to express equimolar quantities of humanCD4 and humanCCR5 proteins by using a “self-cleaving” picornavirus-like 2A peptide to link these two genes as a single transcript, an approach we previously used to express two genes from a single promoter [13]. The 2A peptide mediates an intraribosomal termination-and-restart event during ribosomal translation of polypeptides which prevents formation of a peptide bond between the two polypeptides it links and thereby produces two separate proteins [35]. Co-injecting this construct into fertilized mouse eggs along with a humancyclin T1 expression plasmid regulated by the same CD4 promoter/enhancer [16], [36] resulted in successful tandem integration and the generation of some founder mice that transmitted these transgenes as a single allele (Figure 1B) [37]. Progeny of a founder mouse selected for breeding expressed humancyclinT1 transgene as determined by immunoblot of their splenocytes and thymocytes (Figure 1C) and humanCD4 and CCR5 as determined by flow cytometric analysis of their PBMC and splenocytes (Figure 2). Targeted transgene expression by the CD4 promoter/enhancer to CD4+ T cells and myeloid-lineage cells was demonstrated by the expression of humanCD4 and humanCCR5 by the majority of the CD4+ T cells in the spleen and peripheral blood as compared to less than 3% of the CD8+ T cells and by the CD11b+ myeloid-lineage cells from the spleen and bone marrow; humanCD4 and CCR5 were co-expressed in the CD4+ CD8+ double positive thymocyte population indicating that expression of humanCD4 and CCR5 did not adversely affect thymocyte maturation (Figure 2).
Figure 2
hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse CD4+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid-lineage cells specifically express human CD4 and CCR5.
hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse mononuclear cells isolated from bone marrow, spleen peripheral blood and thymus were evaluated for expression of human CD4 and CCR5 by flow cytometry after staining with antibodies to mouse CD4, CD8 and CD11b and human CD4 and CCR5. Dot plots of human CD4 and CCR5 staining by hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse mononuclear cells gated for the expression of mouse CD4 (upper panels), mouse CD8 (middle panels) or mouse CD11b (lower panels) are shown with the percentage of positive cells in each quadrant indicated.
hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse CD4+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid-lineage cells specifically express human CD4 and CCR5.
hCD4/R5/cT1mouse mononuclear cells isolated from bone marrow, spleen peripheral blood and thymus were evaluated for expression of humanCD4 and CCR5 by flow cytometry after staining with antibodies to mouseCD4, CD8 and CD11b and humanCD4 and CCR5. Dot plots of humanCD4 and CCR5 staining by hCD4/R5/cT1mouse mononuclear cells gated for the expression of mouseCD4 (upper panels), mouseCD8 (middle panels) or mouseCD11b (lower panels) are shown with the percentage of positive cells in each quadrant indicated.
Productive In Vitro Infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 Mouse CD4+ T Cells and Myeloid-Lineage Cells With HIV-1
We examined whether humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 expression by hCD4/R5/cT1mouseCD4+ T cells and myeloid-lineage cells made them susceptible to HIV-1 infection by infecting them with HIV-1 infectious molecular clones expressing a GFP reporter gene and an Env gene derived either from an R5-tropic isolate, NLENG1i-BaL.ecto, or a R5-tropic transmitted/founder virus, NLENG1i-CH077.ecto [12] and then analyzing them for GFP expression by flow cytometry. Based on our previous demonstration that GM-CSF markedly increased HIV-1 production by myeloid-lineage cells from JR-CSF/hCycT1mice which carry as transgenes a full-length infectious JR-CSF provirus and a CD4 promoter/enhancer-regulated humancyclin T1 construct [16], we postulated that GM-CSF treatment would also facilitate productive HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1mouse myeloid-lineage cells. Three days after hCD4/R5/cT1mouse cells were infected with NLENG1i-BaL.ecto or NLENG1i-CH077.ecto, analysis by flow cytometry demonstrated that about 75% of GM-CSF-treated CD11c+ myeloid-lineage cells and 20% of the activated CD4+ T cells were infected by HIV-1 (Figure 3A). This indicated that while expression of the humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 transgenes enabled the hCD4/R5/cT1mouseCD4+ T cells and myeloid-lineage cells to be infected with HIV-1, hCD4/R5/cT1mouse myeloid-lineage cells supported infection more robustly than the CD4+ T cells.
Figure 3
hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse CD4+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid-lineage cells are susceptible to HIV-1 infection.
(A) Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated hCD4/R5/CT1 mouse CD4 T lymphocytes and GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse bone marrow-derived myeloid-lineage cells were plated in 48 well plates (1×105 cells/well) and inoculated with NLEng1i-CH077.ecto or NLEng1i-Bal.ecto. After 3 days of culture, HIV-1-infected CD4+T cells (upper panels) and CD11c+ myeloid-lineage cells (lower panels) were quantified by flow cytometry based on their expression of GFP. (B) Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated hCD4/R5/CT1 mouse and human CD4 T lymphocytes and GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse bone marrow-derived myeloid lineage-committed cells and human monocytes were infected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto. The cells from triplicate or duplicate cultures were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 and the average LucR activity in the cell lysates ± STE is shown. (C) GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1 myeloid lineage-committed cells were either untreated or treated with indinivir and infected with NL-LucR T2A-BaL.ecto. The cells from duplicate cultures were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 and the average LucR activity in the cell lysates ± STE is shown.
hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse CD4+ T cells and CD11b+ myeloid-lineage cells are susceptible to HIV-1 infection.
(A) Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated hCD4/R5/CT1mouseCD4 T lymphocytes and GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1mouse bone marrow-derived myeloid-lineage cells were plated in 48 well plates (1×105 cells/well) and inoculated with NLEng1i-CH077.ecto or NLEng1i-Bal.ecto. After 3 days of culture, HIV-1-infectedCD4+T cells (upper panels) and CD11c+ myeloid-lineage cells (lower panels) were quantified by flow cytometry based on their expression of GFP. (B) Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated hCD4/R5/CT1mouse and humanCD4 T lymphocytes and GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1mouse bone marrow-derived myeloid lineage-committed cells and human monocytes were infected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto. The cells from triplicate or duplicate cultures were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 and the average LucR activity in the cell lysates ± STE is shown. (C) GM-CSF-stimulated hCD4/R5/cT1 myeloid lineage-committed cells were either untreated or treated with indinivir and infected with NL-LucR T2A-BaL.ecto. The cells from duplicate cultures were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 and the average LucR activity in the cell lysates ± STE is shown.Renilla reniformis luciferase has a short cellular half-life of approximately 3 hours [38] and LucR continues to be expressed over multiple cycles of replication after inoculation. Consequently, infection with the replication-competent molecular clone, NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto, which was engineered to express the LucR reporter gene and the heterologous BaL env gene in cis with all of the HIV-1 open reading frames, permits highly sensitive and specific detection of active HIV-1 replication for several weeks after inoculation [12]. Therefore, we infected CD4+ T cells and myeloid-lineage cells from CD4/R5/cT1mice and humans with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto and compared their relative capacity to support productive in vitro HIV-1 infection. Activated CD4+ T cells and GM-CSF-treated myeloid-lineage cells from hCD4/R5/cT1mice, wild-type mice, and HIV-1-naïve human volunteers were infected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto and LucR activity was measured in the cellular lysates 3, 5 and 7 days later. GM-CSF-treated hCD4/R5/cT1mouse myeloid-lineage cells developed sustained HIV-1 infection as evidenced by the 2-fold increase in LucR activity detected over 7 days of culture at levels 20–25% of the 3-fold increase in LucR activity observed for GM-CSF-stimulated human monocytes, while the hCD4/R5/cT1mouseCD4 T cells supported only transient HIV-1 infection at ∼5% of the levels observed after infection of humanCD4 T cells (Figure 3B). The reduced capacity of hCD4/R5/cT1mouseCD4+ T cells relative to the mouse myeloid-lineage cells to support productive HIV-1 infection is likely due to additional HIV-1 replication blocks reported in mouse T cells [11]. Treatment of the NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto-infected hCD4/R5/cT1mouse myeloid-lineage cells with the HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinivir at doses that inhibit HIV-1 replication in macrophages [39] significantly reduced LucR levels by greater than 95% (p<.01) (Figure 3C), indicating that cellular LucR levels correlated with productive infection of the cells.
Productive Systemic In Vivo Infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 Mice With HIV-1
The development of immunocompetent mice that develop systemic infection after exposure to HIV-1, would greatly advance the development and testing of HIV-1 therapies and vaccines. To determine whether the hCD4/R5/cT1mice developed in vivo infection, we measured LucR activity in the splenocytes 1, 2 and 4 weeks after intrasplenic injection of hCD4/R5/cT1 and C57BL/6 mice with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto. Productive in vivo infection was evident 1 week post-injection as indicated by the detection of significantly higher levels of LucR activity in splenocytes from all of the injected hCD4/R5/cT1mice as compared to almost no LucR detected in splenocytes from injected C57BL/6 mice (p<.001) (Figure 4A). Diffuse infection of the spleen was demonstrated by visualization of LucR reporter gene expression by ex vivo imaging of bioluminescent signals in the spleens of the two NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto-injected hCD4/R5/cT1mice compared to no bioluminescence detected in the spleen from a NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto-injected C57BL/6 mouse (Figure 4B). Further evidence for the development of productive infection was indicated by the detection of a low level of plasma viremia in all of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice 1 week after infection with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto (Figure 4C). While the levels of splenic LucR activity and plasma viremia in the hCD4/R5/cT1mice decreased by 2 to 3 weeks after inoculation, a low level of persistent infection in the spleens continued to be detected 4 weeks after inoculation (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
In vivo HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice. (A) hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and wild-type mice were intrasplenicly injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto.
LucR activity in the splenic lysates from the mice was measured at 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks (n = 5–8 mice/group) after infection. For all experiments, the average LucR activity in the spleens of the mice in each group ± STE is shown. (B) hCD4/R5/cT1 mice (n = 2) or a control C57BL/6 mouse were intrasplenicly injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto and 7 days later the spleens were harvested. After ex vivo injection with RediJect Coelenterazine h, bioluminescent and grey-scale images of isolated spleens from the infected hCD4/R5/cT1 mouse spleens (left and center) and the control C57BL/6 mouse (right) were captured with the IVS Spectrum imager and bioluminescence intensity represented in a pseudocolor image indicating photon counts/second are shown. (C) HIV-1 RNA levels in the plasma of hCD4/R5/cT1 and wild-type mice (n = 3 mice/group) were quantified at 2 and 3 weeks after intrasplenic injection with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto. (D) Five days after hCD4/R5/CT1 mice or wild-type mice were intravaginally challenged with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto (n = 5 mice/group), the LucR levels in leukocytes isolated from the vaginal tissues were determined.
In vivo HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice. (A) hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and wild-type mice were intrasplenicly injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto.
LucR activity in the splenic lysates from the mice was measured at 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks (n = 5–8 mice/group) after infection. For all experiments, the average LucR activity in the spleens of the mice in each group ± STE is shown. (B) hCD4/R5/cT1mice (n = 2) or a control C57BL/6 mouse were intrasplenicly injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto and 7 days later the spleens were harvested. After ex vivo injection with RediJect Coelenterazine h, bioluminescent and grey-scale images of isolated spleens from the infected hCD4/R5/cT1mouse spleens (left and center) and the control C57BL/6 mouse (right) were captured with the IVS Spectrum imager and bioluminescence intensity represented in a pseudocolor image indicating photon counts/second are shown. (C) HIV-1 RNA levels in the plasma of hCD4/R5/cT1 and wild-type mice (n = 3 mice/group) were quantified at 2 and 3 weeks after intrasplenic injection with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto. (D) Five days after hCD4/R5/CT1mice or wild-type mice were intravaginally challenged with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto (n = 5 mice/group), the LucR levels in leukocytes isolated from the vaginal tissues were determined.The mucosal route is the most common site for the acquisition of HIV infection. Therefore, we examined the susceptibility of these mice to HIV-1 acquisition by the vaginal mucosal route. NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto was atraumatically introduced into the vaginas of Depo-Provera-treated hCD4/R5/cT1 and wild-type mice. Five days later, HIV-1 infection was determined by quantifying the level of LucR activity present in vaginal mucosal leukocytes isolated from the vaginal tissue as described [24], [25]. While no LucR was detected in mucosal leukocytes from the wild-type mice, significantly higher levels (p<.01) of LucR activity were detected in mucosal leukocytes isolated from all of the inoculated hCD4/R5/cT1mice. This indicated that efficient HIV-1 acquisition across the mucosal route associated with the initiation of localized HIV-1 infection occurred in the hCD4/R5/cT1mice (Figure 4D).The intravenous route of HIV-1 infection through drug injection with contaminated syringes is a major risk factor for the acquisition and transmission of HIV, accounting for about 5–10% of HIV infections worldwide [40]. We therefore examined whether the hCD4/R5/cT1mice could also be infected by intravenous exposure and used to study HIV transmission by the intravenous route and the role of substance abuse in facilitating HIV-1 acquisition. One week after intravenous injection of hCD4/R5/cT1 and wild-type mice with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto, mononuclear cells were isolated from the mouse spleens, small intestine, lymph node and lungs and examined for luciferase activity as a proxy for quantifying HIV infection. After intravenous injection of NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto, disseminated productive HIV-1 infection, as indicated by the detection of LucR, developed in the mononuclear cells isolated from the mouse spleens, small intestine, lymph nodes and lungs of all of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice compared to no infection in the wild-type mice (p<.0001) (Figure 5). The higher level of HIV-1 infection detected in the spleens compared to the lymph nodes may be due to the efficient delivery of lentiviruses into spleens after intravenous injection [41], [42] or alternatively the level of infection in the iliac lymph nodes we sampled may not be indicative of the infection levels in other lymph nodes.
Figure 5
hCD4/R5/cT1 mice develop disseminated HIV infection after intravenous injection. hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and wild type mice (n = 5 mice/group) were intravenously injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto.
One week later, mononuclear cells were harvested from the mouse spleens, small intestines, iliac lymph nodes and lungs. The average LucR activity in the cellular lysates from the indicated tissues of the hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and wild-type mice in each group ± STE is shown.
hCD4/R5/cT1 mice develop disseminated HIV infection after intravenous injection. hCD4/R5/cT1 mice and wild type mice (n = 5 mice/group) were intravenously injected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto.
One week later, mononuclear cells were harvested from the mouse spleens, small intestines, iliac lymph nodes and lungs. The average LucR activity in the cellular lysates from the indicated tissues of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice and wild-type mice in each group ± STE is shown.
hCD4/R5/cT1 Mice can be Used to Evaluate the Therapeutic Efficacy of Antiretroviral Therapy and of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Delivered Either Passively or By Gene Therapy
We investigated whether the extensive HIV-1 infection detected in all of the hCD4/R5/cT1mouse spleens one week after injection with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto would enable us to use this mouse as a model to evaluate the efficacy of anti-retroviral therapies. Untreated hCD4/R5/cT1mice or hCD4/R5/cT1mice treated with HAART by oral administration of azidothymidine, lamivudine and indinivir [26] for 5 days were intrasplenicly injected with NL-Luc-T2A-BaL.ecto. One week later, the level of HIV-1 replication in their spleens was measured by quantification of LucR activity in splenic lysates. HIV-1 infection was significantly inhibited by almost 99% in all of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice treated with HAART, as compared to the level of HIV-1 infection in the untreated hCD4/R5/cT1mice (p<.01) (Figure 6A).
Figure 6
In vivo HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice is inhibited by antiretroviral therapy or by treatment with a broadly neutralizing antibody.
(A) One group of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice (n = 4 mice) was untreated and another group (n = 4 mice) was started on HAART administered in their drinking water. Five days later these mice were infected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto by intrasplenic injection. (B) hCD4/R5/cT1 mice were untreated (n = 5 mice) or treated with one intravenous dose (1 mg) of VRC01 (n = 5 mice). The next day, the mice were infected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto by intrasplenic injection. One week later, HIV-1 infection was quantified by measuring LucR activity in the splenic lysates. The average LucR activity for the mice in each group +/− STE is shown.
In vivo HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice is inhibited by antiretroviral therapy or by treatment with a broadly neutralizing antibody.
(A) One group of hCD4/R5/cT1mice (n = 4 mice) was untreated and another group (n = 4 mice) was started on HAART administered in their drinking water. Five days later these mice were infected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto by intrasplenic injection. (B) hCD4/R5/cT1mice were untreated (n = 5 mice) or treated with one intravenous dose (1 mg) of VRC01 (n = 5 mice). The next day, the mice were infected with NL4-LucR.T2A-Bal.ecto by intrasplenic injection. One week later, HIV-1 infection was quantified by measuring LucR activity in the splenic lysates. The average LucR activity for the mice in each group +/− STE is shown.The use of broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibodies as a therapeutic modality to treat HIV-1-infected individuals has been supported by a recent study that demonstrated that combinations of potent neutralizing antibodies can control in vivo HIV-1 infection in humanized mice [41]. A transgenicmouse model supporting acute HIV-1 infection does not require access to human hematopoietic stem cells and the individualized engraftment procedures that are required to produce humanized mice. The increased accessibility of this transgenicmouse model would greatly facilitate further studies to optimize the application of this therapeutic approach by determining the bioavailability and synergistic activity of various broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibodies. Therefore, we examined whether the hCD4/R5/cT1mice could be used to evaluate the in vivo capacity of broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies such as VRC01 [28], [29] to inhibit HIV-1 infection. One group of hCD4/R5/cT1mice was intravenously injected with VRC01 (1 mg). This dosage was used because we determined that one week after injection this dose provides an average serum level of VRC01 of ∼60 µg/ml; this concentration is greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for neutralization of about 90% of major circulating HIV-1 clades [28]. The next day, the VRC01-treated and control untreated hCD4/R5/cT1mice were intrasplenicly injected with NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto and one week later the mice were sacrificed and LucR activity in their spleens was determined. Splenic lysates from hCD4/R5/cT1mice treated with VRC01 displayed 95% lower levels (p<.05) of LucR activity as compared to splenic lysates from untreated hCD4/R5/cT1mice (Figure 6B), indicating that VRC01 potently inhibited in vivo HIV-1 infection.Molecular delivery of broadly neutralizing antibodies by genetically engineering cells to secrete the antibodies in vivo is a potential therapeutic approach to complement and/or substitute for anti-retroviral treatment with drugs. We have previously demonstrated that we could utilize genetic engineering to efficiently transduce and program primary human B cells to secrete potent neutralizing antibodies that markedly inhibited infection of humanized NOD/SCID/γc
null mice [30]. Humanized mice were also protected from HIV-1 infection by intramuscular injection of adeno-associated virus vectors encoding broadly neutralizing antibodies which were secreted into the circulation [42]. Therefore, we examined whether the hCD4/R5/cT1mice could be used as a model to evaluate the capacity of gene therapeutic approaches to deliver neutralizing HIV antibodies in vivo and prevent HIV infection. Highly purified B cells isolated from hCD4/R5/cT1mouse spleens were untransduced or transduced with a lentivirus expressing VRC01 and intrasplenicly injected into hCD4/R5/cT1mice. Two days later, hCD4/R5/cT1mice which had either not been injected with B cells or had been intrasplenicly injected with untransduced B cells or transduced B cells were inoculated intravenously with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto. Seven days later, the mice were sacrificed and the serum was analyzed for VRC01 levels and the spleens were evaluated for LucR activity. In vivo production of VRC01 by the transduced B cells was demonstrated by the detection of VRC01 antibody in the serum of the mice intrasplenicly injected with VRC01 lentivirus-transduced B cells and not in the serum of mice intrasplenicly injected with untransduced B cells (Figure 7A). The endogenously produced VRC01 inhibited in vivo infection as evidenced by the significant reduction by about 70% in LucR levels in the spleens of mice intrasplenicly injected with VRC01 lentivirus-transduced B cells compared to mice either not injected with B cells or intrasplenicly injected with untransduced B cells (Figure 7B). Thus, the hCD4/R5/cT1mice can be used as a model to study the in vivo efficacy of gene therapy approaches to deliver broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies as a treatment modality to prevent HIV-1 infection.
Figure 7
HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice is inhibited by VRC01 antibody secreted in vivo by transduced B cells.
hCD4/R5/cT1 mice were uninjected (n = 4 mice) or intrasplenicly injected with highly purified primary B cells which were either untransduced (n = 4 mice) or transduced with the VRC01-expressing lentivirus (n = 4 mice). Two days later, the mice were all inoculated intravenously with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto. Seven days later, the mice were sacrificed. (A) The level of VRC01 antibody in the serum was determined by an ELISA assay (B) The LucR activity in the mouse spleens was quantified. The average VRC01 serum antibody levels and LucR activity in the spleens for the mice in each group +/− STE is shown.
HIV-1 infection of hCD4/R5/cT1 mice is inhibited by VRC01 antibody secreted in vivo by transduced B cells.
hCD4/R5/cT1mice were uninjected (n = 4 mice) or intrasplenicly injected with highly purified primary B cells which were either untransduced (n = 4 mice) or transduced with the VRC01-expressing lentivirus (n = 4 mice). Two days later, the mice were all inoculated intravenously with NL-LucR-T2A-Bal.ecto. Seven days later, the mice were sacrificed. (A) The level of VRC01 antibody in the serum was determined by an ELISA assay (B) The LucR activity in the mouse spleens was quantified. The average VRC01 serum antibody levels and LucR activity in the spleens for the mice in each group +/− STE is shown.
Discussion
One of the major challenges limiting the evaluation and testing of new HIV-1 therapeutics is the availability of an immunocompetent mouse model that is infectible with HIV-1 without the need for transplantation with human tissues. The restricted availability and significant expense associated with infection studies in macaques as well as biological differences between the SIV or SHIV used to infect macaques and HIV, limits their widespread use as an in vivo model to study the efficacy of new therapeutic approaches to treat or prevent HIV-1 infection. While humanized mice constructed by engrafting highly immunodeficientmice with human hematopoietic cells and or tissues overcome some of these limitations, their use is limited by the specialized facilities and techniques required for their construction and housing. Furthermore, the humanized mice display a high degree of mouse-to-mouse variation due to variable levels of engraftment and the heterogeneity of donor tissue and the immune system developed by these mice is suboptimal, precluding their use in vaccine studies. In addition, the immune cells in the humanized mice are human and therefore are not subject to genetic manipulation for experiments using transgenic and knockout mice. A highly creative mouse model that was recently described used transgenic mice carrying an inducible loxP-STOP-loxP luciferase reporter whose expression can be triggered after infection with pseudotyped HIV-1 that expresses Cre recombinase; hepatocytes from these mice are rendered susceptible to HIV entry by infection with intravenously injected recombinant human adenovirus serotype 5 encoding the humanCD4 and CCR5 genes [43]. While useful for studying antibody-mediated inhibition of entry, this is a complex model which only supports HIV-1 entry and not HIV-1 replication and whose target cells, hepatocytes, are not normally a target for HIV-1 infection.In the current study, we reported on the development of a new fully transgenicmouse model, hCD4/R5/cT1mice, which supports in vivo replication of HIV-1 in the appropriate target cells for HIV-1 infection, CD4+ T cells and macrophages. Furthermore, we demonstrated the application of hCD4/R5/cT1mice for studying HIV-1 acquisition and the in vivo efficacy of HIV-1 therapeutics. We developed this model by using a novel strategy of constructing triple-transgenic mice which efficiently transmit humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1 transgenes as a single allele and infecting the mice with replication-competent HIV-1 infectious molecular clones expressing LucR. Infection of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice with the HIV-1 infectious molecular clone expressing LucR enabled the mice to be used as an in vivo system to detect with high sensitivity and specificity the acquisition of HIV-1 infection and to evaluate the in vivo capacity of antiretroviral therapy and broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies to prevent infection. Although the hCD4/R5/cT1mice did not display continued expansion of the acute HIV-1 infection, all of the inoculated mice reproducibly developed substantial primary infection which continued to increase for the first week after intrasplenic or intravenous inoculation. Furthermore, HIV-1 infection occurred in the mucosal tissues of all of the mice inoculated by the vaginal route. This susceptibility to acute HIV-1 infection should enable these mice to be used as a new pre-clinical in vivo model to evaluate the capacity of therapeutics or immune responses such as neutralizing antibodies to block acute HIV-1 infection. In contrast to humanized mice constructed by engrafting immunodeficientmice with human hematopoietic stem cells, these mice have a fully functional murine immune response. Therefore, the hCD4/R5/cT1mouse model should be useful to evaluate the capacity of HIV-1 vaccines to induce protective humoral and cellular adaptive immune responses. These potential applications will also greatly benefit from using the LucR-expressing infectious molecular clones as the challenge inoculum because the NL-Luc-proviral backbone-based infectious molecular clone has been engineered to facilitate the expression of a diverse range of HIV-1env sequences [12]. LucR-expressing infectious molecular clones have been constructed that express over 60 Envs from different clades, including clade A/E and C Envs and transmitted/founder Envs which are relevant for transmission studies and vaccine trials. Infection by these infectious molecular clones that express diverse Envs from clinically-relevant isolates will be particularly useful for applying this mouse model to evaluate the in vivo antiviral efficacy of broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies and the protective capacity of antibodies induced by candidate HIV-1 vaccines to prevent intravenous and mucosal acquisition of HIV-1 infection. Because these mice are genetically identical and do not require the time, effort, expertise, and access to human fetal tissue or cord blood required for constructing humanized mice [5]–[8], [10], they should provide an new in vivo infection model that is highly reproducible, inexpensive and widely available for the HIV-1 research community.While the hCD4/R5/cT1mice should be an excellent in vivo model for evaluating the capacity of therapeutics and the adaptive immune response to prevent HIV-1 infection, a limitation of this model is that the level of HIV-1 infection in the hCD4/R5/CT1mice waned and did not increase after the initial establishment of disseminated infection. This was likely a result of the reduced capacity of the hCD4/R5/CT1mouseCD4+ T cells to support HIV-1 replication due to in vitro post-transcriptional defects in Gag expression, processing and release that severely reduce HIV-1 replication in mouse T cells compared to mouse macrophages [11], [36]. This was supported by our in vitro findings that hCD4/R5/cT1CD4+ T cells developed markedly lower and less sustained in vitro HIV-1 infection as compared to hCD4/R5/cT1 myeloid-lineage cells or primary humanCD4 T cells. The increased HIV-1 production by infected hCD4/R5/cT1mouse macrophages we observed as compared to hCD4/R5/cT1mouse T cells may be due to the capacity of macrophages to utilize a different HIV-1 assembly pathway than T cells [44]. HIV-1 assembly in T cells occurs at the plasma membrane [45], while HIV-1 assembly in macrophages can occur in the late endosomal compartment, particularly the major histocompatibility class II compartment [46]. In vitro GM-CSF-treatment may enable hCD4/R5/cT1mouse myeloid-lineage cells to support in vitro HIV-1 infection at almost 25% of the levels observed after infection of primary human monocyte/macrophages by stimulating the production of multivesicular bodies, a well-described site for Gag assembly and HIV-1 budding from infected cells [47] and thereby circumventing the plasma-membrane-associated blocks that compromise Gag processing and T cell infection. The persistent in vivo infection we observed in mouse spleens one month after inoculation (Figure 4A), albeit at lower levels than 1 week after inoculation, may represent sustained in vivo replication in myeloid-lineage cells.To improve the model and particularly to enable systemic HIV-1 infection after mucosal exposure, we are endeavoring to increase the capacity of mouseCD4+ T cells to support HIV-1 replication by identifying the human genes required to overcome other species-specific blocks to HIV-1 replication which could be expressed as transgenes in hCD4/R5/cT1mice. An alternative approach we are pursuing is to generate HIV-1 variants with an increased capacity to replicate in hCD4/R5/cT1mice. We have crossed the hCD4/R5/cT1mice with our JR-CSF/hu-CycT1mice [16] to generate mice whose CD4 T cells and myeloid-lineage committed cells express the JR-CSF proviral transgene and humanCD4, CCR5 and cyclin T1. Support of the full HIV-1 replication cycle including the error-prone step of reverse transcription by these mice, should populate the mice with a swarm of randomly generated and sequentially divergent HIV quasipecies which over time should undergo in vivo selection for their increased capacity to replicate in mouse cells as described for the in vivo selection of drug-resistant and immune-evasion isolates [48]. Identification of mutations that increase the capacity of HIV-1 to replicate in mouse cells will enable us to genetically alter NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto to increase its capacity to replicate in mouse cells. Infection with this modified NL-LucR.T2A-BaL.ecto may support the development of sustained infection in hCD4/R5/cT1mice and/or systemic infection after mucosal exposure, further enhancing the utility of the hCD4/R5/cT1mice for evaluating the efficacy of anti-HIV-1 therapeutics and vaccines.
Authors: H Deng; R Liu; W Ellmeier; S Choe; D Unutmaz; M Burkhart; P Di Marzio; S Marmon; R E Sutton; C M Hill; C B Davis; S C Peiper; T J Schall; D R Littman; N R Landau Journal: Nature Date: 1996-06-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kalonji R Collins; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu; Mianda Wu; Henry Luzze; John L Johnson; Christina Hirsch; Zahra Toossi; Eric J Arts Journal: J Virol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Sarah Palmer; Ann P Wiegand; Frank Maldarelli; Holly Bazmi; JoAnn M Mican; Michael Polis; Robin L Dewar; Angeline Planta; Shuying Liu; Julia A Metcalf; John W Mellors; John M Coffin Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Michael O Alberti; Jennifer J Jones; Riccardo Miglietta; Haitao Ding; Rakesh K Bakshi; Tara G Edmonds; John C Kappes; Christina Ochsenbauer Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Deanna Saylor; Alex M Dickens; Ned Sacktor; Norman Haughey; Barbara Slusher; Mikhail Pletnikov; Joseph L Mankowski; Amanda Brown; David J Volsky; Justin C McArthur Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Chunxia Zhao; Manjula Gunawardana; Francois Villinger; Marc M Baum; Mariana Remedios-Chan; Thomas R Moench; Larry Zeitlin; Kevin J Whaley; Ognian Bohorov; Thomas J Smith; Deborah J Anderson; John A Moss Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: David Wensel; Yongnian Sun; Jonathan Davis; Zhufang Li; Sharon Zhang; Thomas McDonagh; David Langley; Tracy Mitchell; Sebastien Tabruyn; Patrick Nef; Mark Cockett; Mark Krystal Journal: J Virol Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Hannah S Sperber; Padma Priya Togarrati; Kyle A Raymond; Mohamed S Bouzidi; Renata Gilfanova; Alan G Gutierrez; Marcus O Muench; Satish K Pillai Journal: FASEB J Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 5.191