Literature DB >> 23690535

Interplay between sucrose and folate modulates auxin signaling in Arabidopsis.

Michael E Stokes1, Abhishek Chattopadhyay, Olivia Wilkins, Eiji Nambara, Malcolm M Campbell.   

Abstract

As sessile organisms growing in an ever-changing environment, plants must integrate multiple regulatory inputs to promote the appropriate developmental responses. One such nutritional signal is cellular sugar levels, which rise and fall throughout the day and affect a variety of developmental processes. To uncover signaling pathways that modulate sugar perception, compounds from the Library of Active Compounds in Arabidopsis were screened for the ability to perturb developmental responses to sucrose (Suc) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings. This screen found that sulfonamides, which inhibit folate biosynthesis in plants, restrict hypocotyl elongation in a sugar-dependent fashion. Transcriptome analysis identified a small set of transcripts that respond to the interaction between sulfonamide and Suc, including a number of transcripts encoding Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acids, negative regulators of auxin signal transduction. Chemical inhibition of auxin transport or genetic disruption of auxin signaling relieved this interaction, suggesting that responses to these two nutritional stimuli are mediated by auxin. Reporter systems used to track auxin signaling and distribution showed enhanced activity in the vascular region of the hypocotyl in response to cotreatment of Suc and sulfonamide, yet no change in auxin abundance was observed. Taken together, these findings suggest that the interplay between Suc and folates acts to fine-tune auxin sensitivity and influences auxin distribution during seedling development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690535      PMCID: PMC3707552          DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.215095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  77 in total

1.  Functional classification of drugs by properties of their pairwise interactions.

Authors:  Pamela Yeh; Ariane I Tschumi; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Analysis of Arabidopsis glucose insensitive mutants, gin5 and gin6, reveals a central role of the plant hormone ABA in the regulation of plant vegetative development by sugar.

Authors:  F Arenas-Huertero; A Arroyo; L Zhou; J Sheen; P León
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The Arabidopsis sugar-insensitive mutants sis4 and sis5 are defective in abscisic acid synthesis and response.

Authors:  R J Laby; M S Kincaid; D Kim; S I Gibson
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 4.  Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms.

Authors:  Filip Rolland; Elena Baena-Gonzalez; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

5.  ONE-CARBON METABOLISM IN HIGHER PLANTS.

Authors:  Andrew D Hanson; Sanja Roje
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2001-06

6.  Arabidopsis dihydropteroate synthase: general properties and inhibition by reaction product and sulfonamides.

Authors:  V Prabhu; H Lui; J King
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  MASSUGU2 encodes Aux/IAA19, an auxin-regulated protein that functions together with the transcriptional activator NPH4/ARF7 to regulate differential growth responses of hypocotyl and formation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Tatematsu; Satoshi Kumagai; Hideki Muto; Atsuko Sato; Masaaki K Watahiki; Reneé M Harper; Emmanuel Liscum; Kotaro T Yamamoto
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins.

Authors:  Sang-Youl Park; Pauline Fung; Noriyuki Nishimura; Davin R Jensen; Hiroaki Fujii; Yang Zhao; Shelley Lumba; Julia Santiago; Americo Rodrigues; Tsz-Fung F Chow; Simon E Alfred; Dario Bonetta; Ruth Finkelstein; Nicholas J Provart; Darrell Desveaux; Pedro L Rodriguez; Peter McCourt; Jian-Kang Zhu; Julian I Schroeder; Brian F Volkman; Sean R Cutler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway-dependent sugar sensing as a mechanism for regulation of root ion transporters by photosynthesis.

Authors:  Laurence Lejay; Judith Wirth; Marjorie Pervent; Joanna Marie-France Cross; Pascal Tillard; Alain Gojon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Chemical combination effects predict connectivity in biological systems.

Authors:  Joseph Lehár; Grant R Zimmermann; Andrew S Krueger; Raymond A Molnar; Jebediah T Ledell; Adrian M Heilbut; Glenn F Short; Leanne C Giusti; Garry P Nolan; Omar A Magid; Margaret S Lee; Alexis A Borisy; Brent R Stockwell; Curtis T Keith
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  25 in total

1.  Importance of epidermal clocks for regulation of hypocotyl elongation through PIF4 and IAA29.

Authors:  Hanako Shimizu; Kotaro Torii; Takashi Araki; Motomu Endo
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2016

2.  Transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with increased sucrose phosphate synthase activity shows enhanced growth when grown under N2-fixing conditions.

Authors:  Sayed Gebril; Mark Seger; Fabiola Muro Villanueva; Jose Luis Ortega; Suman Bagga; Champa Sengupta-Gopalan
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Dihydrofolate Reductase/Thymidylate Synthase Fine-Tunes the Folate Status and Controls Redox Homeostasis in Plants.

Authors:  Vera Gorelova; Jolien De Lepeleire; Jeroen Van Daele; Dick Pluim; Coline Meï; Ann Cuypers; Olivier Leroux; Fabrice Rébeillé; Jan H M Schellens; Dieter Blancquaert; Christophe P Stove; Dominique Van Der Straeten
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  The MEDIATOR genes MED12 and MED13 control Arabidopsis root system configuration influencing sugar and auxin responses.

Authors:  Javier Raya-González; Jesús Salvador López-Bucio; José Carlos Prado-Rodríguez; León Francisco Ruiz-Herrera; Ángel Arturo Guevara-García; José López-Bucio
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Spatial transcriptional signatures define margin morphogenesis along the proximal-distal and medio-lateral axes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves.

Authors:  Ciera C Martinez; Siyu Li; Margaret R Woodhouse; Keiko Sugimoto; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Towards personalized agriculture: what chemical genomics can bring to plant biotechnology.

Authors:  Michael E Stokes; Peter McCourt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  De novo Taproot Transcriptome Sequencing and Analysis of Major Genes Involved in Sucrose Metabolism in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.).

Authors:  Rugang Yu; Liang Xu; Wei Zhang; Yan Wang; Xiaobo Luo; Ronghua Wang; Xianwen Zhu; Yang Xie; Benard Karanja; Liwang Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  A methyl esterase 1 (PvMES1) promotes the salicylic acid pathway and enhances Fusarium wilt resistance in common beans.

Authors:  Renfeng Xue; Ming Feng; Jian Chen; Weide Ge; Matthew W Blair
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Characterization of the largest effector gene cluster of Ustilago maydis.

Authors:  Thomas Brefort; Shigeyuki Tanaka; Nina Neidig; Gunther Doehlemann; Volker Vincon; Regine Kahmann
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  The 5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate proteome links folates with C/N metabolism and reveals feedback regulation of folate biosynthesis.

Authors:  Weichao Li; Qiuju Liang; Ratnesh Chandra Mishra; Raul Sanchez-Mu Oz; Huan Wang; Xin Chen; Dominique Van Der Straeten; Chunyi Zhang; Youli Xiao
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 12.085

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.