OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to seek radiation dose responses separately for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic (MET) colorectal liver tumours to establish tumour control probabilities (TCPs) for radiotherapy (RT) of liver tumours. METHODS: The records of 36 HCC and 26 MET colorectal liver tumour patients were reviewed. The median dose per fraction and total dose were 4 Gy (2-10 Gy) and 52 Gy (29-83 Gy) for the HCC group and 3.6 Gy (2.0-13.0 Gy) and 55 Gy (30-80 Gy) for the MET group, respectively. Median tumour diameter was 6.6 cm (3.0-18.0 cm) and 5.0 cm (1.0-13.0 cm) for the HCC and MET groups, respectively. A logistic TCP model was fitted to the response data for each group using the maximum likelihood method. RESULTS: 50% and 90% probabilities of 6-month local control were estimated to be achievable by 2 Gy per fraction equivalent doses (α/β=10 Gy) of 53 Gy and 84 Gy for the HCC group and 70 Gy and 95 Gy for the MET group, respectively. Actuarial 1-year local control for the HCC and MET groups was 65% (45-85%) and 32% (6-58%), respectively, whereas median time to failure was 543 days (374-711 days) and 183 days (72-294 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-response relationships were found and modelled for the HCC and MET patient groups, with a higher dose required to control MET tumours. RT offers better local control for HCC than for MET colorectal liver tumours at our institution. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: An improved understanding of radiation dose-response relationships for primary and MET colorectal liver tumours will help inform future dose prescriptions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to seek radiation dose responses separately for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic (MET) colorectal liver tumours to establish tumour control probabilities (TCPs) for radiotherapy (RT) of liver tumours. METHODS: The records of 36 HCC and 26 MET colorectal liver tumourpatients were reviewed. The median dose per fraction and total dose were 4 Gy (2-10 Gy) and 52 Gy (29-83 Gy) for the HCC group and 3.6 Gy (2.0-13.0 Gy) and 55 Gy (30-80 Gy) for the MET group, respectively. Median tumour diameter was 6.6 cm (3.0-18.0 cm) and 5.0 cm (1.0-13.0 cm) for the HCC and MET groups, respectively. A logistic TCP model was fitted to the response data for each group using the maximum likelihood method. RESULTS: 50% and 90% probabilities of 6-month local control were estimated to be achievable by 2 Gy per fraction equivalent doses (α/β=10 Gy) of 53 Gy and 84 Gy for the HCC group and 70 Gy and 95 Gy for the MET group, respectively. Actuarial 1-year local control for the HCC and MET groups was 65% (45-85%) and 32% (6-58%), respectively, whereas median time to failure was 543 days (374-711 days) and 183 days (72-294 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-response relationships were found and modelled for the HCC and MET patient groups, with a higher dose required to control MET tumours. RT offers better local control for HCC than for MET colorectal liver tumours at our institution. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: An improved understanding of radiation dose-response relationships for primary and MET colorectal liver tumours will help inform future dose prescriptions.
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Beom Kyung Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Jin Sil Seong; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Ja Kyung Kim; Do Youn Lee; Kwang Hoon Lee; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: Liver Int Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Daniel T Chang; Anand Swaminath; Margaret Kozak; Julie Weintraub; Albert C Koong; John Kim; Rob Dinniwell; James Brierley; Brian D Kavanagh; Laura A Dawson; Tracey E Schefter Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Emile Tan; Nikos Gouvas; R John Nicholls; Paul Ziprin; Evaghelos Xynos; Paris P Tekkis Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Richard Pötter; Stefan Lang; Elena Fidarova; Petra Georg; Wolfgang Dörr; Christian Kirisits Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Ahsun Riaz; Robert K Ryu; Laura M Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Robert J Lewandowski; Jeet Minocha; Saad M Ibrahim; Kent T Sato; Talia Baker; Frank H Miller; Steven Newman; Reed Omary; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Riad Salem Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark T Lee; John J Kim; Robert Dinniwell; James Brierley; Gina Lockwood; Rebecca Wong; Bernard Cummings; Jolie Ringash; Regina V Tse; Jennifer J Knox; Laura A Dawson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Awalpreet S Chadha; Jillian R Gunther; Cheng-En Hsieh; Maureen Aliru; Lakshmi S Mahadevan; Bhanu P Venkatesulu; Christopher H Crane; Prajnan Das; Joseph M Herman; Eugene J Koay; Cullen Taniguchi; Emma B Holliday; Bruce D Minsky; Yelin Suh; Peter Park; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Sam Beddar; Bruno C Odisio; Sanjay Gupta; Evelyne Loyer; Harmeet Kaur; Kanwal Raghav; Milind M Javle; Ahmed O Kaseb; Sunil Krishnan Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Charalampos S Floudas; Gagandeep Brar; Donna Mabry-Hrones; Austin G Duffy; Bradford Wood; Elliot Levy; Venkatesh Krishnasamy; Suzanne Fioravanti; Cecilia M Bonilla; Melissa Walker; Maria Pia Morelli; David E Kleiner; Seth M Steinberg; William D Figg; Tim F Greten; Changqing Xie Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Philippe d'Abadie; Stephan Walrand; Michel Hesse; Ivan Borbath; Renaud Lhommel; François Jamar Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Sun Hyun Bae; Mi-Sook Kim; Won Il Jang; Chul-Seung Kay; Woochul Kim; Eun Seog Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Kwang Mo Yang; Kyu Chan Lee; A Ram Chang; Sunmi Jo Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Michael I Lock; Jonathan Klein; Hans T Chung; Joseph M Herman; Edward Y Kim; William Small; Nina A Mayr; Simon S Lo Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2017-05-18
Authors: Naila Naz; Shakil Ahmad; Silke Cameron; Federico Moriconi; Margret Rave-Fränk; Hans Christiansen; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Giuliano Ramadori; Ihtzaz A Malik Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.411