Literature DB >> 23690434

Commissioning of a new wide-bore MRI scanner for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer.

G P Liney1, S C Owen, A K E Beaumont, V R Lazar, D J Manton, A W Beavis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A combination of CT and MRI is recommended for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancers, and optimal spatial co-registration is achieved by imaging in the treatment position using the necessary immobilisation devices on both occasions, something which requires wide-bore scanners. Quality assurance experiments were carried out to commission a newly installed 1.5-T wide-bore MRI scanner and a dedicated, flexible six-channel phased array head and neck coil.
METHODS: Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial signal uniformity were quantified using a homogeneous aqueous phantom, and geometric distortion was quantified using a phantom with water-filled fiducials in a grid pattern. Volunteer scans were also used to determine the in vivo image quality. Clinically relevant T1 weighted and T2 weighted fat-suppressed sequences were assessed in multiple scan planes (both sequences fast spin echo based). The performance of two online signal uniformity correction schemes, one utilising low-resolution reference scans and the other not utilising low-resolution reference scans, was compared.
RESULTS: Geometric distortions, for a ±35-kHz bandwidth, were <1 mm for locations within 10 cm of the isocentre rising to 1.8 mm at 18 cm away. SNR was above 50, and uniformity in the axial plane was 71% and 95% before and after uniformity correction, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combined performance of the wide-bore scanner and the dedicated coil was adjudged adequate, although superior-inferior spatial coverage was slightly limited in the lower neck. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: These results will be of interest to the increasing number of oncology centres that are seeking to incorporate MRI into planning practice using dedicated equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690434      PMCID: PMC3922172          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  21 in total

1.  Paranasal sinuses and nasopharynx CT and MRI.

Authors:  K W Sievers; H Greess; U Baum; M Dobritz; M Lenz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Characteristics and quality assurance of a dedicated open 0.23 T MRI for radiation therapy simulation.

Authors:  Dennis Mah; Michael Steckner; Elizabeth Palacio; Raj Mitra; Theresa Richardson; Gerald E Hanks
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Authors:  Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours using MRI alone.

Authors:  A W Beavis; P Gibbs; R A Dealey; V J Whitton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities.

Authors:  M O'Donnell; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of tumors of the head and neck.

Authors:  C D Phillips; S B Gay; R L Newton; P A Levine
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Correlation of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and MR fat suppression results for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R D Tien; K T Robbins
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Analysis and correction of geometric distortions in 1.5 T magnetic resonance images for use in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  M A Moerland; R Beersma; R Bhagwandien; H K Wijrdeman; C J Bakker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Effects of geometric distortion in 0.2T MRI on radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bernhard Petersch; Joachim Bogner; Annette Fransson; Thomas Lorang; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Influence of MRI on target volume delineation and IMRT planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Bahman Emami; Anil Sethi; Guy J Petruzzelli
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  8 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Quantitative analysis of image quality for acceptance and commissioning of an MRI simulator with a semiautomatic method.

Authors:  Xinyuan Chen; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Imaging performance of a high-field in-line magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator with a patient rotation system for fixed-gantry radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jarryd G Buckley; Bin Dong; Gary P Liney
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  Design and construction of a customizable phantom for the characterization of the three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion.

Authors:  Tarraf Torfeh; Rabih Hammoud; Satheesh Paloor; Yoganathan Arunachalam; Souha Aouadi; Noora Al-Hammadi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Image Non-Uniformity Correction for 3-T Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver.

Authors:  Gou Ogasawara; Yusuke Inoue; Keiji Matsunaga; Kaoru Fujii; Hirofumi Hata; Yuki Takato
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Geometric accuracy of the MR imaging techniques in the presence of motion.

Authors:  Tarraf Torfeh; Rabih Hammoud; Tarek El Kaissi; Maeve McGarry; Souha Aouadi; Hadi Fayad; Noora Al-Hammadi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Implementation of a dedicated 1.5 T MR scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning featuring a novel high-channel coil setup for brain imaging in treatment position.

Authors:  Veit Mengling; Christoph Bert; Rosalind Perrin; Siti Masitho; Thomas Weissmann; Sina Mansoorian; Hadi Siavooshhaghighi; Rolf Janka; Sylvain Doussin; Melanie Habatsch; Rainer Fietkau; Florian Putz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Image quality and acquisition time assessments for phase oversampling in compressed sensing sensitivity encoding: Comparison with conventional SENSE.

Authors:  Ji Sung Jang; Ho Beom Lee; Chong Hyun Suh; Min Hee Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.