PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the motivations and barriers facing small practices that seek to adopt the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, as well as the type of help and strategies they use. METHODS: We surveyed lead physicians at practices with fewer than 5 physicians, stratified by state and level of National Committee for Quality Assurance PCMH recognition, using a Web-based survey with telephone, fax, and mail follow-up. The response rate was 59%, yielding a total sample of 249 practices from 23 states. RESULTS: Improving quality and patient experience were the strongest motivations for PCMH implementation; time and resources were the biggest barriers. Most practices participated in demonstration projects or received financial rewards for PCMH, and most received training or other kinds of help. Practices found training and help related to completing the PCMH application to be the most useful. Training for patients was both less common and less valued. The most commonly used strategies for practice transformation were staff training, systematizing processes of care, and quality measurement/goal setting. The least commonly endorsed strategy was involving patients in quality improvement. Practices with a higher level of PCMH recognition were more likely to have electronic health records, to report barriers, and to use measurement-based quality improvement strategies. CONCLUSIONS: To spread the adoption of the PCMH model among small practices, financial support, practical training, and other help are likely to continue to be important. Few practices involved patients in their implementation, so it would be helpful to test the impact of greater patient involvement in the PCMH.
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the motivations and barriers facing small practices that seek to adopt the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, as well as the type of help and strategies they use. METHODS: We surveyed lead physicians at practices with fewer than 5 physicians, stratified by state and level of National Committee for Quality Assurance PCMH recognition, using a Web-based survey with telephone, fax, and mail follow-up. The response rate was 59%, yielding a total sample of 249 practices from 23 states. RESULTS: Improving quality and patient experience were the strongest motivations for PCMH implementation; time and resources were the biggest barriers. Most practices participated in demonstration projects or received financial rewards for PCMH, and most received training or other kinds of help. Practices found training and help related to completing the PCMH application to be the most useful. Training for patients was both less common and less valued. The most commonly used strategies for practice transformation were staff training, systematizing processes of care, and quality measurement/goal setting. The least commonly endorsed strategy was involving patients in quality improvement. Practices with a higher level of PCMH recognition were more likely to have electronic health records, to report barriers, and to use measurement-based quality improvement strategies. CONCLUSIONS: To spread the adoption of the PCMH model among small practices, financial support, practical training, and other help are likely to continue to be important. Few practices involved patients in their implementation, so it would be helpful to test the impact of greater patient involvement in the PCMH.
Authors: Leif I Solberg; Mary C Hroscikoski; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen; Peter G Harper; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mary C Hroscikoski; Leif I Solberg; Joann M Sperl-Hillen; Peter G Harper; Michael P McGrail; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Sean R McClellan; Robin R Gillies; Jeffrey A Alexander; Melinda L Drum Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jessica E Murphy; David Washington; Ziming Xuan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Mari-Lynn Drainoni Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2018-12-03
Authors: Robert D Lieberthal; Tom Karagiannis; Evan Bilheimer; Manisha Verma; Colleen Payton; Mona Sarfaty; George Valko Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Bijal A Balasubramanian; Miguel Marino; Deborah J Cohen; Rikki L Ward; Alex Preston; Rachel J Springer; Stephan R Lindner; Samuel Edwards; K John McConnell; Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Leif I Solberg Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Anaïs Tuepker; Devan Kansagara; Eleni Skaperdas; Christina Nicolaidis; Sandra Joos; Michael Alperin; David Hickam Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Patricia P Ramsay; Lawrence P Casalino; Sean McClellan; Zosha K Kandel; Stephen M Shortell Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Timothy W Farrell; Leif I Solberg; Carolyn A Berry; Neil S Calman; Peter F Cronholm; Katrina E Donahue; David L Driscoll; Diane Hauser; Jeanne W McAllister; Sanjeev N Mehta; Robert J Reid; Ming Tai-Seale; Christopher G Wise; Michael D Fetters; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Hector P Rodriguez; Cherie P Brunker; Erin L McGinley; Rachel L Day; Debra L Scammon; Michael I Harrison; Janice L Genevro; Robert A Gabbay; Michael K Magill Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 3.929