Literature DB >> 23690245

The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers?

Christine Parker1, Carly Brunswick, Jane Kotey.   

Abstract

This paper investigates what "free-range" eggs are available for sale in supermarkets in Australia, what "free-range" means on product labelling, and what alternative "free-range" offers to cage production. The paper concludes that most of the "free-range" eggs currently available in supermarkets do not address animal welfare, environmental sustainability, and public health concerns but, rather, seek to drive down consumer expectations of what these issues mean by balancing them against commercial interests. This suits both supermarkets and egg producers because it does not challenge dominant industrial-scale egg production and the profits associated with it. A serious approach to free-range would confront these arrangements, and this means it may be impossible to truthfully label many of the "free-range" eggs currently available in the dominant supermarkets as free-range.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690245     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9448-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK.

Authors:  C M Sherwin; G J Richards; C J Nicol
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 2.  The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: history and prospects.

Authors:  Michael C Appleby
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.440

3.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

Authors:  H A SIMON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systems.

Authors:  R H Fleming; C C Whitehead; D Alvey; N G Gregory; L J Wilkins
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.095

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Eating people is wrong … or how we decide morally what to eat.

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Leigh E Rich
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Food ethics: issues of consumption and production : self-restraint and voluntaristic measures are not enough.

Authors:  Rob Irvine
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Can Labelling Create Transformative Food System Change for Human and Planetary Health? A Case Study of Meat.

Authors:  Christine Parker; Rachel Carey; Fiona Haines; Hope Johnson
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.