Literature DB >> 23690154

Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the threshold for serological markers.

Pouya Alijanipour1, Hooman Bakhshi, Javad Parvizi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have recently been suggested as diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. Thresholds for these markers should be reexamined since they have been determined arbitrarily. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Based on recently defined criteria for PJI, we determined (1) whether there is a difference in the threshold value of ESR and CRP between hips and knees, (2) whether the threshold value for ESR and CRP should be different for early-postoperative and late-chronic PJI, and (3) the optimal thresholds for ESR and CRP in PJI diagnosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1962 patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic failure (1095 hips, 594 knees) or first onset of PJI (108 hips, 165 knees) between 2000 and 2009. The PJI diagnosis was made independent of ESR and CRP using criteria recently proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Patients with comorbidities that confound ESR and CRP were not included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine thresholds.
RESULTS: ESR and CRP levels in late-chronic PJI were higher in knees than in hips. Optimal thresholds for ESR and CRP were 48.5 mm/hour and 13.5 mg/L in hips and 46.5 mm/hour and 23.5 mg/L in knees, respectively. In early-postoperative PJI, ESR and CRP were similar in both joints with common thresholds of 54.5 mm/hour and 23.5 mg/L, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest a similar threshold for ESR but not for CRP should be implemented for late-chronic hips and knees. Optimal magnitudes are higher than conventional thresholds, indicating the need for refinement of thresholds if ESR and CRP are to be criteria for PJI diagnosis. Early-postoperative and late-chronic PJI might require different thresholds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690154      PMCID: PMC3773107          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3070-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  EDTA samples for the measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate using Sedimatic 100 analyser.

Authors:  J Horsti
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Challenges in periprosthetic knee-joint infection.

Authors:  Parham Sendi; Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.595

3.  Comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate measurement by the automated SEDIsystem and conventional Westergren method using the Bland and Altman statistical method.

Authors:  Suad M AlFadhli; Anwar M Al-Awadhi
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 4.  The erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Authors:  J S Olshaker; D A Jerrard
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Bauer; Javad Parvizi; Naomi Kobayashi; Viktor Krebs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study.

Authors:  E F Berbari; A D Hanssen; M C Duffy; J M Steckelberg; D M Ilstrup; W S Harmsen; D R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive culture.

Authors:  P F Lachiewicz; G D Rogers; H C Thomason
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Elie F Berbari; Camelia Marculescu; Irene Sia; Brian D Lahr; Arlen D Hanssen; James M Steckelberg; Rachel Gullerud; Douglas R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  S Larsson; U Thelander; S Friberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections: Current concepts and present status.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Raman Sardana; Hena Butta; Leena Mendiratta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-16

2.  Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Zanjing Zhai; Chuanlong Wu; Fangchun Jin; Haowei Li; Lei Wang; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Wengang Wang; Huiwu Li; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhenan Zhu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Does Change in ESR and CRP Guide the Timing of Two-stage Arthroplasty Reimplantation?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; Brian M Curtin; Susan M Odum; Michael B Cross; J Ryan Martin; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Laboratory-based versus qualitative assessment of α-defensin in periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo de Matteo; Tiziana Ascione; Sigismondo Luca Di Donato; Cristiano De Franco; Francesco Smeraglia; Andrea Baldini; Massimo Mariconda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Infection post-total knee replacement: current concepts.

Authors:  Pouya Alijanipour; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

6.  Prognostic Factors for Success After Irrigation and Debridement With Modular Component Exchange for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian M Klare; Thomas A Fortney; Peter W Kahng; Andrew P Cox; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  C-reactive protein may misdiagnose prosthetic joint infections, particularly chronic and low-grade infections.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; María E Portillo; Lluís Puig-Verdié; Albert Alier; Santos Martínez; Lluisa Sorlí; Juan P Horcajada; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  The Expanding Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosing Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Ardalan Sayan; Adam Kopiec; Alisina Shahi; Madhav Chowdhry; Matthew Bullock; Ali Oliashirazi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

9.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in Medicare patients: multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Paul M Lichstein; James G Dolan; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Static antibiotic spacers augmented by calcium sulphate impregnated beads in revision TKA: Surgical technique and review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Risitano; Luigi Sabatini; Francesco Atzori; Alessandro Massè; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.