Literature DB >> 23689949

Magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous morphological and functional evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Yasuhiro Miyazaki1, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Mitsuhiro Sumikawa, Makoto Yamasaki, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Hiroshi Miyata, Shuji Takiguchi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Noriyuki Tomiyama, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of esophageal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for the diagnosis of achalasia.
METHODS: Eleven patients with suspected achalasia and three normal subjects underwent fMRI while swallowing clear liquid with original sequences; "T2-weighed single-shot fast spin-echo" and "Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition". The fMRI-based diagnosis was compared with that based on manometry. The luminal fluctuation index (LFI) and Dd/Ds ratio were used for the objective evaluation of the esophageal peristalsis and relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).
RESULTS: Functional MRI showed a dilated tortuous esophagus with no tumor, poor clearance, simultaneous waves, aperistalsis, and impaired LES relaxation in all but one case, allowing the diagnosis of achalasia with accuracy similar to that of manometry. The LFI (median 0.08, range 0.03-0.25) and Dd/Ds ratio (1.40, 1.0-2.3) of the patient group were significantly lower than those of the normal subjects [1.50, 2.32-4.05, and 2.59 (2.32-4.05)]. No severe adverse events directly related to fMRI were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Using our protocol, fMRI was considered to be safe and feasible for the diagnosis of achalasia. Given the widespread use of MRI, esophageal fMRI, which does not require exposure to radiation, could be a potentially useful diagnostic tool for patients with esophageal motility disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23689949     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0617-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  16 in total

1.  Initial experience with magnetic resonance fluoroscopy in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Comparison with manometry and barium fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Fortunee Irene Habib; Ernesto Tomei; Pasquale Paolantonio; Michele Anzidei; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Performing cardiac MR imaging: an overview.

Authors:  Mehdi Poustchi-Amin; Fernando R Gutierrez; Jeffrey J Brown; Scott A Mirowitz; Vamsidhar R Narra; Naoki Takahashi; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Risk factors for diagnostic delay in achalasia.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; U Köhne; T Junginger; T Westermeier
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Epidemiology and demographics of achalasia.

Authors:  J F Mayberry
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2001-04

Review 5.  Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  S J Spechler; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding.

Authors:  Woosuk Park; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; M E Baker; E Achkar; J E Richter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Achalasia: an overview of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel Pohl; Radu Tutuian
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.008

9.  Evaluation of esophageal peristalsis in patients with esophageal tumors: initial experience with cine MR imaging.

Authors:  Takashi Koyama; Shigeaki Umeoka; Tsuneo Saga; Go Watanabe; Ken Tamai; Ari Kobayashi; Akira Hiraga; Yutaka Shimada; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Functional magnetic resonance in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Francesco Covotta; Luca Piretta; Danilo Badiali; Andrea Laghi; Tommaso Biondi; Enrico S Corazziari; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Will MRI of gastrointestinal function parallel the clinical success of cine cardiac MRI?

Authors:  Caroline Hoad; Christopher Clarke; Luca Marciani; Martin John Graves; Maura Corsetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Short-term surgical outcomes of reduced port surgery for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Kazuto Tsuboi; Masato Hoshino; Se Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Yoshio Ishibashi; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Four-dimensional impedance manometry derived from esophageal high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel analysis paradigm.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Neelesh A Patankar; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of gastrointestinal motor function and fluid distribution.

Authors:  Asseel Khalaf; Caroline L Hoad; Robin C Spiller; Penny A Gowland; Gordon W Moran; Luca Marciani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-11-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.