Richard D Fremont1, Todd W Rice. 1. aDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Meharry Medical College bDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nutrition in the critically ill patient remains a controversial topic. Most clinicians have viewed nutrition as part of patient care but not as a therapeutic intervention. Recent studies have looked at type and timing of nutrition to determine whether they affect important clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Large-scale, multicentre randomized trials have found that supplemental parenteral nutrition has a deleterious effect in comparison to enteral nutrition alone. Use of early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients in whom enteral nutrition was contraindicated did not significantly improve clinical outcomes. Also, low-dose or trophic enteral nutrition has similar benefits with less gastrointestinal complications compared with early full dose caloric feedings. The timing of early nutrition has been defined in most large-scale studies as beginning within 48 h of intubation, though some earlier studies used a 24-h cut-off point with some improved outcomes. SUMMARY: Although not strong, the best available data suggest that critically ill patients should be started on enteral tube feeds within 48 h of intubation whenever possible. The use of parenteral nutrition should be limited within the first 6 days, and not used to augment caloric intake. Finally, similar benefits are seen in patients receiving minimal enteral feeds versus full caloric enteral nutrition.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nutrition in the critically illpatient remains a controversial topic. Most clinicians have viewed nutrition as part of patient care but not as a therapeutic intervention. Recent studies have looked at type and timing of nutrition to determine whether they affect important clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Large-scale, multicentre randomized trials have found that supplemental parenteral nutrition has a deleterious effect in comparison to enteral nutrition alone. Use of early parenteral nutrition in critically illpatients in whom enteral nutrition was contraindicated did not significantly improve clinical outcomes. Also, low-dose or trophic enteral nutrition has similar benefits with less gastrointestinal complications compared with early full dose caloric feedings. The timing of early nutrition has been defined in most large-scale studies as beginning within 48 h of intubation, though some earlier studies used a 24-h cut-off point with some improved outcomes. SUMMARY: Although not strong, the best available data suggest that critically illpatients should be started on enteral tube feeds within 48 h of intubation whenever possible. The use of parenteral nutrition should be limited within the first 6 days, and not used to augment caloric intake. Finally, similar benefits are seen in patients receiving minimal enteral feeds versus full caloric enteral nutrition.
Authors: G Hernandez; N Velasco; C Wainstein; L Castillo; G Bugedo; A Maiz; F Lopez; S Guzman; C Vargas Journal: J Crit Care Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Todd W Rice; Arthur P Wheeler; B Taylor Thompson; Jay Steingrub; R Duncan Hite; Marc Moss; Alan Morris; Ning Dong; Peter Rock Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael P Casaer; Dieter Mesotten; Greet Hermans; Pieter J Wouters; Miet Schetz; Geert Meyfroidt; Sophie Van Cromphaut; Catherine Ingels; Philippe Meersseman; Jan Muller; Dirk Vlasselaers; Yves Debaveye; Lars Desmet; Jasperina Dubois; Aime Van Assche; Simon Vanderheyden; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Naomi E Cahill; Lauren Murch; Khursheed Jeejeebhoy; Stephen A McClave; Andrew G Day; Miao Wang; Daren K Heyland Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Todd W Rice; Susan Mogan; Margaret A Hays; Gordon R Bernard; Gordon L Jensen; Arthur P Wheeler Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gordon S Doig; Philippa T Heighes; Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Andrew R Davies Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michael P Casaer; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Pieter J Wouters; Dieter Mesotten; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pierre Singer; Mette M Berger; Greet Van den Berghe; Gianni Biolo; Philip Calder; Alastair Forbes; Richard Griffiths; Georg Kreyman; Xavier Leverve; Claude Pichard Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Dale M Needham; Victor D Dinglas; O Joseph Bienvenu; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Amy W Wozniak; Todd W Rice; Ramona O Hopkins Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-03-19