PURPOSE: Rural populations face numerous barriers to mental health care. Although internet-delivered mental health treatments may offer an accessible and cost-effective answer to these barriers, there has been little evaluation of the feasibility of this approach among rural communities. METHODS: Data were obtained from a random rural community sample through the third wave of the Australian Rural Mental Health Study. Attitudes towards internet-delivered mental health treatments and availability of internet access were explored. Data were analysed to identify sub-groups in whom internet-delivered treatments may be usefully targeted. RESULTS: Twelve hundred and forty-six participants completed the survey (mean age 59 years, 61% females, 22% from remote areas). Overall, 75% had internet access and 20% would consider using internet-based interventions, with 18% meeting both of these feasibility criteria. Logistic regression revealed feasibility for internet-delivered mental health treatment was associated with younger age, male gender, being a carer, and a 12-month mental health problem. Participants who had used internet-delivered services in the past were significantly more likely to endorse these treatments as acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential for internet-delivered treatments to increase service accessibility to some sub-groups, particularly among people with mental health problems who are not currently seeking help. Resistance to internet treatments appears to be largely attitudinal, suggesting that enhancing community education and familiarity with such programs may be effective in improving perceptions and ultimately access.
PURPOSE: Rural populations face numerous barriers to mental health care. Although internet-delivered mental health treatments may offer an accessible and cost-effective answer to these barriers, there has been little evaluation of the feasibility of this approach among rural communities. METHODS: Data were obtained from a random rural community sample through the third wave of the Australian Rural Mental Health Study. Attitudes towards internet-delivered mental health treatments and availability of internet access were explored. Data were analysed to identify sub-groups in whom internet-delivered treatments may be usefully targeted. RESULTS: Twelve hundred and forty-six participants completed the survey (mean age 59 years, 61% females, 22% from remote areas). Overall, 75% had internet access and 20% would consider using internet-based interventions, with 18% meeting both of these feasibility criteria. Logistic regression revealed feasibility for internet-delivered mental health treatment was associated with younger age, male gender, being a carer, and a 12-month mental health problem. Participants who had used internet-delivered services in the past were significantly more likely to endorse these treatments as acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential for internet-delivered treatments to increase service accessibility to some sub-groups, particularly among people with mental health problems who are not currently seeking help. Resistance to internet treatments appears to be largely attitudinal, suggesting that enhancing community education and familiarity with such programs may be effective in improving perceptions and ultimately access.
Authors: Michelle G Craske; Raphael D Rose; Ariel Lang; Stacy Shaw Welch; Laura Campbell-Sills; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Murray B Stein; Peter P Roy-Byrne Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Annemarie Wright; Patrick D McGorry; Meredith G Harris; Anthony F Jorm; Kerryn Pennell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Per Egil Kummervold; Catherine E Chronaki; Berthold Lausen; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Janne Rasmussen; Silvina Santana; Andrzej Staniszewski; Silje Camilla Wangberg Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Hege K Andreassen; Maria M Bujnowska-Fedak; Catherine E Chronaki; Roxana C Dumitru; Iveta Pudule; Silvina Santana; Henning Voss; Rolf Wynn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kerrie Shandley; David William Austin; Britt Klein; Ciaran Pier; Peter Schattner; David Pierce; Victoria Wade Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Brian E Bunnell; Tatiana M Davidson; Daniel Dewey; Matthew Price; Kenneth J Ruggiero Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Sam McCrabb; Amanda L Baker; John Attia; Zsolt J Balogh; Natalie Lott; Kerrin Palazzi; Justine Naylor; Ian A Harris; Christopher Doran; Johnson George; Luke Wolfenden; Eliza Skelton; Billie Bonevski Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2017-05-30
Authors: Tonelle E Handley; Frances J Kay-Lambkin; Kerry J Inder; Terry J Lewin; John R Attia; Jeffrey Fuller; David Perkins; Clare Coleman; Natasha Weaver; Brian J Kelly Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 3.630