OBJECTIVES: This article describes a computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program designed to support the delivery of evidenced-based CBT for the four most commonly occurring anxiety disorders (panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder) in primary-care settings. The purpose of the current report is to (1) present the structure and format of the computer-assisted CBT program, and (2) to present evidence for acceptance of the program by clinicians and the effectiveness of the program for patients. METHODS: Thirteen clinicians using the computer-assisted CBT program with patients in our ongoing Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management study provided Likert-scale ratings and open-ended responses about the program. Rating scale data from 261 patients who completed at least one CBT session were also collected. RESULTS: Overall, the program was highly rated and modally described as very helpful. Results indicate that the patients fully participated (i.e., attendance and homework compliance), understood the program material, and acquired CBT skills. In addition, significant and substantial improvements occurred to the same degree in randomly audited subsets of each of the four primary anxiety disorders (N=74), in terms of self ratings of anxiety, depression, and expectations for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted CBT programs provide a practice-based system for disseminating evidence-based mental health treatment in primary-care settings while maintaining treatment fidelity, even in the hands of novice clinicians. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: This article describes a computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program designed to support the delivery of evidenced-based CBT for the four most commonly occurring anxiety disorders (panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder) in primary-care settings. The purpose of the current report is to (1) present the structure and format of the computer-assisted CBT program, and (2) to present evidence for acceptance of the program by clinicians and the effectiveness of the program for patients. METHODS: Thirteen clinicians using the computer-assisted CBT program with patients in our ongoing Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management study provided Likert-scale ratings and open-ended responses about the program. Rating scale data from 261 patients who completed at least one CBT session were also collected. RESULTS: Overall, the program was highly rated and modally described as very helpful. Results indicate that the patients fully participated (i.e., attendance and homework compliance), understood the program material, and acquired CBT skills. In addition, significant and substantial improvements occurred to the same degree in randomly audited subsets of each of the four primary anxiety disorders (N=74), in terms of self ratings of anxiety, depression, and expectations for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted CBT programs provide a practice-based system for disseminating evidence-based mental health treatment in primary-care settings while maintaining treatment fidelity, even in the hands of novice clinicians. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Per Carlbring; Elisabeth Nilsson-Ihrfelt; Johan Waara; Cecilia Kollenstam; Monica Buhrman; Viktor Kaldo; Marie Söderberg; Lisa Ekselius; Gerhard Andersson Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2004-12-13
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Bradley N Gaynes; Jonathan W Stewart; Stephen R Wisniewski; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; James F Luther; Diane Stegman; Joanne Deveaugh-Geiss; Robert Howland Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Michael Von Korff; Evette J Ludman; Wayne J Katon; Carolyn Rutter; Jürgen Unützer; Elizabeth H B Lin; Terry Bush; Edward Walker Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Michelle G Craske; Peter P Roy-Byrne; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2009-07-14
Authors: Jutta M Joesch; Daniela Golinelli; Cathy D Sherbourne; Greer Sullivan; Murray B Stein; Michelle G Craske; Peter P Roy-Byrne Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Peter Roy-Byrne; Michelle G Craske; Greer Sullivan; Raphael D Rose; Mark J Edlund; Ariel J Lang; Alexander Bystritsky; Stacy Shaw Welch; Denise A Chavira; Daniela Golinelli; Laura Campbell-Sills; Cathy D Sherbourne; Murray B Stein Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lily A Brown; Michelle G Craske; Daniel E Glenn; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Stacy S Welch; Laura Campbell-Sills; Ariel Lang; Peter Roy-Byrne; Raphael D Rose Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Darren R Christensen; Reid D Landes; Lisa Jackson; Lisa A Marsch; Michael J Mancino; Mohit P Chopra; Warren K Bickel Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-08-04