Literature DB >> 23688786

Sartorius transposition during inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.

Edmund K Bartlett1, Chelsey Meise, Neha Bansal, John P Fischer, David W Low, Brian J Czerniecki, Robert E Roses, Douglas L Fraker, Rachel R Kelz, Giorgos C Karakousis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for melanoma has been associated with high rates of wound complication (WC). Sartorius transposition (ST) is a technique that has been proposed to minimize morbidity. We report the frequency of utilization of ST and associated clinical outcomes in a national sample.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing ILND for melanoma were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (2005-2011). ST status was determined. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Propensity score matching was used to control for operative time. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine the likelihood of a WC following ST in the matched cohort.
RESULTS: Of the 381 patients identified, 13% had a WC. By univariate analysis, increasing body mass index (P = 0.006), diabetes (P = 0.02), and longer operative time (P = 0.005) were associated with WC. Sixty-three patients received a prophylactic ST (16.5%). ST use was significantly associated with deep nodal dissection (P = 0.03) and increased operative time (P < 0.0001) but not with any preoperative risk factors. WC rates were similar between ST and non-ST patients (10% versus 14%, P = 0.39). In the multivariate analysis of patients matched for operative time, ST was the only factor significantly associated with lower WC rate. The WC rate was 23% in non-ST compared with 8% in ST patients (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, ST is used infrequently at the time of ILND. Moreover, patients undergoing ST do not appear to be selected based on the patient factors associated with increased risk of WC. Risk factors for wound complication should be considered in the selective use of ST.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inguinal lymph node dissection; Melanoma; Sartorius transposition flap; Wound complication

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23688786     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

Review 1.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.

Authors:  Yanxiang Shao; Xu Hu; Shangqing Ren; Duwu Liao; Zhen Yang; Yang Liu; Thongher Lia; Kan Wu; Sanchao Xiong; Weixiao Yang; Shuyang Feng; Yaohui Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Morbidity After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissections: It Is Time for a Change.

Authors:  Marloes Faut; Rianne M Heidema; Harald J Hoekstra; Robert J van Ginkel; S Lukas B Been; Schelto Kruijff; Barbara L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Definition and severity grading of postoperative lymphatic leakage following inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Andreas Lutz Heinrich Gerken; Florian Herrle; Jens Jakob; Christel Weiß; Nuh N Rahbari; Kai Nowak; Constantin Karthein; Peter Hohenberger; Jürgen Weitz; Christoph Reißfelder; Jakob C Dobroschke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.445

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.