Literature DB >> 23685710

Real-time sonoelastography of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Aynur Turan1, Abdurrahman Tufan, Rıdvan Mercan, Mehmet Akif Teber, Mehmet Engin Tezcan, Berivan Bitik, Berna Goker, Seminur Haznedaroğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Real-time sonoelastography (SE) is a new ultrasound-based imaging technique that provides information on tissue elasticity and stiffness. We determined the efficacy of SE for assessing Achilles tendon abnormalities in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one consecutive AS patients and 32 asymptomatic healthy subjects were enrolled. Achillodynia was scored on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale. A high-resolution ultrasound machine equipped with an elastography-compatible linear probe was used to perform bilateral B-mode ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and SE examinations of Achilles tendons. Tendons were divided into proximal, middle, and distal segments. B-mode examinations included tendon thicknesses, echotextures, and enthesopathic findings. SE using color-coded images was performed in the same areas. Normal consistent tendon structures were coded as blue or green, and moderately (yellow) or severely (red) softened areas were considered pathological.
RESULTS: The distal third of the Achilles tendons was the most commonly affected part in the AS patients compared with healthy subjects (p = 0.001), whose middle third was more commonly affected. Achillodynia intensity tended to be higher in patients with pathological B-mode or SE examination findings (p = 0.09 and p = 0.07 respectively). Softening detected by SE in the distal third was associated with enthesopathy findings such as calcaneal bone erosions (Fisher's X (2), p = 0.07) and tendinous enlargement (Fisher's X (2), p = 0.001). B-mode and SE findings had moderate to good correlation in the assessment of Achilles tendon abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Sonoelastography may be useful for the evaluation of tendon abnormalities in patients with AS; in addition; it may be useful for the evaluation of other inflammatory rheumatic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685710     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1637-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jörg Bojunga; Eva Herrmann; Gesine Meyer; Sonja Weber; Stefan Zeuzem; Mireen Friedrich-Rust
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography.

Authors:  Farzana Alam; Kumiko Naito; Jun Horiguchi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Toshihiro Tachikake; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Elastography in the management of liver disease.

Authors:  Edwin L Carstensen; Kevin J Parker; Robert M Lerner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Achilles tendon ultrasound technique.

Authors:  Qian Dong; David P Fessell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description.

Authors:  E E Drakonaki; G M Allen; D J Wilson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 6.  The development and clinical applications of musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Authors:  Eugene G McNally
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Yao Hou; Hua-Min Zheng; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Yuan-Ping Hu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you.

Authors:  Brian S Garra
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.657

9.  Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons.

Authors:  Tobias De Zordo; Christian Fink; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Vinzenz Smekal; Markus Reindl; Andrea Sabine Klauser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T De Zordo; R Chhem; V Smekal; G Feuchtner; M Reindl; C Fink; R Faschingbauer; W Jaschke; A S Klauser
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.548

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus.

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Strain Ultrasound Elastography in the Achilles Tendon of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Treated With Anti-TNF-α: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Enrico M Zardi; Maria Elena Pipita; Chiara Giorgi; Antonella Afeltra; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Ultrasound elastography in tendon pathology: state of the art.

Authors:  Romain Domenichini; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Andrea Podda; Sébastien Aubry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Features of the Achilles tendon, paratenon, and enthesis in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : A clinical and ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  H Harman; E Süleyman
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Real-time sonoelastography using an external reference material: test-retest reliability of healthy Achilles tendons.

Authors:  Alessandro Schneebeli; Filippo Del Grande; Gabriele Vincenzo; Corrado Cescon; Ron Clijsen; Fulvio Biordi; Marco Barbero
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Evaluation of Periarticular Soft Tissues in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis by Superb Microvascular Imaging and Shear Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Ömer Faruk Ünal; Zuhal BayramoĞlu; İbrahim Adaletlİ
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 1.472

7.  Sonoelastography shows that Achilles tendons with insertional tendinopathy are harder than asymptomatic tendons.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Yehua Cai; Yinghui Hua; Jun Shi; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Intratendinous tears of the Achilles tendon - a new pathology? Analysis of a large 4-year cohort.

Authors:  Otto Chan; Sarah Morton; Mel Pritchard; Tina Parkes; Peter Malliaras; Tom Crisp; Nat Padhiar; Nicola Maffulli; John King; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

9.  Real-time sonoelastography: principles and clinical applications in tendon disorders. A systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Fusini; Francesco Langella; Alberto Busilacchi; Cosimo Tudisco; Antonio Gigante; Alessandro Massé; Salvatore Bisicchia
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  The Diagnostic Significance of Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Achilles Tendon Thickness for the Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy in Patients with Heel Pain.

Authors:  Du-Hwan Kim; Jae-Hyeong Choi; Chul-Hyun Park; Hee-Jin Park; Kyung-Jae Yoon; Yong-Taek Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.