Literature DB >> 23685390

Pupil responses to high-level image content.

Marnix Naber1, Ken Nakayama.   

Abstract

The link between arousal and pupil dilation is well studied, but it is less known that other cognitive processes can trigger pupil responses. Here we present evidence that pupil responses can be induced by high-level scene processing, independent of changes in low-level features or arousal. In Experiment 1, we recorded changes in pupil diameter of observers while they viewed a variety of natural scenes with or without a sun that were presented either upright or inverted. Image inversion had the strongest effect on the pupil responses. The pupil constricted more to the onset of upright images as compared to inverted images. Furthermore, the amplitudes of pupil constrictions to viewing images containing a sun were larger relative to control images. In Experiment 2, we presented cartoon versions of upright and inverted pictures that included either a sun or a moon. The image backgrounds were kept identical across conditions. Similar to Experiment 1, upright images triggered pupil constrictions with larger amplitudes than inverted images and images of the sun evoked greater pupil contraction than images of the moon. We suggest that the modulations of pupil responses were due to higher-level interpretations of image content.

Keywords:  arousal; attention; content; image statistics; moon; perception; perceptual brightness; pupil constriction; pupillometry; scene processing; sun

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685390     DOI: 10.1167/13.6.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  37 in total

1.  Pupillometry as a glimpse into the neurochemical basis of human memory encoding.

Authors:  Russell Cohen Hoffing; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Dissociable saccadic suppression of pupillary and perceptual responses to light.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Shunsuke Kidani; Makoto Yoneya; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

4.  How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Pupillary responses to differences in luminance, color and set size.

Authors:  Julia Oster; Jeff Huang; Brian J White; Ralph Radach; Laurent Itti; Douglas P Munoz; Chin-An Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion.

Authors:  Novera Istiqomah; Yuta Suzuki; Yuya Kinzuka; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-26

Review 8.  Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition.

Authors:  Siddhartha Joshi; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Contextual Information Modulates Pupil Size in Autistic Children.

Authors:  Chiara Tortelli; Antonella Pomè; Marco Turi; Roberta Igliozzi; David C Burr; Paola Binda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.152

10.  Pupillary Responses Obey Emmert's Law and Co-vary with Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Chiara Tortelli; Marco Turi; David C Burr; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.