Literature DB >> 23685101

Accuracy of the CNAP monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure readings in the prone position.

Elisabeth Dewhirst1, Marco Corridore, Jan Klamar, Allan Beebe, Julie Rice, N'diris Barry, Joseph D Tobias.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a noninvasive continuous arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor in patients who are positioned prone in the operating room.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Operating room at a children's hospital. PATIENTS: 20 pediatric patients, aged 13.8 ± 2 years, and weight 63.7 ± 18.8 kg, scheduled for surgery in the prone position, and for which arterial catheter placement was planned.
INTERVENTIONS: Measurements were recorded with an arterial line (AL) and a new noninvasive continuous blood pressure (BP) monitor. MEASUREMENTS: Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) pressure readings were captured from an arterial cannula and the CNAP device every minute during anesthesia. MAIN
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of analysis of 4104 pairs of SBP, DBP, and MAP values, which showed an absolute difference between the AL and CNAP device readings of 7.9 ± 6.3 mmHg for SBP, 5.3 ± 4.3 mmHg for DBP, and 4.6 ± 3.9 mmHg for MAP. Bland-Altman analysis of MAP values showed a bias of 0.26 mmHg, with upper and lower limits of agreement of 12.18 mmHg and -11.67 mmHg, respectively. CNAP readings deviated from arterial values by ≤ 5 mmHg in 67% of MAP values, 59% of DBP values, and 43% of SBP readings. The difference was ≤ 10 mmHg for 94% of MAP readings, 90% of DBP values, and 73% of SBP readings.
CONCLUSIONS: During prone positioning, the CNAP monitor provided clinically acceptable accuracy for MAP values, similar to those reported in adults in the supine position.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Blood pressure monitoring devices; Hemodynamics; Hypotension; Pediatric; Pediatrics; intraoperative

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685101     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Accuracy of the CNAP™ monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure measurements during bariatric surgery in severely obese adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias; Chris McKee; Dan Herz; Steve Teich; Paul Sohner; Julie Rice; N'Diris Barry; Marc Michalsky
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  An Evaluation of the NICCI Monitor in Providing Continuous, Noninvasive Blood Pressure Readings in Children During Intraoperative Anesthetic Care.

Authors:  Ismail Bekiroglu; Kwaku Owusu-Bediako; Julie Rice-Weimer; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement Using the NICCI Monitor in Adolescents During Intraoperative Anesthetic Care.

Authors:  Kwaku Owusu-Bediako; Ismail Bekiroglu; Julie Rice-Weimer; Marcelino Murillo-Deluquez; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Martin C Baruch; Kambiz Kalantari; David W Gerdt; Charles M Adkins
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.