BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence from general population studies suggests that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults are more likely to experience adverse cardiovascular outcomes relative to heterosexuals. No studies have examined whether sexual orientation disparities exist in biomarkers of early cardiovascular disease risk. PURPOSE: To determine whether sexual orientation disparities in biomarkers of early cardiovascular risk are present among young adults. METHODS: Data come from Wave IV (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study for Adolescent Health (N=12,451), a prospective nationally representative study of U.S. adolescents followed into young adulthood (mean age=28.9 years). A total of 520 respondents identified as lesbian, gay, or bisexual. Biomarkers included C-reactive protein, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. Analyses were conducted in 2012. RESULTS: In gender-stratified models adjusted for demographics (age, race/ethnicity); SES (income, education); health behaviors (smoking, regular physical activity, alcohol consumption); and BMI, gay and bisexual men had significant elevations in C-reactive protein, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate, compared to heterosexual men. Despite having more risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, and higher BMI, lesbians and bisexual women had lower levels of C-reactive protein than heterosexual women in fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was found for sexual orientation disparities in biomarkers of cardiovascular risk among young adults, particularly in gay and bisexual men. These findings, if confirmed in other studies, suggest that disruptions in core physiologic processes that ultimately confer risk for cardiovascular disease may occur early in the life course for sexual-minority men.
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence from general population studies suggests that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults are more likely to experience adverse cardiovascular outcomes relative to heterosexuals. No studies have examined whether sexual orientation disparities exist in biomarkers of early cardiovascular disease risk. PURPOSE: To determine whether sexual orientation disparities in biomarkers of early cardiovascular risk are present among young adults. METHODS: Data come from Wave IV (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study for Adolescent Health (N=12,451), a prospective nationally representative study of U.S. adolescents followed into young adulthood (mean age=28.9 years). A total of 520 respondents identified as lesbian, gay, or bisexual. Biomarkers included C-reactive protein, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. Analyses were conducted in 2012. RESULTS: In gender-stratified models adjusted for demographics (age, race/ethnicity); SES (income, education); health behaviors (smoking, regular physical activity, alcohol consumption); and BMI, gay and bisexual men had significant elevations in C-reactive protein, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate, compared to heterosexual men. Despite having more risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, and higher BMI, lesbians and bisexual women had lower levels of C-reactive protein than heterosexual women in fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was found for sexual orientation disparities in biomarkers of cardiovascular risk among young adults, particularly in gay and bisexual men. These findings, if confirmed in other studies, suggest that disruptions in core physiologic processes that ultimately confer risk for cardiovascular disease may occur early in the life course for sexual-minority men.
Authors: Tené T Lewis; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews; Charlotte Brown; Kelly Karavolos; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Elizabeth Jacobs; Deidre Wesley Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Janet W Rich-Edwards; Donna Spiegelman; Eileen N Lividoti Hibert; Hee-Jin Jun; Tamarra James Todd; Ichiro Kawachi; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Gail Berkenblit; Tejal Rami; Frederick L Brancati; Neil R Powe; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-09-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Katie A McLaughlin; Katherine M Keyes; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat Ziyadeh; Laurie B Fisher; Jessica A Kahn; Graham A Colditz; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-04
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat J Ziyadeh; Heather L Corliss; Jess Haines; Helaine R Rockett; David Wypij; Alison E Field Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Michelle Birkett; George J Greene; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Michael E Newcomb Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Vickie M Mays; Robert-Paul Juster; Timothy J Williamson; Teresa E Seeman; Susan D Cochran Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Abraham A Brody; Perry N Halkitis; Caroline Dorsen; Gary Yu; Deborah A Chyun Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Cari Jo Clark; Iris W Borowsky; John Salisbury; Joann Usher; Rachael A Spencer; Julia M Przedworski; Lynette M Renner; Colleen Fisher; Susan A Everson-Rose Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Annesa Flentje; Kord M Kober; Adam W Carrico; Torsten B Neilands; Elena Flowers; Nicholas C Heck; Bradley E Aouizerat Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 7.217